‘Professor’ Calls for Mexican Revolt in America
- Thread starter HK4U
- Start date
W
wolfhunter
Guest
The war on Imperialism? There are no empires being built today.
The war on Capitalism? Where does the "professor" think the money for his salary come from?
The war on Capitalism? Where does the "professor" think the money for his salary come from?
theicemanmpls
Banned
I have a suggestion.
Why don't we just have a seperate forum for Alex Jones products? It would save some of the members here the trouble of cutting and pasting the links.
It would also save those of us who know Alex Jones from clicking that forum.
leasantry:
Why don't we just have a seperate forum for Alex Jones products? It would save some of the members here the trouble of cutting and pasting the links.
It would also save those of us who know Alex Jones from clicking that forum.
leasantry:
HK4U
New member
I have a suggestion.
Why don't we just have a separate forum for Alex Jones products? It would save some of the members here the trouble of cutting and pasting the links.
It would also save those of us who know Alex Jones from clicking that forum.
How about a separate forum for fools like you? Can I get a second somebody?
Itstjs
New member
I dont get it...He thinks that Americans are trying to keep Mexicans out, its not true, we just want them to come here legally, AND stop the drugs from crossing the border....Hes got too much hate in his heart. He needs to wake up, there is no Imperialism here, we didnt kill 40,000 Mexicans, they died trying to sneak into this country, go through the legal channels, and you wont die, or worry about getting shipped back.
Dave1climber
New member
As a new member I hope I don’t offend anyone, however I would defend free speech, but not the content that the professor is spewing.
OUTTAHERE
New member
New Immigration Laws: Read to the bottom or you will miss the message...
1 There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
2. All ballots will be in this nation's language.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
3. All government business will be conducted in our language.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
6 Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs. Any burden will be deported.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
8. If foreigners come here and buy land... options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
9.. Foreigners may have no protests; no demonstrations, no waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, no bad-mouthing our president or his policies. These will lead to deportation.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted &, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All assets will be taken from you.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Too strict?......
The above laws are the current immigration laws of MEXICO !!!
These sound fine to me, NOW, how can we get these laws to be America's immigration laws??
WAKE UP, AMERICA - we are about to lose our country.........
1 There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
2. All ballots will be in this nation's language.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
3. All government business will be conducted in our language.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
6 Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs. Any burden will be deported.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
8. If foreigners come here and buy land... options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
9.. Foreigners may have no protests; no demonstrations, no waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, no bad-mouthing our president or his policies. These will lead to deportation.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted &, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All assets will be taken from you.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Too strict?......
The above laws are the current immigration laws of MEXICO !!!
These sound fine to me, NOW, how can we get these laws to be America's immigration laws??
WAKE UP, AMERICA - we are about to lose our country.........
theicemanmpls
Banned
Sounds very oppresive. This is why many of the mexican people wish to live at least part time in the USA.
Perhaps Hillary should work with mexico to strenthen it's economy instead of sending it's workforce north.
Maybe help them clean up their crooked Guv-ment also?
Want change? Vote the politicians for life out of a job.
Change it from within.
Conservative Wife & Mom
New member
+1. If those immigration laws are good enough for Mexico, they're certainly good enough for the U.S.A.
leasantry:Dave1climber
New member
leasantry:leasantry:leasantry:leasantry:leasantry:Mexicans wish to avoid oppression on a "part-time" basis? Interesting concept...
Hillary Clinton wouldn't have a clue as to how to strengthen any country's economy. Nothwistanding the fact that I question whether that's even in her job description. How about Mexico takes care of its own economy with its own money?
We're gonna help them clean up their crooked government? Yeah, we're the experts in "government with integrity" alright. You surely didn't mean to suggest that say, Hillary, would head this up? Again, Mexico can clean up its own sh#t-house gov't and we'll attempt to take care of ours.
Voting politicians for life out of a job is a guiding principle that I can agree with. All of them...out! Hopefully, we can change it from within but I'm starting to have real serious doubts.
