Many agencies changed to Federal HST and Win Ranger T long ago.
Not sure what your point is...the FC-40HST (Federal #P40HST1 .40 S&W 180 gr) is what I carry...and what "many DoD and other federal agencies" use as I said previously. Glad to see you concur, Gordon. :wink:
Now that I look at those charts again, I see the brands weren't rank ordered as I originally assumed; thus, my note that my favored Federals didn't do so well. Yea, I know what 'assume' stands for and that's what I get for going directly to the .40 S&W section without reading the capitalized caveat. :sad:
Agree that the .45 Auto posts some
very impressive numbers for law enforcement departments although I'm not aware of any mass exodus to the round other than the stalled USSOCOM program which is unlikely to be funded in these budget-cutting times. Some detractors I see from widespread movement to the .45 ACP by DoD as well as more specialized agencies would include joint service standardization, weapon size, weight, smaller magazine capacity in many competitive pistols, large grip size makes shooting (well) more difficult for small-handed shooters, reduced effectiveness against the modern body armor many combatants as well as BGs now wear (despite good ballistics gel and heavy cloth penetration numbers).
The folks at Tampa had a very parochial view of the requirements for a new pistol when it was the Spec Ops Combat Pistol program. But then when they became the executive agent for the service-wide program, they did a less than stellar job of studying what kind of a pistol the non-snake-eaters would need and could use effectively. Subsequently the entire program was thrown into disarray when Congress ordered another study and funds weren't made available to continue prototyping/development. And now it looks like the M9 will continue to be the nation's sidearm.
Lastly, of course the cute colloquialism you cite is always correct.