Midwest Doc
New member
Super Shorty 12 g Remington is my home defense weapon. Recommendations please:
Shot vs slug?
Specific shell suggestions?
Thanks
Shot vs slug?
Specific shell suggestions?
Thanks
Super Shorty 12 g Remington is my home defense weapon. Recommendations please:
Shot vs slug?
Specific shell suggestions?
Thanks
Your suggestion about recoil makes a lot of sense.
Shot vs.slug?
For home defence, with that short gun, #4 buck, recoil is manageable and unless your 2 inches away it most likely will not penatrate walls to the outside, and if by chance it did there is little chance it would still have power enough to do any damage
Super Shorty 12 g Remington is my home defense weapon. Recommendations please:
Shot vs slug?
Specific shell suggestions?
Thanks
And if it does, maby it " MOST LIKELY" wont kill your 6 year old child , or whoever, on the other side of that wall. A couple pieces of 1/2" sheet rock doesnt make such a great barrier. But to end all discussion, why not set up a little test by placing several pieces of wallboard a few inches apart and fire different loads, from YOUR gun,from say eight feet away and see how much penetration each load provides. Then you will have some actual facts rather than ,"most likely", or "prolly", or "might", or "might not". Knowledge is a wonderful thing, guessing sucks when you are using a gun around your family or friends.
By the way, I have performed this test with my Mossy, at the suggestion from a member of another forum i visit, and I KNOW exactly what my load, from my gun, will and wont do. And even the hand loaded, low power load I use under certain circunstances will over penetrate interior walls.
JMDAO
2DP
For a long time, I was of Twodollarpistol's school of thought. I figured at inside-the-house ranges, No. 4 or No. 6 shot would be effective without over penetrating.
A crusty old Marine working in a gun store told me that for close range work the Marines used No. 2 buckshot because that provided the most pellets with enough mass to achieve adequate penetration.
More recently, I have seen a video in which Massad Ayoob recommended No. 4 buck for the same reason.
If you haven't seen the tests and discussion about shotgun rounds on the Box O' Truth, check it out:
The Box O' Truth #3 - The Shotgun Meets the Box O' Truth - Page 1
The Box O' Truth dude concluded that birdshot, including heavy shot like No. 6 and No. 4, is for birds. He was not satisfied even with the lighter buckshot loads. He says any shot that will be effective against a human will penetrate numerous layers of sheetrock.
Remington's website provides some helpful information, follow this link and click on "Specifications":
Link Removed
I emailed Remington and asked about the weight of individual pellets in their buckshot loads and this is what they told me:
Weight per pellet:
#4 buck-20.83 gr
#3 buck-25.59 gr
#1 buck-21.17 gr
0 buck- 39.77 gr
00 buck-48.61 gr
000 buck- 51.47
Everybody won't come to the same conclusion and what Twodollarpistol said about determining for yourself has a lot of merit. Based on everything discussed, including the information provided by Remington, I conclude that Ayoob is right. 4 buck is 27 .25 caliber, 21 gr pellets, traveling 1325 fps. If that doesn't "git 'r done," shoot twice. I wouldn't go any lighter than that, but even considering the Box O' Truth test, I am satisfied that it is adequate. Of course, YMMV.
Good catch! Not being familiar with the specific weapon mentioned, I did not realize we were talking about a super-short barrel. Yeah, I know what assuming does!...NOBODY has any actual, ballistic data from any 12 gauge rds, any shot ammo comeing from that 10 inch barrel...
Good catch! Not being familiar with the specific weapon mentioned, I did not realize we were talking about a super-short barrel. Yeah, I know what assuming does!