Which pistol would you keep? Which would you sell?

[Vaglocker]

Hey folks,

I currently own a Gen 3 Glock 30, Gen 3 Glock 27, Gen 4 Glock 23, and a Sig p220 fullsize.


All of them I purchased new and shoot them all well. My question is if you absolutely had to sell two, which would they be?

I have struggled with this descision and would like some feedback from others. Which would you sell? Which would you keep?

I know I know, i should keep them all, but would like you feedback. Thanks.

 

[xenaxdsc]

Well, of course this is your decision, but here are some things to consider. Your answers might reveal which you sell.

1) which two are your favorite to shoot and why
2) which will garner the most money back to you
3) which two have the most sentimental appeal
4) which ones cost less to buy ammo for
5) which ones would you regret not owning anymore
6) which two are your "go to" guns in most situations

I'm sure others on the forum will have more and better questions. Again, only you will know the answer.

Know thyself. A simple, yet powerful notion.

 

[Deserteagle]

Sell the Sig first because Glock is better.
Then sell the Glock 30 because I would rather have a smaller caliber in a subcompact gun than a .45

 

[father-of-three]

One of the .40s, if you like .45s better, or vice-versa.

At least you worked things out so you have only two calibers to buy, not 4!

 

[Tucker's Mom]

I would choose the Stingray to sell. Keep your Glocks. If you do, you are on my right side. <g>....

 

[Vaglocker]

I think I am leaning towards selling the two .45s. Keeping two .40s allows me to keep one caliber ammo (cheaper) and since they are both Glocks the 23 mags will be interchangable with the 27. 27 for a carry weapon and the 23 for the house. Ok I think that helps me. thanks for letting me talk it out.

 

[LS-208]

I'm not a Glock person, so yeah, I would have to dump em'.

 

[grmerrill]

Do you have any other options, maybe selling a kidney or plasma?

 

[Brian Willis]

I'd probably keep the 23. Its a solid size for concealed carry, but can take the place of a larger pistol if needed.

 

[Cotillion]

I would keep both .40 cal glocks. They fit both needs and owning 2 guns in the same caliber is cheaper than owning .40 and .45

 

[B2Tall]

C'mon.....that's like trying to decide which of your kids to sell?? Keep 'em all!

[size=-2](That is, of course, unless one of them is a real problem-child. If so get rid of that one)[/size]

 

[fudo]

I'd keep the .45's and dump the .40's.

 

[cougaram]

Drop 'em all and buy a Kimber and a Beretta or H&K.

 

[Iam2Taz]

Glad we could help with that. Whew... too much work!

 

[itdirectorpaul]

I say find a way to sell something else and keep them all.

 

[Valorius]

I would sell the Glocks and keep the Sig.

 

[tuts40]

I would keep both .40 cal glocks. They fit both needs and owning 2 guns in the same caliber is cheaper than owning .40 and .45

Bingo, we have a winner!

 

[NCIC105]

I would drop the wife and keep the gun's. They are more dependable...But then again that's just me!

 

[Rocketgeezer]

After owning or shooting other people's I have shot all the examples your talking about, I would keep the 23 first then the Sig, the subcompact's are great to conceal but are abit tough to shoot, a lot of muzzle flip, hard to do follow up shots, I will not get into the 40 vs 45 deal I have several examples of both, along with 9mm's and 380's and a couple of those NA 22 magnum's, and at the typical self defence range 15-20 ft I would NOT want to be shot with any of them

 

[Ringo]

I would sell the Glocks and keep the Sig.

You said it for me.