The reporter who put all the gun people in the newspaper

mmckee1952

mmckee1952

New member
Link Removed

I hope he likes this bit of news
 
Here's an idea. Lets all send him letters or even just envelopes with scraps of paper in it. DO NOT PUT A RETURN ADDRESS on the envelope and only use a 1 cent stamp. He will have a pile of postage due envelopes that he will get charged for.
 
pmb61 said:
Here's an idea. Lets all send him letters or even just envelopes with scraps of paper in it. DO NOT PUT A RETURN ADDRESS on the envelope and only use a 1 cent stamp. He will have a pile of postage due envelopes that he will get charged for.
Click to expand...

Put his address as the return address. Insufficent postage will result in returning it to the sender in this case to the reporter. Address it to the paper where he works so he will be sure to get it no matter which way the PO handles it.
 
The problem is most gun owners and those that support the constitution will not become active.
If you had several million people who would e-mail and cal his office, and send a letters to his house.
A semi truck would show up at his house with a fork lift to deliver his mail. His work switch board would be over loaded; the e-mails would stop him from doing his work.
His boss would let him go. All it would take is a few million people to send several e-mails per day, make calls going to and from work and on breaks and lunch.
The same for Feinstein had her bill, if sever million people send an e-mail several times a day for a week, and called her office in DC and her state made 10 calls a day for a week. Who would sponsor her bill if the same fate was for them??
Look at what happened in Katrina, guns were taken, in NY the Sullivan act, in DC the Gun Control Act of 1968. In these cases if five million people armed showed up and stayed till the government understood “shall not be infringed”. Look at what PETA does with only several thousand people. Who wears a fur coat today?
The problem is we want to maybe write our congressman one time, or send a small check to the NRA and complain about the anti gun group that is only a very small percent of the population.
 
Send all the mail you want. His boss isn't about to fire an employee following orders. No news story gets printed in any news paper without the permission of the editor. His boss new this story was going to be printed long before it was. The people that should really be pissed are the ones living in the gun free zones. Now the criminal element knows where the safe work zones are.
 
Who cares. I'd prefer that my name wasn't published, but if it was maybe that would discourage some sleaze-ball from breaking into my house. I don't care if my neighbors know that I own guns even though I would prefer that it wasn't publicized. If my neighbors should take offense at my gun owning right, again who cares. It's my decision and I don't care what others think especially it their opinions tromp on my individual rights as a human being.
 
bootsdeal, it could also prompt robbers to break-in and steal your guns. I'm not saying that will happen, but just a thought.
 
Ahmmm, Well, Ive for 20 envelopes with the creepy news clipping letters inside it spelling "Aint Freedom of speech a *****" glued to white paper with a quote of the 2nd amendment included being sent to his house as soon as the mail man picks them up =] Lets see what he does now.
 
Stan45 said:
The problem is most gun owners and those that support the constitution will not become active.
If you had several million people who would e-mail and cal his office, and send a letters to his house.
A semi truck would show up at his house with a fork lift to deliver his mail. His work switch board would be over loaded; the e-mails would stop him from doing his work.
His boss would let him go. All it would take is a few million people to send several e-mails per day, make calls going to and from work and on breaks and lunch.
The same for Feinstein had her bill, if sever million people send an e-mail several times a day for a week, and called her office in DC and her state made 10 calls a day for a week. Who would sponsor her bill if the same fate was for them??
Look at what happened in Katrina, guns were taken, in NY the Sullivan act, in DC the Gun Control Act of 1968. In these cases if five million people armed showed up and stayed till the government understood “shall not be infringed”. Look at what PETA does with only several thousand people. Who wears a fur coat today?
The problem is we want to maybe write our congressman one time, or send a small check to the NRA and complain about the anti gun group that is only a very small percent of the population.
Click to expand...
Agreed. See my post here - http://www.usacarry.com/forums/general-firearm-discussion/32554-gun-control-works.html
 
fuhr52 said:
Send all the mail you want. His boss isn't about to fire an employee following orders. No news story gets printed in any news paper without the permission of the editor. His boss new this story was going to be printed long before it was. The people that should really be pissed are the ones living in the gun free zones. Now the criminal element knows where the safe work zones are.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily. When an employee's liabilities are greater than their assets, the clock is ticking. But I don't think that is even the point. Strength is in numbers.

The truth is always betrayed by the money trail. I believe the best course of action is to contact the advertisers of the paper and let them know that their support of this paper results in your lack of support for their company and products. Then followup on that statement and do it. Were the masses to do that, the results would be great and swift.
 
We can even go after the Movie stars; they make an anti-gun statement we do not go to that movie with them in it. There was a list after the election of what companies contributed to BO campaign one was Progressive Insurance, how many that had them for insurance went to another company?
My guess is not many. We as a group have the power, we are just too lazy.
 
Stan45 said:
We can even go after the Movie stars; they make an anti-gun statement we do not go to that movie with them in it. There was a list after the election of what companies contributed to BO campaign one was Progressive Insurance, how many that had them for insurance went to another company?
My guess is not many. We as a group have the power, we are just too lazy.
Click to expand...

You got it Stan. We are too lazy and complacent as a group. Much of what is occurring here could be decided by which group is the least lazy. Looking at the current activity on the left, our complacency is concerning.
 
N.Y. paper doubles down on gun owners

Announces it will publish additional names, addresses
Published: 2 hours ago

(Breitbart) The New York newspaper that drew criticism for publishing the names and addresses of hundreds of legal gun permit holders is doubling down by publishing the personal information of even more law-abiding gun owners.

To great criticism, the Journal News published an interactive map showing the names and addresses of the legal gun owners in Westchester and Rockland counties just before Christmas.

Now the paper has announced it will next publish the names and addresses of permit-holders in Putnam County with an eye toward eventually politicizing the names and addresses of every gun owner in the state.

Read more at N.Y. paper doubles down on gun owners
 
Problem is if you put his address as the return address the Post Office will just send it the return address with "Returned for Postage" on it. It will be treated as if he was the original sender . He will not be charged , just given the letter and he would have to put postage on it to reship. This will just give him the chance to throw out the letters. By not putting a return address on the envelope and addressing it to him, it is processed in the mail stream and the receiver of the letter is charged at the final destination.
 
bootsdeal said:
Who cares. I'd prefer that my name wasn't published, but if it was maybe that would discourage some sleaze-ball from breaking into my house. I don't care if my neighbors know that I own guns even though I would prefer that it wasn't publicized. If my neighbors should take offense at my gun owning right, again who cares. It's my decision and I don't care what others think especially it their opinions tromp on my individual rights as a human being.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, some BGs look for targets of opportunity. If one lived close to your area and monitored when you were out of the house so he could break in and steal a "free" gun not traceable to him, it is mure likely by the actions by the "rag" that you may lose any guns you have. That is one of the dangers. The other is. as in OP above, the BGs know where they can go without being shot so target gun-free zones to rob and burglarize.
 
bootsdeal said:
Who cares. I'd prefer that my name wasn't published, but if it was maybe that would discourage some sleaze-ball from breaking into my house. I don't care if my neighbors know that I own guns even though I would prefer that it wasn't publicized. If my neighbors should take offense at my gun owning right, again who cares. It's my decision and I don't care what others think especially it their opinions tromp on my individual rights as a human being.
Click to expand...

Your post made me think of this sign! Maybe the gun owners in NY that were "outed" should put them on there lawn!
Link Removed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 262 (members: 0, guests: 262)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
49,530
Messages
610,685
Members
75,029
Latest member
fizzicist

Share this page

Back
Top