Soldier doubts eligibility, defies president's orders


festus

God Bless Our Troops!!!
A U.S. soldier on active duty in Iraq has called President Obama an "impostor" in a statement in which he affirmed plans to join as plaintiff in a challenge to Obama's eligibility to be commander in chief.

The statement was publicized by California attorney Orly Taitz who, along with her Defend Our Freedom Foundation, is working on a series of legal cases seeking to uncover Obama's birth records and other documents that would reveal whether he meets the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

"As an active-duty officer in the United States Army, I have grave concerns about the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of president of the United States," wrote Scott Easterling in a "to-whom-it-may-concern" letter.

Obama "has absolutely refused to provide to the American public his original birth certificate, as well as other documents which may prove or disprove his eligibility," Easterling wrote. "In fact, he has fought every attempt made by concerned citizens in their effort to force him to do so."

Taitz told WND she had advised Easterling to obtain legal counsel before making any statements regarding the commander-in-chief, but he insisted on moving forward. His contention is that as an active member of the U.S. military, he is required to follow orders from a sitting president, and he needs – on pain of court-martial – to know that Obama is eligible.

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 250,000 others and sign up now!

Taitz said other legal cases questioning Obama's eligibility filed by members of the military mostly have included retired officers, and courts several times have ruled they don't have standing to issue their challenge.

Easterling, however, is subject to enemy fire and certainly would have a reason to need to know the legitimacy of his orders, she argued.

"Until Mr. Obama releases a 'vault copy' of his original birth certificate for public review, I will consider him neither my Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the Office – an impostor," his statement said.

Easterling said he joined the Army at age 40 after working in Iraq as a contractor.

"I chose to work … to support my troops and then left that lucrative position when the Army raised its maximum enlistment age to 40. Upon completion of basic training, I entered Officer Candidate School and commissioned as a 2LT in August 2007. After completing the subsequent basic officer leadership courses, I was assigned to Ft. Knox and shortly thereafter deployed to Balad, Iraq," he wrote.

"I implore all service-members and citizens to contact their senators and representatives and demand that they require Mr. Obama prove his eligibility. Our Constitution and our great nation must not be allowed to be disgraced," he wrote.

Taitz said Easterling is among the plaintiffs she is assembling for a new legal action over Obama's eligibility. Others include a list of state lawmakers who also would be required in their official position to follow orders of the president.

"My conviction is such that I am compelled to join Dr. Orly Taitz's lawsuit, as a plaintiff, against Mr. Obama. As a citizen, it pains me to do this, but as an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this action," he said.

Easterling was "saluted" in a forum on Taitz' website.

"Lt. Easterling, As a retired US Army SFC, I salute you sir as a true American patriot and hero! Thank you for your unselfish service to our country. It is rare to find someone today with such moral courage to do the right thing regardless of repercussions," said one contributor.

Said another, "For your voluntary service to our country, we owe you a debt we can never pay."

As WND reported yesterday, U.S. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said during a meeting with constituents in Cullman County he has never seen proof the new president was born in Hawaii.

"Well, his father was Kenyan and they said he was born in Hawaii, but I haven't seen any birth certificate," Shelby said. "You have to be born in America to be president."

Shelby's office later stated the senator is confident of Obama's vetting process, although it did not elaborate.

WND has reported on multiple legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Here is a partial listing and status update for some of the cases over Obama's eligibility:

New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed a case on behalf of Charles Kerchner and others alleging Congress didn't properly ascertain that Obama is qualified to hold the office of president.

Philip J. Berg, a Pennsylvania Democrat, demanded that the courts verify Obama's original birth certificate and other documents proving his American citizenship. Berg's latest appeal, requesting an injunction to stop the Electoral College from selecting the 44th president, was denied.


Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.

Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, but was denied a full hearing.

Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.

Chicago attorney Andy Martin sought legal action requiring Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle to release Obama's vital statistics record. The case was dismissed by Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe.


Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.


In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.


In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The case was denied.


In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an injunction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.

California attorney Orly Taitz has brought a case, Lightfoot vs. Bowen, on behalf of Gail Lightfoot, the vice presidential candidate on the ballot with Ron Paul, four electors and two registered voters.
In addition, other cases cited on the RightSideofLife blog as raising questions about Obama's eligibility include:

In Texas, Darrel Hunter vs. Obama later was dismissed.

