OK, here's a good philosophical question for everyone. I know what most of you will say without thinking, but please carefully consider all the details before responding.
Situation: you work at a company that's adamantly against carrying firearms on campus. Company policy clearly states that employees aren't allowed to carry on campus. There is a mass shooting threat toward the company.
This is the best job you ever had with a great boss, great pay and great benefits. The last thing you want is to lose this job, despite your objection to the no-carry rule.
So, what would you do? Risk your job by carrying to defend yourself if/when the situation arises, or forgo carrying because you'd be more devastated if you lost your job?
Situation: you work at a company that's adamantly against carrying firearms on campus. Company policy clearly states that employees aren't allowed to carry on campus. There is a mass shooting threat toward the company.
This is the best job you ever had with a great boss, great pay and great benefits. The last thing you want is to lose this job, despite your objection to the no-carry rule.
So, what would you do? Risk your job by carrying to defend yourself if/when the situation arises, or forgo carrying because you'd be more devastated if you lost your job?