Trump's AG Nominee William Barr Supports Gun Control


January 15, 2019
.
.
Action Alert from Gun Owners of America:
.
.
https://www.gunowners.org/alert11519.htm
.
.
Attorney General nominee William Barr tells Dianne Feinstein Red Flag Gun Control Laws (ERPO laws authorizing the seizure of firearms) are the "single most important thing we can do in the gun control area"
.
.
Video here:
.
.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4774130/william-barr-red-flag-gun-control-laws
.
.
Barr has been a big supporter of the PATRIOT Act and stated “the PATRIOT Act was pretty good — we should go much further."
.
Barr also supports Civil Asset Forfeiture.
 

King Kong

Banned
Irrelevant..


148dd7bc309493c2185cab9df8bbea61.jpg


4eb1b7beba47eeb74942f8ba768fbe9a.jpg



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 
^^ Yes of course. I advocate "Natural Rights" which are merely outlined in the Bill of Rights for government to obey, but the problem becomes this:
.
Definition of ERPO:
.
Sue is having an affair. She and fling want use of the furniture and house until the long battle is settled. Fling has her call leo and make a claim. After leo leaves they giggle and snuggle on the sofa before turning in for the night.
 

XD40scinNC

New member
Waiting for Ops or other Trump fluffer to show up and tell us about how the greatest president eveeeeeeeer selects only the best people for his administration.
 

BluesStringer

Les Brers
Waiting for Ops or other Trump fluffer to show up and tell us about how the greatest president eveeeeeeeer selects only the best people for his administration.

Personally, I'd rather just see 'em show up and acknowledge that Trump and his entire administration is as full of flawed, gun-grabbing, liberty-killing tyrants as any other administration in the history of this country. A vote for Trump is a vote for Planned Parenthood, just like it was with Obama, Clintoon on through at least as far back as Woodrow Wilson, which is about 60 years before Roe v Wade even happened. A vote for Trump is a vote for gun control. A vote for Trump is a vote for uncivil asset forfeiture. A vote for Trump is a vote for the end of due process, or at the very least, severely weakened protections of it. These are all undeniable truths based entirely on what has come out of Donald Trump's own mouth. Of course, they all apply equally to the vast majority of Congress-critters and Supreme Court Justices too. Why is it so difficult to acknowledge the truth for Trump supporters? Or for those still loyal to the completely usurped government for that matter? Support for government is support for all those issues too. It's disgusting how sheep-like Americans, by and large, have become. Or maybe they've always been such, and it took ~230 years before their inattention came to its natural fruition? I don't know, but it's obvious that most Americans are blind to truth anymore.

Blues
 

XD40scinNC

New member
Personally, I'd rather just see 'em show up and acknowledge that Trump and his entire administration is as full of flawed, gun-grabbing, liberty-killing tyrants as any other administration in the history of this country. A vote for Trump is a vote for Planned Parenthood, just like it was with Obama, Clintoon on through at least as far back as Woodrow Wilson, which is about 60 years before Roe v Wade even happened. A vote for Trump is a vote for gun control. A vote for Trump is a vote for uncivil asset forfeiture. A vote for Trump is a vote for the end of due process, or at the very least, severely weakened protections of it. These are all undeniable truths based entirely on what has come out of Donald Trump's own mouth. Of course, they all apply equally to the vast majority of Congress-critters and Supreme Court Justices too. Why is it so difficult to acknowledge the truth for Trump supporters? Or for those still loyal to the completely usurped government for that matter? Support for government is support for all those issues too. It's disgusting how sheep-like Americans, by and large, have become. Or maybe they've always been such, and it took ~230 years before their inattention came to its natural fruition? I don't know, but it's obvious that most Americans are blind to truth anymore.

Blues

+1

But many like Ops are drunk on the Trump Kool-Aid and are colorblind to the point they cannot/will not recognize Trumps true colors. Trump is a traitor to the constitution and the rule of law.

Trumps lies are the opioid of these phony republicans.
 

NavyLCDR

New member
+1

But many like Ops are drunk on the Trump Kool-Aid and are colorblind to the point they cannot/will not recognize Trumps true colors. Trump is a traitor to the constitution and the rule of law.

Trumps lies are the opioid of these phony republicans.

Trump has an intense narcissistic desire to be a pseudo-dictator like his idols Putin and Kim Jung Un.
 

King Kong

Banned
Too bad it won't keep you out of jail, or keep you from getting shot by the police.

“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 

XD40scinNC

New member
Trump has an intense narcissistic desire to be a pseudo-dictator like his idols Putin and Kim Jung Un.

He has said as much, praising Xi for being president for life, praised Kim for his ultimate authority, and praised Putin for his strength. He's just a spoiled brat that never got his ass kicked, or even sent to his room.
 

NavyLCDR

New member
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Sure. Hopefully the court finds on behalf of your widow and your family gets a posthumous award after every cop within 100 miles hunts you down and shoots you 20 times "in self defense". But your epitaph can be that you died defending your rights, which is extremely honorable.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,435
Messages
623,627
Members
74,270
Latest member
rlrsk8r
Top