In Ohio, Gordon Stamper vs. U.S. later was dismissed.

In Texas, Brockhausen vs. Andrade.

In Washington, L. Charles Cohen vs. Obama.

In Hawaii, Keyes vs. Lingle, dismissed.

WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi had gone to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.
 

Last edited by a moderator:

FOXBARON

New member
It amazes me how many people in this Country are of the opinion that he won and we should get over this issue.

They have no clue as to the seriousness of this matter. If it turns out that Obama is not eligible to hold office than in my opinion, he and the Democratic Party have committed treason. They will have overthrown the Government of the United States through lies and deception.

What bothers me even more is that the majority of these people will give him a "hall pass" and say, so what, he's our President now and they will fight to keep him in office.

If he is removed from office at this point then we will have race riots, our entire political system will be turned on its head and we will be the laughing stock of the world. And we will have deserved it because our so called political leaders failed to make him prove his eligibility.

If this happens, everyone and anyone involved should not only be jailed but either be put to death or have their U.S. Citizenship revoked.

He, and he alone, can end this controversy in a matter of minutes by releasing his original birth certificate for inspection. Yet he does not and has no valid reason why not, in my opinion. He has an obligation and a duty not only to our citizens but especially to our military to release this record. He is the one who will send them in harms way and he sure as hell should be qualified to do so.

At this point the only way I will believe his origin of birth is if "the document" is forensically analyzed to prove it wasn't altered or created, because evidently we can't take his word for it
 

festus

God Bless Our Troops!!!
2nd U.S. soldier in Iraq challenges eligibility

2nd U.S. soldier in Iraq challenges eligibility
Says issue could decide if 'we are a Constitutional Republic'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: February 24, 2009
8:30 pm Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


Another U.S. soldier on active duty in Iraq is joining a challenge to President Obama's eligibility to be commander-in-chief, citing WND's report on 1st Lt. Scott Easterling, who has agreed to be a plaintiff in a lawsuit over the issue, as his inspiration.

"I was inspired by 1LT Easterling's story and am writing you to inform you that I would like to be added as a plaintiff against Obama as well if you feel it would help your case," the soldier, identified for this report only as a reservist now on active duty in Iraq.

His letter was directed to California attorney Orly Taitz who, along with her DefendOurFreedom.us Foundation, is working on a series of legal cases seeking to uncover Obama's birth records and other documents that would reveal whether he meets the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

Easterling, who confirmed separately to WND that he is questioning Obama's authority, wrote to Taitz that, "As an active-duty officer in the United States Army, I have grave concerns about the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of president of the United States."

(Story continues below)




The second soldier wrote, "I am an Army reservist who was activated last August and am currently serving with a military police battalion in Camp Bucca, Iraq. I will be here until at least June 2009."

He continued, "When I enlisted last year I had to show my birth certificate, as well as my driver's license, high school diploma, college transcripts, social security card; I also filled out loads of paperwork to include listing the names, addresses and phone numbers of my family members and had to answer any questions regarding foreign travel.

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 270,000 others and sign up now!

"I think it is reasonable for Obama to prove his citizenship status thus certifying his eligibility. I too raised my right hand and swore an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States," he told Taitz. "I believe the case you are filing could very well determine if we are in fact a Constitutional Republic or a nation of mob rule. I would be honored to be a part of your efforts."

Perhaps anticipating a wave of outrage from Obama supporters, he asked that he be given no "unnecessary publicity," although his name eventually would become public when a case is filed.

Taitz told WND she was making contingency plans that could include her travel to Iraq should a military case be brought against the soldiers who are speaking their minds about Obama.

"I told him if there is any prosecution, he can get in touch with me. I would even fly to Iraq and work with the attorney there to provide his defense," she told WND.

She said undoubtedly a part of the defense would be a demand for documentation on Obama's actual qualifications to serve as U.S. president.

WND has reported on multiple legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." While representatives for Obama has called such claims "garbage," the Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Several of the cases have involved emergency appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court in which justices have declined to hear arguments. According to a report from the Associated Press today, another such case has been rejected. The appeal by Cort Wrotnowski alleged Obama was a British subject at birth and, therefore, ineligible to be president.

