golocx4
Got Beretta's?
Dem Congressman: Link Removed
AND NOW YOU KNOW WHY THE ANTI GUN CLASS IS THE ANTI GUN CLASS!!! Do you still think you can reason with them?
(CNSNews.com) – Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said only the federal government should have “high-capacity” gun magazines and that the “state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence.”
The lawmaker told CNSNews.com that he not only supports prohibiting the future sale of 10-round gun magazines, but he would like to confiscate high-capacity clips already legally possessed by American citizens.
CNSNews.com then asked, “But if a bill was brought up and passed to ban high-capacity clips would the military still be allowed to use them?”
“Of course, the military would be allowed to use them,” Nadler said.
“So only the government would be allowed to have high-capacity clips?” CNSNews.com asked.
“Yes.”
“But let me say, yes,” Nadler added. “One of the definitions of a nation state is that the state has a monopoly on legitimate violence. And the state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence.”
“If the premise of your question is that people are going to resist a tyrannical government by shooting machine guns at American troops, that’s insane,” he said.
AND NOW YOU KNOW WHY THE ANTI GUN CLASS IS THE ANTI GUN CLASS!!! Do you still think you can reason with them?
(CNSNews.com) – Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said only the federal government should have “high-capacity” gun magazines and that the “state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence.”
The lawmaker told CNSNews.com that he not only supports prohibiting the future sale of 10-round gun magazines, but he would like to confiscate high-capacity clips already legally possessed by American citizens.
CNSNews.com then asked, “But if a bill was brought up and passed to ban high-capacity clips would the military still be allowed to use them?”
“Of course, the military would be allowed to use them,” Nadler said.
“So only the government would be allowed to have high-capacity clips?” CNSNews.com asked.
“Yes.”
“But let me say, yes,” Nadler added. “One of the definitions of a nation state is that the state has a monopoly on legitimate violence. And the state ought to have a monopoly on legitimate violence.”
“If the premise of your question is that people are going to resist a tyrannical government by shooting machine guns at American troops, that’s insane,” he said.