ZIMMERMAN VERDICT PART 3: “WHO STARTED IT?” Massad Ayoob

[gejoslin]

Massad Ayoob« Link Removed


[h=2]
ZIMMERMAN VERDICT PART 3: “WHO STARTED IT?”[/h]Wednesday, July 17th, 2013

Welcome to the new commentators here, many of whom seem to feel that Zimmerman started the encounter, a concept that concerns many of our regulars as well. Whenever there’s a fight, no matter the degree of consequences, the first question is always “who started it?”Zimmerman took the first action, calling police when he observed Martin. He said that he was concerned because the man in the hoodie appeared to be wandering slowly and aimlessly in heavy rain. This is more consistent with what might be called “casing the joint” than with someone in a hurry to get somewhere dry. He didn’t mention Martin’s skin color until expressly asked about it by the call center operator.Page 2Link Removed​

 

[JSDinTexas]

Mr Ayoob gives an excellent analysis of the facts. His unbiased comments should be read by everyone, and distributed to every person that refuses to accept the truth.

 

[gejoslin]

Mr Ayoob gives an excellent analysis of the facts. His unbiased comments should be read by everyone, and distributed to every person that refuses to accept the truth.

They would just call him a "Creepy azz cracka."

 

[Chief1297]

According to the facts and witness testamony, there was only one racist person assaulting someone else that night and it wasnt Zimmerman. Yes, the term "cracker" or "cracka" are racist no matter what anyone trys to make you believe.