There was no comment from the court, the same treatment the justices have given cases brought by several other lawyers, including Philip Berg, Leo Donofrio and Taitz.

WND reported yesterday when Easterling agreed to be a plaintiff in Taitz' case.


Soldier Scott Easterling

Taitz told WND she had advised Easterling to obtain legal counsel before making any statements regarding the commander-in-chief, but he insisted on moving forward. His contention is that as an active member of the U.S. military, he is required to follow orders from a sitting president, and he needs – on pain of court-martial – to know that Obama is eligible.

Taitz said other legal cases questioning Obama's eligibility filed by members of the military mostly have included retired officers, and courts several times have ruled they don't have standing to issue their challenge.

Easterling, however, is subject to enemy fire and certainly would have a reason to need to know the legitimacy of his orders, she argued.

"Until Mr. Obama releases a 'vault copy' of his original birth certificate for public review, I will consider him neither my Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the Office – an impostor," Easterling's statement said.

Here is a partial listing and status update for some of the cases over Obama's eligibility:

New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed a case on behalf of Charles Kerchner and others alleging Congress didn't properly ascertain that Obama is qualified to hold the office of president.

Pennsylvania Democrat Philip Berg has three cases pending, including Berg vs. Obama in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a separate Berg vs. Obama which is under seal at the U.S. District Court level and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, brought on behalf of a retired military member who could be facing recall to active duty by Obama.


Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.

Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, but was denied a full hearing.

Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.

Chicago attorney Andy Martin sought legal action requiring Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle to release Obama's vital statistics record. The case was dismissed by Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe.


Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.


In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.


In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The case was denied.


In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an injunction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.

California attorney Orly Taitz has brought a case, Lightfoot vs. Bowen, on behalf of Gail Lightfoot, the vice presidential candidate on the ballot with Ron Paul, four electors and two registered voters.
In addition, other cases cited on the RightSideofLife blog as raising questions about Obama's eligibility include:

In Texas, Darrel Hunter vs. Obama later was dismissed.


In Ohio, Gordon Stamper vs. U.S. later was dismissed.


In Texas, Brockhausen vs. Andrade.


In Washington, L. Charles Cohen vs. Obama.


In Hawaii, Keyes vs. Lingle, dismissed.
WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi had gone to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.
 

.45_4me

New member
Bravo. This guy is a true American Patriot! Why the hell are all these cases being thrown out? Seems like we are being kept from the truth. I'm not surprised though, considering that many judges are in fact liberals using the bench for their liberal agendas! Where I come from they are guilty of treason.:hang3:
 

Tex4oc

Patriot 1st
Now all we need is about 300,000 more patriots in uniform to take a stand against the usurper in chief. Then we will see if the "civilian militia" will be called to service. I hear we're about to get 100,00 Palestinian "refugees" into the U.S., I wonder if they will be pressed into service for the militia?
 

HK4U

New member
Bravo. This guy is a true American Patriot! Why the hell are all these cases being thrown out? Seems like we are being kept from the truth. I'm not surprised though, considering that many judges are in fact liberals using the bench for their liberal agendas! Where I come from they are guilty of treason.:hang3:

Because our country has been high jacked by a bunch of traitors.
 

.45_4me

New member
Because our country has been high jacked by a bunch of traitors.

I guess that's a good way to put it. Either way it pisses me off to no end! There are a whole host of idiots I would have charged with treason. I hope the next generation isn't so dam stupid. I've been working on all my cousins, nieces, nephews, and any of the younger generation's ear that I can get ahold of, for some time now. And most of them tend to not be so stupid, because they can actually see the liberal crap a lot of their teachers are attempting to jam down their throats. Though they do have some good teachers, the overwhelming majority are liberals with an agenda. So it ain't just colleges it's elementary screwls as well. They will stop at nothing to spread their idiology, not even your kids.
 

Scarecrow

New member
this is an awesome story.. I hope and pray that they will go somewhere with it.. and I will offer my support any way I can. it's not that hard to show a birth certificate, and the fact that obama has not should definately be raising some red flags. I would love to see more military people getting involved in this... afterall they are the ones who are supposed to follow orders from the president. I really want to get involved in this. I don't trust this man who is in the whitehouse one bit!
 

