CR Williams
New member
Legally defined as pistols, so it seems appropriate to put this subject here. I am considering acquisition of one such. Wonder what thoughts you might have, pro or con, about them.
Have you shot any of them yet, I had a PLR which shoots 223 or 556 and it was one loud SOB, no inside pistol range will let you shoot it at least not around here, outside if your really into long range pistol shooting, but your screwed sort of because there is no offical class so to speak for them, and the PLR was not that accuate, the others like a short AR with no buttstock mat be OK but do not know for sure, but they deffinatly are noisy, if you try to hunt with one you better hit with the first shot, cause everthing in the woods will be running away, also they do not carry well, now with all that said, before buying one try to shoot one a bit, if you like it buy it, thats how I ended up with my S&W 500, another one thats useless but cool as hell to shootLegally defined as pistols, so it seems appropriate to put this subject here. I am considering acquisition of one such. Wonder what thoughts you might have, pro or con, about them.
How much more worthless can an AR be? Just try and make it into a pistol.
Exactly what are you saying that a conventional AR rifle is worthless??? just want to be clear on this before I go any further
You got it. Biggest piece of junk ever made. Too bad the men that died in the rice paddies of viet nam with a jammed ar in their hands, aren't here to bear witness. As a government entity the army is a victim of politics, budgets, international treaties and a lot of other impediments. Once upon a time the army was in the business of winning wars and selected weapons on rigorous testing like that done by the Thompson la garde committee. The weapon they selected on that study wasn't the ar-15/m-16.Exactly what are you saying that a conventional AR rifle is worthless??? just want to be clear on this before I go any further
Is everyone that doesn't follow your herd of sheep a troll? As always I am amazed at the woefully inadequate weapons many if you are willing to bet your lives on.he's actually saying, "Hi, I'm a troll, and I'm here for no other reason than to sh**post."
OOh the stupid is strong with this one.You got it. Biggest piece of junk ever made. Too bad the men that died in the rice paddies of viet nam with a jammed ar in their hands, aren't here to bear witness. As a government entity the army is a victim of politics, budgets, international treaties and a lot of other impediments. Once upon a time the army was in the business of winning wars and selected weapons on rigorous testing like that done by the Thompson la garde committee. The weapon they selected on that study wasn't the ar-15/m-16.
I see lots of criticism of the sheeple on this forum but what are you if you want an AR because that's what the army uses in its full auto version. That's the same army that surrendered unconditionally to that Asian powerhouse, the republic of Vietnam. Try being more than a wannabe with your pseudo military and worthless rifle.
Once upon a time the army was in the business of winning wars and selected weapons on rigorous testing like that done by the Thompson la garde committee.
You got it. Biggest piece of junk ever made. Too bad the men that died in the rice paddies of viet nam with a jammed ar in their hands, aren't here to bear witness. As a government entity the army is a victim of politics, budgets, international treaties and a lot of other impediments. Once upon a time the army was in the business of winning wars and selected weapons on rigorous testing like that done by the Thompson la garde committee. The weapon they selected on that study wasn't the ar-15/m-16.
I see lots of criticism of the sheeple on this forum but what are you if you want an AR because that's what the army uses in its full auto version. That's the same army that surrendered unconditionally to that Asian powerhouse, the republic of Vietnam. Try being more than a wannabe with your pseudo military and worthless rifle.
Lol. It sure sounds to me like your only argument is that it's the issue weapon of our military and therefore it has to be good. Of course, this is a blatant display of foolishness. Our military is tied to this piece of junk by the NATO treaty.I will agree with you on one point, when the M-16 was FIRST introduced it did have some problems, but after revisions it became a good dependable weapon, if it was truly junk as you say even our military would not have kept it in service for 45+ years, as for the rest of your drivel, I make a rule not to argue with morons, as they will ware you down to there level then beat you with experiance
OOh the stupid is strong with this one.
.
And that is all he deserves.
.
.
An AR pistol is great for those that live in a state that prohibits SBR or are waiting for their paperwork to come back. It is more useable than a Draco pistol since you can put your cheek on the buffer tube, but it will rattle your jaw. The short barrel gives away a lot of the performance and like someone said it is real loud. One thing that Glass Wolf? said, a 7.5 inch barrel is too short for a suppressor, I can't remember if 9.5 or 10 is the minimum, but the pressure at 7.5 is too much per the manufacturers FAQ. I consider it more of a range toy than a real tool, but to each his own.
OOh the stupid is strong with this one.
.
And that is all he deserves.
.
.
An AR pistol is great for those that live in a state that prohibits SBR or are waiting for their paperwork to come back. It is more useable than a Draco pistol since you can put your cheek on the buffer tube, but it will rattle your jaw. The short barrel gives away a lot of the performance and like someone said it is real loud. One thing that Glass Wolf? said, a 7.5 inch barrel is too short for a suppressor, I can't remember if 9.5 or 10 is the minimum, but the pressure at 7.5 is too much per the manufacturers FAQ. I consider it more of a range toy than a real tool, but to each his own.
.Perhaps it's all you can muster. If you are so knowledgeable then why are you unable to refute my argument? By your own admission the AR pistol is nothing but a range toy.
.That's assuming you're using an AR chambered in .223
I'm using an AR pistol with an 8" barrel in .300 AAC for home defense, and it's quite a capable firearm out to 100 yards, which is far beyond any distance inside my home, and about the ragne from my home to the street that delineates the end of my property line. I'm considering going with a suppressor on that gun when I convert it to an SBR. If the supporessor is integral, I'll only need to tax stamp the suppressor, since the barrel will end up being 16" with the suppressor.
No, troll. Plenty of people disagree with me on a great number of topics on this forum, and so far, you're one of the only trolls I've encountered. Christ, you're not even very good at it. Are you even trying?
.
Dude you have quite the persecution complex don't you. Yes I did assume your pistol was a 5.56 which is why I let you know about the minimum barrel length. But since you went all "the world is out to get me" there is no use in discussing why they have a minimum length. Whatever your hypothetical can might possibly be, it won't be a YHM since they have a minimum of 8 inches for 300blk and my non hypothetical gemtech doesn't have one listed yet.
.
And if you want me to try we can discuss your "home defense weapon".... lol