Once does not a trend make, CMDR. Glad your incident went well.
Maybe not. But it does make a "given" not so much a "given"!
Once does not a trend make, CMDR. Glad your incident went well.
Correct. If not asked, I won't tell.....
Now, it seemed like S&W645 said exactly the opposite. He said that he would protect his 4th Amendment rights by not offering information not required by law. Then, if his refusal to waive his 4th Amendment rights results in abuse by the officer, he will contact an attorney to seek justice.
Correct. If not asked, I won't tell.
As for being a LEO being dangerous, logging is more so. Agriculture in general, is more dangerous. I spent two weeks in the hospital from agri-chemical exposure which could killed me. The after affects are still not totally known but it has been banned and it is now a known cancer causing agent. Police patrol officers only rank as ninth of the top fifteen. Farmers and ranchers comes in fourth. Loggers are second. Commercial fishing is number one. The 15 Most Dangerous Jobs In America I've worked in #15, 13, 11, 10, and 4 which includes some #2.
Once does not a trend make, CMDR. Glad your incident went well.
Could have bought two Glocks for what that cost me.
We can live without the police but we cannot live without garbage disposal. Well not without making some pretty bad smells.Garbage collector is more dangerous than police officer. If a city had to lay off either there police force or garbage collectors because of budget, I would rather have my garbage collector working every week.
Garbage collector is more dangerous than police officer. If a city had to lay off either there police force or garbage collectors because of budget, I would rather have my garbage collector working every week.
You say that but I doubt you believe it. What would your family and wife do if you were murdered and there was nobody to even attempt to do anything about it? Your wife would have no husband, and she would be too busy working to go about trying to find witnesses from your murder and collect old evidence, assuming somebody told her you died. Without police, Im sure it would be hard for her to even find out if you had died, and much harder to do anything about it.
It takes a sort of childlike naivete to believe that the police are going to "protect" you as an individual from a murder. Unless you have a personal bodyguard detail, it's pretty much a 100% lock that they won't.You say that but I doubt you believe it. What would your family and wife do if you were murdered and there was nobody to even attempt to do anything about it? Your wife would have no husband, and she would be too busy working to go about trying to find witnesses from your murder and collect old evidence, assuming somebody told her you died. Without police, Im sure it would be hard for her to even find out if you had died, and much harder to do anything about it.
It takes a sort of childlike naivete to believe that the police are going to "protect" you as an individual from a murder.
The police are very rarely ever there to prevent a violent crime from happening.
Say, could you tell everybody about the New Orleans PD's "investigation" of the Danziger Bridge murders?Do me a favor, both of you. Show me where I said anything about police protecting people. Dont change my words and start an argument about things I didnt say. I suggest you two both go back and read what I actually did say.
I clearly stated a problem posed by not having police in the aftermath of a crime. I didnt say anything about protecting you or preventing crime. Work on your reading comprehension before you start arguing with me.
And Deanimator, I love how you even put the word protect in quotes while responding to me. It implies that you are using my word. But for the life of me I just do not see where in my post you pulled the word "protect" from.
Say, could you tell everybody about the New Orleans PD's "investigation" of the Danziger Bridge murders?
Did they ever "find" the perpetrators?
Oh, so you don't "know about" the notorious murder of several people by the New Orleans PD, accompanied by the extensive coverup?I dont know what the case is you are referring to, and I dont have the time to study it, but I have a feeling its what you are using to justify your distaste for the police. But I guess a few police officers in New Orleans accurately represent the other almost 700,000 law enforcement across the nation after all... It makes a lot of sense to generalize that many people based on one or even a couple examples of bad police.
Oh, so you don't "know about" the notorious murder of several people by the New Orleans PD, accompanied by the extensive coverup?
Or maybe you also don't know about the home invasion, burglary and kidnapping ring operating INSIDE of the Chicago PD.
Or maybe you also don't know about the armed robbery ring operating inside of the Philadelphia PD.
Or maybe you also don't know about the organized torture ring operating for DECADES inside the Chicago PD.
Or maybe you also don't know about the murder of Katherine Johnston by the Atlanta PD.
It's pretty clear that you don't know about a LOT... and can't be bothered to "study" it.
Want more?Its pretty clear you are an expert on 5 cases of some law enforcement personnel being bad. Good job for you!
Actually, the Chicago PD torture ring wasn't that pansy Abu Ghraib nonsense. It was real Klaus Barbie torture.With your logic, you must hate the entire US military as well. After all, does Abu Ghraib ring a bell?
Want more?
Link Removed
Actually, the Chicago PD torture ring wasn't that pansy Abu Ghraib nonsense. It was real Klaus Barbie torture.
You don't know... because you don't WANT to know.