The difference is that cars aren't produced for the express purpose to kill people, guns are.
I've killed many a pig and cow with a gun....never a person.
we drive around in 4 wheeled 4,000 lbs bullets all day & night kids running out in front of you in a mall parking lot , people texting while driving these bullets & yet some people are scared of holstered handguns whether open or concealed.
hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Here's a scary thought. Johnny is angry. Angry at the world for his lousy life. Johnny is also nuts. He's so nuts he can't get a gun. Cause Johnny is on the federal nutjob list. And most guns have now been banned by the new O administration anyway. But Johnny has a drivers license. And he has an idea. He rents a Ford Excursion from the local Avis and drives on over to the campus. The campus where people laugh at him and teachers don't understand him. There's 30,000 full-time students on that campus. He waits until the 15 minute break between classes and points his 4,000 pound weapon toward the college green. The headlines read "84 Mowed Down by Lunatic at State University!" The liberal pundits ask "what made Johnny do this?" "Was it the rap music? Video games? Violence on TV? Should we ban these things?" Nahhh. Johnny was nuts, remember? What happened to being nuts, that's no longer an option? One can never stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws. It's Insane!!!!
I'm on your side. My guns have killed a number of different animals. Non of them human.
The difference is that cars aren't produced for the express purpose to kill people, guns are. That's what the left wing anti-gun crowd will tell you.
The carrying of a firearm was prohibited in most western towns in the mid-late 1800's. It was strictly enforced.That's not the salient issue for open carrying.
The salient issue is that 60% of the US population is non-gun owning.
Whereas 100% drive vehicles etc.
If 100% were gun owning and gun carrying, then it would not matter, such as back in the days of the Wild West.
But this is not the Wild West. Therefore CCW is more appropriate today.
Because out of sight is out of mind for the 60%.
What Einstien told you that. Been teaching LEO a long time. Have spent a lot of time at police ranges. Short of sniper work I've never seen this or even heard of it. Some advice... should you ever be involved in a shooting and your computer is named in the search warrant, this statement will be found during a digital forensic examination. You can't delete it, ever, and it's an admission against your penal interest.My 45ACP pistol is designed to kill humans, and when I take police sponsored shooting classes, we aim for the triangle between the eyes and the nose.
Do you want the Obama record again? Have you forgotton it? I'll post it with links to the bills and votes if you need reminding.You should find a better boogieman than the left wing. There is anti-gun in both wings.
My 45ACP pistol is designed to kill humans, and when I take police sponsored shooting classes, we aim for the triangle between the eyes and the nose.
My 44 magnum revolver is designed to kill animals, as is my 300 RUM scoped rifle.
My 12 gauge shotgun can kill anything, either way. Even stop a mob in a riot.
Your "45ACP pistol" is not designed to kill humans. It is designed to take in .45 caliber bullets and discharge them at a high velocity, eject the spent casing, and prepare another .45 caliber bullet for discharge upon the operator pulling the trigger.
How you decide to use that capability is your choice. Likewise for your other guns.
Actually it was precisely designed to kill Philippinos by John Browning. Ergo humans.