What 1st amendment--Police Detain and Draw Weapons on Student Activist

[SGB]

I thought the first rule of the left was constantly fill your worthless posts with stupid smiley faces.




Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

PERFECT example.

 

[Warbirds]

I actually like Utah requiring 5 year renewals. It allows me to bypass the background check when I purchase a firearm, all they do is a quick call to verify the permit and I don't have to pay a fee. So BC1 I prefer that over the NY life permits for that reason.

I also like that Utah runs a daily background check so that if someone is convicted of a crime their permit is quickly revoked. I don't know if NY does something similar.

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Warbirds]

PERFECT example.

Sorry cant :what: understand you without :sly: all your smileys :banghead:. Not :thumbdown: used to you using :screwy: words .

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

[SGB]

Sorry cant :what: understand you without :sly: all your smileys :banghead:. Not :thumbdown: used to you using :screwy: words .

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

You just keep reinforcing

my point my jealous

liberal flyby friend. Deflect, deflect, deflect and try to denigrate through emotional attack. (you're just jealous my smileys are so my better than yours) :laugh:

 

[Warbirds]

You just keep reinforcing

my point my jealous

liberal flyby friend. Deflect, deflect, deflect and try to denigrate through emotional attack. (you're just jealous my smileys are so my better than yours) :laugh:

So.... you don't understand that calling me a liberal is...... the pot (you) calling the kettle (me) black?

If you were able to have an intellectual conversation with BC1 instead of calling him a strawman (ie your temper tantrum) you wouldn't be calling others liberals that are trying to deflect the conversation.

I'm trying to tread lightly because I know you are from Florida and I used a word that may be considered racially insensitive and heaven knows nothing intelligent has come out of Florida in regards to race in months now.

 

[SGB]

So.... you don't understand that calling me a liberal is...... the pot (you) calling the kettle (me) black?

If you were able to have an intellectual conversation with BC1 instead of calling him a strawman (ie your temper tantrum) you wouldn't be calling others liberals that are trying to deflect the conversation.

I'm trying to tread lightly because I know you are from Florida and I used a word that may be considered racially insensitive and heaven knows nothing intelligent has come out of Florida in regards to race in months now.

Deflect & attack what a load of

but it's OK, I just consider the source

......... oh yeah

you too

the smileys are just cuz you luv them so much ...................

 

[S&W645]

It is not open to the public. Any person who is not a student can be booted out. Students must adhere to the published rules. Testing the limits of a gun policy by carrying an empty holster is baiting for a problem. The local mall is also open to the public but is not a public place.

Further there is no constiitutional right in America to carry a gun. This has been repeatedly decided by both the SCOTUS in Heller and McDonald and further by the U.S. ninth circuit court in September 2011. The second doesn't mean what WE interpret it to mean, it means what the high court interprets... same as any law.

Let him try to sue for violating hgis rights. The issue is DOA. It's already been to the SCOTUS.

I'll agree on all but it having been decided by the SCOTUS. Carry outside of the home has not yet been decided. Neither Heller or McDonald brought that to the court.

 

[S&W645]

....
The information on FL was obtained from the application documents provided by the FL Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Licensing. Any incorrect facts contained therein are the responsibility of the state of FL.



Got it. But we don’t have any similar law. So in FL one can carry the gun without breaking the law but can't use it while under the influence? Why would they have it on them? .......

How old are those documents you have. If you have a date on them or a form number, PM me and I'll get a copy of them to get to the proper persons to get changed. But as of 2 years ago, my application did not have that on them. We only have to inform if asked.

For your second part, you missed Jim's continuation of the law. If self defense/property protection is involved, even under the influence is covered.

 

[BC1]

I'll agree on all but it having been decided by the SCOTUS. Carry outside of the home has not yet been decided. Neither Heller or McDonald brought that to the court.

Correct, they failed to rule on the issue in Heller and McDonald. In their decision they did make reference to a historical interpretation of the second in this context. It was then captioned in the September 2011 ruling by the ninth district court.

In Kachalsky, et al. v. Cacace, et al., No. 10-CV-5413 (CS), five individual plaintiffs and the Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., argued that the “proper cause” provision of the handgun laws law governing the issuance of licenses to carry concealed handguns in public violates their rights under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as defined in two recent landmark decisions by the United States Supreme Court, District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), and McDonald v. City of Chicago, 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010).

Citing both the Heller and McDonald decisions, Judge Cathy Seibel ruled that the Second Amendment provides the right to keep arms for the purpose of self defense in the home, but does not extend to a right to carry concealed handguns in public.

She's a liberal.