Thug with badge

I have a section 1983 case in its early stages. The police entered my client's home without a warrant or exigent circumstance, searched and videotaped the inside of the premises, then arrested and charged my client with a crime that can't by law be committed inside a private residence. The charges were dismissed by the judge at the first appearance after arraignment. We already have a significant, but not sufficient, settlement offer.

I believe the internet and youtube have made it easier to get settlements in Section 1983 cases. 20 years ago no one would believe that a police officer would act as they do. The internet and readily accessible video has exposed just how common such incidents are. Juries are more willing to examine the evidence and listen to the victim's testimony instead of just accepting whatever the police claim as truth.

We recently had a local incident (not my case though) in which a police officer approached and maced a protester who was being cuffed by another officer. The two officers filed a report claiming that the protester was resiting arrest, spitting on them, and causing a ruckus when the second office used the pepper spray. What the two idiots didn't know is that someone had filmed the incident and they were exposed as liars.

The insurance carrier will settle that case quickly.
 
The guy with the camera was attacked by a bad cop. There is no confusion about what took place.

I have at least 4 quick questions-

1) If the camera guy had a CHL and were carrying, what do you think might have happened,
and what if it was you, a CHL holder, being attacked on your sidewalk, what would you have done?
2) If the CHL holder had protected himself and shot the bad cop, what do you think would be the outcome,
other than the CHL holder being shot to death by other officers on the scene.
3) Do the actions we saw in the video by a bad cop make a good cop any safer,
or is the good cop out there now at more risk of being shot?
4) Is the recent increase in police killings related in any way to police brutality being conveyed by this type of video?
 
I don't think one would be justified in shooting a police officer because he wants your camera.

LEO's aren't being killed by righteous citizens opposing police brutality. They are mostly killed by criminals committing crimes or involved in domestic disputes.
 
When I had rent properties HPD told me that I had to file with the police office a trespass affidavit so the LEO could enter property, if they were not investigating an incident they could be filed on for trespass, this may have changed in recent years but the photographer was on his own property and not engaged in a criminal act then he should fill criminal trespass on this Thug.
 
The vegas metro cops have a recent history of shooting ccw permit holders especially if you are in a costco or sam's club type environment...watch your back in vegas cause the cops ain't gonna!!!
 
I don't think one would be justified in shooting a police officer because he wants your camera.

LEO's aren't being killed by righteous citizens opposing police brutality. They are mostly killed by criminals committing crimes or involved in domestic disputes.

kicking someone in the face when they are down can be considered attempted murder in some states (it is an application of martial arts with a potentially lethal outcome...BTW police training counts as martial arts training)
 
I don't think one would be justified in shooting a police officer because he wants your camera.

LEO's aren't being killed by righteous citizens opposing police brutality. They are mostly killed by criminals committing crimes or involved in domestic disputes.

For reasons I do not understand, you have chosen to interpret my questions in a manner I did not suggest. Your coments have nothing to do with my questions. I never mentioned shooting a LEO because he wants my camera. I also did not suggest that LEO's are being killed by righteous citizens opposing police brutality.
 
The militarization of our police forces have led to the increased attacks on the police by the thugs in our country IMOP. It has also led to the increased poor treatment of the LAC's in our country by the police as well.
 
Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner!!! There is a reason why all of the following acts are fouls in UFC,
1- Kicking the head of a grounded opponent.
2- Strikes of any kind to the back of the head.
3- Knee strikes to the head of a grounded opponent.

Well then why didn't the referee call foul?
 
The militarization of our police forces have led to the increased attacks on the police by the thugs in our country IMOP. It has also led to the increased poor treatment of the LAC's in our country by the police as well.

LAC's? can someone enlighten me?

I don't believe I would care to live in Las Vegas.
 
I believe this thug should be fired. How can the public trust him to uphold the laws when he just broke 4 of them on video. If LEO's keep this up it will not be long before they become targets for people who have had enough and what to go out with a bang.
 
I've met law enforcement who chose their profession to do good and make a difference in the world, and I've met law enforcement who chose their profession so they could have power over other people. Unfortunately, I've met more of the latter than the former. I hope this cop gets a good measure of justice, and I'm hoping some of his co-workers do too.
 
Cops should be told, they do not controll the situation, they are merly equal participants.. It's the power that motivates this behavior....
 
That's called "suicide by cop".

No I was not thinking "suicide by cop" I was thinking "before I go I am taking as many of them with me as I can" IF you look at the officers serving warrants that got shot by the person the warrant was for. He had it in his head that they were not going to take him alive and he was going to take as many as he could with him.
 
Please explain "equal participants". Do you mean the Police are allowed to cower and call someone else to deal with a problem? Or are they tasked with dealing with the citizens complaints when summoned?
 
Please explain "equal participants". Do you mean the Police are allowed to cower and call someone else to deal with a problem? Or are they tasked with dealing with the citizens complaints when summoned?
Memorize:
  1. Police have no legal duty to protect individuals.
  2. Police have no legal liability when they fail to protect individuals.
  3. Police have virtually no physical ability to protect individuals.
When your life is in danger RIGHT NOW, you're either going to protect YOURSELF or you just aren't going to get protected AT ALL.

Anybody who tells you different is lying.
 
bighousedoc, I hope all turns out well for you. I can not believe that an sworn officer of the law would wrongfully do this to an citizen. I hope he losses his job and, you file an lawsuit agaisnt the agency that employs him. keep us posted.
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,661
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining
Back
Top