NDS
New member
{Uh, rant off por favor ...}
Do y'all think it would be possible to return to the topic of this thread for a moment? If you're interested in letting your opinion of this person's remarks be known to his employers I copied this from another forum:
Calguns.net - View Single Post - LA Teacher calls for Raza revolt against US.
{Okay -- rant on!}
And BTW -- are you people seriously stating we should adopt Mexican law for the reason that it's more restrictive than US law? I find that line of reasoning bizarre; I'd like to see the US return to following our own Constitution and leave other nations their own law.
I realize this won't be welcome.
Do y'all think it would be possible to return to the topic of this thread for a moment? If you're interested in letting your opinion of this person's remarks be known to his employers I copied this from another forum:
link to post quoted:
Calguns.net - View Single Post - LA Teacher calls for Raza revolt against US.
{Okay -- rant on!}
And BTW -- are you people seriously stating we should adopt Mexican law for the reason that it's more restrictive than US law? I find that line of reasoning bizarre; I'd like to see the US return to following our own Constitution and leave other nations their own law.
Boomboy007
New member
I think that the video is HILARIOUS!
As a staunch defender of free speech, I say let the idiot prattle on. :sarcastic:
In the same way that the fools who lead groups like the Ku Klux Klan and the black liberation organizations operate, I say it is better to let the idiots say what they say where everyone can hear the ignorance they spew, as well as be able to deride and ridicule them at will. Let them commit acts of violence toward others, and they shall suffer the consequences.
I think that imbeciles are much like a bad fungus: Airing it out in the sunshine will go a long way towards eliminating the problem. If you instead try to suppress or cover up the issue, the fungus will spread like wildfire. We will ALWAYS be cursed with a certain (hopefully small) percentage of idiots and racists. Best to let them gather in a corner by themselves and leave the vast majority of normal people to their lives.
I thought it incredibly amusing that behind the guy spewing the hateful racist vitriol (can you imagine a white group calling themselves "The Race"?) was a big sign saying "Hate Speech is not Free Speech".
Methinks they do not understand hate speech OR free speech. :laugh:
As a staunch defender of free speech, I say let the idiot prattle on. :sarcastic:
In the same way that the fools who lead groups like the Ku Klux Klan and the black liberation organizations operate, I say it is better to let the idiots say what they say where everyone can hear the ignorance they spew, as well as be able to deride and ridicule them at will. Let them commit acts of violence toward others, and they shall suffer the consequences.
I think that imbeciles are much like a bad fungus: Airing it out in the sunshine will go a long way towards eliminating the problem. If you instead try to suppress or cover up the issue, the fungus will spread like wildfire. We will ALWAYS be cursed with a certain (hopefully small) percentage of idiots and racists. Best to let them gather in a corner by themselves and leave the vast majority of normal people to their lives.
I thought it incredibly amusing that behind the guy spewing the hateful racist vitriol (can you imagine a white group calling themselves "The Race"?) was a big sign saying "Hate Speech is not Free Speech".
Methinks they do not understand hate speech OR free speech. :laugh:
Ringo
A WATCHMAN
theicemanmpls
Banned
JJ, it was just a suggestion. I was only assuming it was part of Hillarys job. Do I think she is capable of the task? By no means. Hillary is still suffering PTSD from the sniper attack. I have no idea how to keep the mexicans contained within their borders. As long as their are jobs that invite them they will come. If they had jobs in their own country, they might stay there. Building a wall, or a moat is not going to happen. The legal mexicans that are here are organized, and they vote.
Why do you think a wall (or other means to secure the border) won't ever happen? I know the outlook is bleak at the present but things can change. Hopefully the Arizona law will start to force that to happen. IMO a big part of the reason it was passed was to force the federal government to do SOMETHING, though in my opinion they have the right to pass the law to secure their border regardless of any other motives. My favorite comment on it was from "Sheriff Joe" who said "The law is no big deal to us in Maricopia County - we've been doing that for years."
As far as Mexico's economy that is their problem. I see your point but we need to focus our resources here, not in another country. Ive never agreed with this idea that the rest of the world is our problem. If we can help than fine but I don't think we have a responsibility.
Unfortunately we as a country have gotten stupider and lazier, and have begun to go to actors, activists and other "famous people" to get our opinions nstead of thinking for ourselves.
HK4U
New member
Here is a reply to an e-mail I sent the school board.
This response is being sent to you as a result of your recent comments to the Los Angeles Unified school District.
Thank you for your comments regarding the personal activities of one our teachers. Let me assure you that we have reviewed the videotape extensively for any violations of District policy and we have come to the following conclusions:
The videotape was made at a public meeting that took place three years ago.
The teacher was apparently exercising his right to freedom of speech provided to him as a guarantee under the Constitution of the United States of America.
The activity took place at a non LAUSD site (UCLA).
Given that the video is three years old we have no way of determining whether the student referred to in the video was an actual student or former student of the teacher.
The teacher in question was participating on his personal time and the views he expressed during the gathering were his own and do not represent the opinions and views of the District.
There appears to be no direct violation of District policy.
Additionally, the teacher’s rights for political activity are protected under our bargaining agreement with the United Teachers of Los Angeles (please see below):
ARTICLE VII
NON-DISCRIMINATION
1.0 Pursuant to applicable Federal and State laws, the District and UTLA agree not to discriminate against any employee based upon race, color, religion, creed, national origin, gender, age, marital status, sexual orientation, disability, or political or UTLA affiliation, and to have due regard for employees' privacy and constitutional rights as citizens.
Consequently it has been determined by our legal department that any punitive actions taken against this teacher for conducting his personal activities on his own time and under the given circumstances would be a violation of his Constitutional rights and our bargaining agreement.
As to the issue of the lessons taught in the classroom by this teacher, Mr. Gochez, like many LAUSD teachers, is required to submit a lesson plan to his principal in advance and his course work is consistently monitored to ensure that he adheres his proposed lesson plan.
We thank you for your concern and comments on this matter and assure you that we will continue to monitor this situation closely to ensure that District policies are maintained and adhered to by all District staff.
This response is being sent to you as a result of your recent comments to the Los Angeles Unified school District.
Thank you for your comments regarding the personal activities of one our teachers. Let me assure you that we have reviewed the videotape extensively for any violations of District policy and we have come to the following conclusions:
The videotape was made at a public meeting that took place three years ago.
The teacher was apparently exercising his right to freedom of speech provided to him as a guarantee under the Constitution of the United States of America.
The activity took place at a non LAUSD site (UCLA).
Given that the video is three years old we have no way of determining whether the student referred to in the video was an actual student or former student of the teacher.
The teacher in question was participating on his personal time and the views he expressed during the gathering were his own and do not represent the opinions and views of the District.
There appears to be no direct violation of District policy.
Additionally, the teacher’s rights for political activity are protected under our bargaining agreement with the United Teachers of Los Angeles (please see below):
ARTICLE VII
NON-DISCRIMINATION
1.0 Pursuant to applicable Federal and State laws, the District and UTLA agree not to discriminate against any employee based upon race, color, religion, creed, national origin, gender, age, marital status, sexual orientation, disability, or political or UTLA affiliation, and to have due regard for employees' privacy and constitutional rights as citizens.
Consequently it has been determined by our legal department that any punitive actions taken against this teacher for conducting his personal activities on his own time and under the given circumstances would be a violation of his Constitutional rights and our bargaining agreement.
As to the issue of the lessons taught in the classroom by this teacher, Mr. Gochez, like many LAUSD teachers, is required to submit a lesson plan to his principal in advance and his course work is consistently monitored to ensure that he adheres his proposed lesson plan.
We thank you for your concern and comments on this matter and assure you that we will continue to monitor this situation closely to ensure that District policies are maintained and adhered to by all District staff.
New Threads
-
-
Mystic Seaport Museum, Shelburne Museum Vermont
- Started by Harry45255
- Replies: 0
-
-
Reloading Newbie Here—What’s the Real Cost Advantage?
- Started by michaelstrahan
- Replies: 4
-
Members online
No members online now.