CLICK HERE TO WIN A FREE GUN

familiar with Wisconsin v Schultz?

Anubis

New member
Congratulations!

From http://www.wisconsinappeals.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Schultz1.pdf :


Retain Judge Counsell!
 

Thomas agreed with the majority that the second amendment was incorporated, albeit for different reasons than the majority.

I don't disagree with your dissertation on supreme court opinions (I've been admitted to the Supreme Court for more than 25 years and have filed petitions for cert and amicus briefs, but have never presented oral argument.)

But the above quote is the critical point. 8 other justices agreed that Thomas was wrong on his incorporation method. A state court or lower federal court that relies on Thomas's theory of incorporation is going to end up with an 8-1 reversal on that issue.
 
Uh, didn't 8 other SCOUTS justices disagree with him?

I guess I am confused? What does SCOTUS have to do with this? This WI district judge used the WI Constitution, the Heller and McDonald decisions to say, in effect, that since the WI Constitution guarantees the right to carry without harassment and that since 941.23 makes concealed carry illegal,, oc must occur without harassment. Since the Madison 5 got harassed just because they were oc'ing, therefore 941.23 is unconstitutional at the state level.

This hasn't been appealed so concealed carry is only legal in Jackson county, where this ruling was made.
 
Email