Deanimator
New member
- Ohio doesn't register gun owners.
- Ohio doesn't register guns.
- Concealed Handgun License information is linked to vehicle registration.
Ohio local PD would also know if you ever bought more than one handgun in a seven day period from one FFL. And that would include make, model, and serial number. Some PDs just look at it then shred. Others may store the data.
- Ohio doesn't register gun owners.
- Ohio doesn't register guns.
- Concealed Handgun License information is linked to vehicle registration.
Until someone is beating the hell out of her and you intervene. Karma's a b!tch.The funniest thing is that we're neighbors, but she hasn't realized that yet.
I'm fairly certain Washington doesn't have firearms registration which makes this entire story suspect to me.
Here's the kicker. State law also requires a copy of the Application to Purchase Handguns to be delivered to the Washington State Department of Licensing, who keeps a database of every handgun sold by a dealer in Washington State, make model and serial number, and all the information associated with the sale including identity of the buyer, driver's license number and CPL number if used. Thus, given any one piece of info, all the other info can be obtained including exactly which handguns were purchased from dealers in Washington by make, model and serial number.
Is this relatively new?
Is this relatively new? About 5 years ago I had my house burglarized and a handgun was stolen. At the time I naively wasn't keeping track of the serial numbers. When I made the police report, they asked me for the serial number, and I told them I didn't have it. They told me they didn't keep any direct record of handgun ownership and that the only way I could get it was to go to the dealer I bought it at and have them check the 4473. Obviously, they could have done this but I guess they just wanted me to do the leg work myself. Point being, when they responded to my house to take the report, as far as they told me, they had no idea that I owned guns or what the make, model, or serial was and would have to go through the same steps I would to get it.
Looking at the RCWs, it seems like that the ability of the Department of Licensing to keep the data was effective in 1994.
Hey Navy! Glad to see your back. We here have missed your posts!Looking at the RCWs, it seems like that the ability of the Department of Licensing to keep the data was effective in 1994.
Navy, long time no hear. How are you?Looking at the RCWs, it seems like that the ability of the Department of Licensing to keep the data was effective in 1994.
"The other day I was listening to Kittitas County [WA] Dispatch send a Deputy to a reported domestic violence call"
I think, if I was a cop on the way to a DV, I would most definitely want to know if there were firearms in the house. Legal in all states? Do know, but I would want to know! I like being alive. It's a failing, I know.:wink:Going back to the original post, and being of the opinion that all cops are not Nazi's, here's a theory based on the following quote:
What if the info is available, but there are only certain instances where the dispatcher will go to the added effort of securing this info for the safety of the officer on scene? If this is the case, and it was protocol for them to do this only for certain calls (DV would definitely be one of those), is this a problem?
-
Before you jump down my throat, I'm undecided. If I was the cop that info would be handy. On the other hand, if I am going to a DV call I'm gonna assume the worst anyway and prepare for it.
-
Thoughts? Is the scenario described possible? If so is it a problem?
I like being alive. It's a failing, I know.:wink:
Going back to the original post, and being of the opinion that all cops are not Nazi's, here's a theory based on the following quote:
What if the info is available, but there are only certain instances where the dispatcher will go to the added effort of securing this info for the safety of the officer on scene? If this is the case, and it was protocol for them to do this only for certain calls (DV would definitely be one of those), is this a problem?
-
Before you jump down my throat, I'm undecided. If I was the cop that info would be handy. On the other hand, if I am going to a DV call I'm gonna assume the worst anyway and prepare for it.
-
Thoughts? Is the scenario described possible? If so is it a problem?
Hey Navy! Glad to see your back. We here have missed your posts!
Navy, long time no hear. How are you?
Going back to the original post, and being of the opinion that all cops are not Nazi's, here's a theory based on the following quote:
What if the info is available, but there are only certain instances where the dispatcher will go to the added effort of securing this info for the safety of the officer on scene? If this is the case, and it was protocol for them to do this only for certain calls (DV would definitely be one of those), is this a problem?
-
Before you jump down my throat, I'm undecided. If I was the cop that info would be handy. On the other hand, if I am going to a DV call I'm gonna assume the worst anyway and prepare for it.
-
Thoughts? Is the scenario described possible? If so is it a problem?
I think, if I was a cop on the way to a DV, I would most definitely want to know if there were firearms in the house. Legal in all states? Do know, but I would want to know! I like being alive. It's a failing, I know.:wink: