Who in their right mind uses that title for an article?
A shotgun is great if you are stationary, but, in my house there are a couple corners where a shotgun is too long to make the turn without it being a liability.
And what’s wrong with the title? Someone breaks into your home and what are you going to do, invite them for milk & cookies or shoot the criminal, and if you shoot the criminal don’t you shoot them for keeps, dead men tell no tales.
A shotgun as a home defense weapon think about this, with #4 busk shot it won’t go through the wall and kill someone on the other side which a 38 or 45 might do and just the sound of you racking a round in the chamber would give the criminal real cause to bag *ss real quick. As for going around corners I agree with you though, it’s an individual preference.
If someone is that eager to kill someone other than being stupid they are in my opinion unstable. Worse than being a sheep dog they are a wanna be attack dog. You don't invite them in for cookies, nor do you draw on the girl scout selling them. Articles like this make gun owners sound like the pharmacist that shot the guy trying to run him then emptied his magazine into the guy on the floor and reloaded and shoot some more. The second amendment isn't a license to kill, the goal should be to stop the threat. If as a result the perp does, that is their fault for committing the crime. You wanting to kill someone that breaks into your house makes you no better than they are.
And for hells sake, this is them trying to sell you crap, what's next? Labeling their bullets cop killers? That worked out so well last time. That was the anti gun people being stupid, this is gun owners being stupid.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2