trveling from KY to Floridia and I plan to concealed carry on way looking for help

RCR29

New member
I am Ky resident with a valid permit. I will be traveling From Ky to Florida in My own vehicle. I will pass thru Wv, North and South Carolina and Georgia ending in Florida.
I plan on carrying a Keltec pf9 in a pocket holster. All states honor ky's permit and I have read all the states laws. Just wondering if any one knows something I am missing or that I should know about there state before doing this.
 
NC is a must advise state, if you are stopped by a LEO. Gunbuster signs have the force of law, but effective today it is reduced from a misdemeanor to an infraction.
 
In any state outside KY, when you are within 1000' of any school and on public property (IE: street) you will be violating Federal law by having the gun loaded.

18 USC 922 (q)(2):
18 U.S. Code § 922 - Unlawful acts
(q)
(2)
(A) It shall be unlawful for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone.

(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to the possession of a firearm—
(i) on private property not part of school grounds;

(ii) if the individual possessing the firearm is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located or a political subdivision of the State, and the law of the State or political subdivision requires that, before an individual obtains such a license, the law enforcement authorities of the State or political subdivision verify that the individual is qualified under law to receive the license;

(iii) that is—
(I) not loaded; and

(II) in a locked container, or a locked firearms rack that is on a motor vehicle;
 
Don't ask, don't tell.....unless required by law. Do your homework. Safe driving.
Looks like YOU are the one that needs to "do your homework"....

I havent seen ANYTHING in the 2nd Amendment that mentions "telling" being a requirement to exercise the RIGHT to keep and bear arms lawfully....... in fact, your statement encourages infringement of that which shall NOT be infringed, suggesting that in order to be "lawful", you MUST inform if required by "law" when the "law" you are promoting is an infringement and therefore, not a "valid" "law" to begin with.....


I am 100% "LAWFUL" wherever I go, and I am always armed, and ignore/break firearm "laws" daily ON PURPOSE....

If the Constitution doesnt protect us (if the govt ignores/breaks it) then it doesnt protect them (govt) either....... Ignoring UnConstitutional "laws" is our DUTY....
 
Looks like YOU are the one that needs to "do your homework"....

I havent seen ANYTHING in the 2nd Amendment that mentions "telling" being a requirement to exercise the RIGHT to keep and bear arms lawfully....... in fact, your statement encourages infringement of that which shall NOT be infringed, suggesting that in order to be "lawful", you MUST inform if required by "law" when the "law" you are promoting is an infringement and therefore, not a "valid" "law" to begin with.....


I am 100% "LAWFUL" wherever I go, and I am always armed, and ignore/break firearm "laws" daily ON PURPOSE....

If the Constitution doesnt protect us (if the govt ignores/breaks it) then it doesnt protect them (govt) either....... Ignoring UnConstitutional "laws" is our DUTY....
you're not very swift. in some states the law requires you to inform a police officer immediately when dealing with them.IE: a traffic stop. If you don't inform you could find yourself under arrest. the laws may not be valid, you are free to be a test case.
 
you're not very swift. in some states the law requires you to inform a police officer immediately when dealing with them.IE: a traffic stop. If you don't inform you could find yourself under arrest. the laws may not be valid, you are free to be a test case.
and you are a effing idiot that cannot read or comprehend anything above a 1st grade level.... and you know absolutely NOTHING about the true "LAWS" of this country.... go spread your defeatist, bootlicking, too scared chitless to stand up for anything worthwhile crap someplace else.
 
the only true laws are the ones that impact you immediately, if your peanut sized brain cannot grasp that concept please go to a state like TX, get stopped for speeding, do not inform that you are carrying and then have the officer discover that you are armed. you can then argue your "rights" in front of a judge after spending a night or two in jail.
 
the only true laws are the ones that impact you immediately, if your peanut sized brain cannot grasp that concept please go to a state like TX, get stopped for speeding, do not inform that you are carrying and then have the officer discover that you are armed. you can then argue your "rights" in front of a judge after spending a night or two in jail.

YOU are the idiot that cannot seem to grasp any concept..... I have ALREADY, MANY TIMES done just such as you suggest, and guess what? I have Never needed to go in front of any stupid "judge" like you are shaking in your boots and peeing yourself over..... keep your fears to yourself, and leave those who stand up for themselves alone, they ALREADY KNOW what happens, and it is NOTHING like your fear addled nightmares...
 
Unconstitutional Official Acts

16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:

The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.

No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.

Jon Roland:

Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a "law", and should not be called a "law", even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.

All citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk of one's life.

Any unconstitutional act of an official will at least be a violation of the oath of that official to execute the duties of his office, and therefore grounds for his removal from office. No official immunity or privileges of rank or position survive the commission of unlawful acts. If it violates the rights of individuals, it is also likely to be a crime, and the militia duty obligates anyone aware of such a violation to investigate it, gather evidence for a prosecution, make an arrest, and if necessary, seek an indictment from a grand jury, and if one is obtained, prosecute the offender in a court of law.
 
NC and SC are both "Must Inform" states.

You might want to get a good phone app if you have a smart phone or tablet. I have 50 State CCW and it gives all kinds of good info on carry laws in the USA.
 
"must inform" is unconstitutional.... Why do you "law" lovers insist people follow unconstitutional and infringing things like this?
 
"must inform" is unconstitutional.... Why do you "law" lovers insist people follow unconstitutional and infringing things like this?

People need to know what is written in the law so they can decide for themselves whether or not they want to obey it. Stating what is written in the statues is only a piece of factual information, which can be provided without instance that people follow it. In fact the more people that know what is written in the law, maybe, will be all the more people that realize how fricken' ridiculous it is and maybe we can get to fight to have the infringements repealed.

Must inform laws do absolutely nothing to make anyone safer and only serve the purpose of providing an avenue to convict an otherwise law abiding gun owner of a crime. The more people that are informed that these laws exist and that we can get to actually think about it - the more people we can get to fight against them.
 
trveling from KY to Floridia and I plan to concealed carry on way looking for...

A person can certainly choose to conclude whether a law is Constitutional or not. But if one ignores that law, and is caught doing so, the courts may not agree and make that person's life very complicated for a long time--loss of a job, jail time, a criminal record, expensive legal fees, etc.

It's a simple matter of risk management. We are all free to make our own choices, as long as we can live with the consequences.
 
A person can certainly choose to conclude whether a law is Constitutional or not. But if one ignores that law, and is caught doing so, the courts may not agree and make that person's life very complicated for a long time--loss of a job, jail time, a criminal record, expensive legal fees, etc.

It's a simple matter of risk management. We are all free to make our own choices, as long as we can live with the consequences.

l ignore unconstitutional law because it isnt valid... not worth the paper it is printed on... l also dont allow myself to be arrested for any unconstitutional laws...

Sent from my SM-G900V using USA Carry mobile app
 
you're not very swift. in some states the law requires you to inform a police officer immediately when dealing with them.IE: a traffic stop. If you don't inform you could find yourself under arrest. the laws may not be valid, you are free to be a test case.

I Was About to say the same thing. Tell the Judge you have rights and that you are "lawful", et. And don't tell your friends to bring you cigarettes while you are doing your time; most jails are tobacco free. Oh, by the way you aren't one of those folks that make your own license plates and drivers licenses and tell the officer who stopped you that you have "sovereign immunity?" Enjoy Bubba, your cellmate.
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
49,528
Messages
610,680
Members
74,995
Latest member
tripguru365
Back
Top