HK4U

New member
I guess that's a good way to put it. Either way it pisses me off to no end! There are a whole host of idiots I would have charged with treason. I hope the next generation isn't so dam stupid. I've been working on all my cousins, nieces, nephews, and any of the younger generation's ear that I can get ahold of, for some time now. And most of them tend to not be so stupid, because they can actually see the liberal crap a lot of their teachers are attempting to jam down their throats. Though they do have some good teachers, the overwhelming majority are liberals with an agenda. So it ain't just colleges it's elementary screwls as well. They will stop at nothing to spread their idiology, not even your kids.

We were blessed in that we were able to send our son to a private Christian school. Later when our daughter was school age we decided to home school. There are some good teachers out there in public school but the NEA has way to much control over everything. Things were not quite so bad when I was in school but that was the 50's and 60's.
 

gogriz91

Torch Wielding Villager
Obama and every order of legal and legislative ilk that leans left will do everything they can to bury this...it'll be tough to bring it to light given leftist judges who like to legislate from the bench.
 

ugarolla

New member
This is treason! He should be court martialed. I don't care what his politics are he's a soldier he should listen to his commanding officers. I saw an article about the Obama Eligibility thing recently and they do have a valid birth certificate they investigated it and its legit. By the way, John McCain wasn't born in the U.S. He was born in Panama on a Military base because his Dad was stationed there. This doesn't mean he wouldn't have been a qualified President.
 
W

wolfhunter

Guest
Being born on a US miliary base is a little different than being born in a foriegn country. One of the two certificates of birth that have been presented for 0bama was determined to be a document generated recently. The other merely states 0bama was born. It doesn't say where he was born (Kenya).
 

Sheldon

New member
Being born on a US miliary base is a little different than being born in a foriegn country. One of the two certificates of birth that have been presented for 0bama was determined to be a document generated recently. The other merely states 0bama was born. It doesn't say where he was born (Kenya).

Darn you stole my response, and are dead on to boot... As to the court Marshal, they will at the very least get a article 15 that is unless they are not white.... don't go there on this one believe me.... But anyone in the military have a duty to obey commands period... My case in point my youngest daughter an E4 has a Sargent that has attitude issues....

long story short, her Sargent is jealous that someone the same age and has only been in for a year is one promotion from her rank.... My daughter has her Bachelors degree, n the other went in at age 18, hence...

Anyway one of the BS things is she was not permitted by her Sargent time for lunch, and has had to go mutiple full shifts WO anything to eat... In a union environment or any work place there are specific laws governing this and it is illegal, but in the army you do as you are told period, then gripe or file on it later, any other action can and will get you into a heap of trouble.
 
W

wolfhunter

Guest
Sheldon, servicemembers are required to follow LAWFUL orders. An order from a senior rank doing their job and not violating any standing order or regulation must be obeyed. An order to do something illegal should be reported up the chain of command. An order from a lying usurper to the Presidency should be ignored. THAT is why it is so important to our servicemembers that 0bama's citizenship be verified.
 

old dude

New member
military is easyier on the troops today then they used to be back in the old days, he would have been locked up allready back then and kept from talking to the press or anyone else so no one even knew about it.he could file and complain but only by the chain of command he would still have to follow his commanders orders.even if he may be right.i think theres something fishy about obama not showing his birth papers,lots of people fileing against him things were found but dismissed by the court.
 

.45_4me

New member
Yup, McCain being born on a base outside the country because his dad was serving in the US military, more than qualifies him to serve IMHO.There's no dispute of where he was born or to whom. Never mind the fact that he has already proven that he would fight for this country. For me this was like a slap in the face to the vietnam vets! I don't think bho would put his life on the line for this country. I don't think he even likes this country, and that's why he wants to change it so drastically. Furthermore these judges should be tried for treason for NOT giving these cases proper consideration, due to their own personal views. IF nothing more than to let the facts be on record for all to see, and either prove or disprove his eligibility to be the POTUS!
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,368
Messages
622,729
Members
74,177
Latest member
gwags76
Top