I didn't know Glock made a moduler unit with a thumb safety. Link?For a standard issue sidearm my choice would be the Glock 17.
Beretta produced models that satisfy everything the Army is looking for, just for the Army to turn them down. The government is puting business deals ahead of Soldier's lives by playing these stupid games.The general makes a lot of sense. It shouldn't take rocket surgery to pick a replacement pistol. Any of the major offerings would be good.
I didn't know Glock made a moduler unit with a thumb safety. Link?
The manual safety is one of the Army's requirements for every issued firearm, and pistols also have to have a decocker (which means Glock needs to add a hammer, too). In order for Glock to compete, Glock needs to install a thumb safety.Law enforcement agencies have used Glocks for over two decades without this "thumb safety" thing being an issue. Kinda silly don't ya think?
The manual safety is one of the Army's requirements for every issued firearm, and pistols also have to have a decocker (which means Glock needs to add a hammer, too). In order for Glock to complete, Glock needs to install a thumb safety.
Law enforcement agencies are a different animal altogether and follow different rules.
Right. Because they're the Navy, and the Army is the Army, and Seals aren't reguler Army ground troops.I guess the Navy Seals don't have to follow the Army rules either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?