BluesStringer
Les Brers
Scenario: A certain self-avowed rabidly anti-2A individual is swept into the Oval office in 2008 due to current and future events. Along with that person the major per centage of the Congress from the same party gets seated.
The doomsday scenario is upon us. Unbelievably prescient the way Hoplites laid it out above.
So what now? How do we organize to resist the inevitable march towards the Constitution being rendered a meaningless antiquity, while still operating within what some here expressed as "legal" opposition earlier in this thread? How do we "legally" prevent Hoplites' prescience from accurately predicting events in 2012 and beyond below?
See, the question for me isn't how WE maintain our law-abiding status, it's how do we convince enough Americans that the government has been operating illegally since the days of Wyatt Earp and the OK Corral in Tombstone, AZ by using nothing more than an arbitrarily arrived-at edict to disarm an entire community? We, as people who freely choose to exercise our God-given, protected-for-perpetuity, unalienable rights, have always been legal, even when discussing on a public forum how best to resist a run-amok, outlaw government. If anyone who owns/runs this site is liable because we use it as the technology was designed for, to facilitate political, informational and yes, maybe even radical free-flow of ideas, then said owners/administrators of this site will be liable for me posting the following excerpt from The Declaration of Independence:After four years of slowly whittling away at the 2A--the frog in the frying pan analogy--in 2012 a re-election and a return of the same seated Congress. Even more draconian laws are passed. Then the ultimate constitutional betrayal--total ban on handguns, most rifles/shotguns. We're ordered to peacefully turn them in within 90 days or face legal action. The local police, BATF, FBI, and Homeland Defense start to visit those people who refuse to turn them in and forcably take them. What's a body to do?
Love my country, fear my Government
Following that passage is a litany of grievances that the Colonists charged against the King of England. It is scary how much it resembles modern-day circumstances, only the grievances aren't directed at an overseas despot, but right at 536 American citizens who rule as though they were protected by impassable oceans. They aren't untouchable though. They are just as answerable to the law for their subversions of the Constitution as we would be if we had the power to wield to truly subvert it, which we obviously don't have if even discussing such controversial issues can be shut down on the basis of a webmaster being liable for what complete strangers to him/her type on a public forum!We hold these truths to be self-evident:
That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government.
**Emphasis obviously mine.
Blues
Last edited: