Perfect example of someone that should not be allowed to have a weapon!
- Thread starter REB1969
- Start date
Michael Ramsey
New member
You get out and drive like an idiot, act like an idiot, then assault someone, and they get out and whoop you a$$.... Take it and learn to adjust your attitude....
Don't get up from a deserved butt whoopin and grab a gun cause you've just been shown that acting like an idiot will get ya hurt. Now he and his wife will get some butt hurt in prison hopefully.
Don't get up from a deserved butt whoopin and grab a gun cause you've just been shown that acting like an idiot will get ya hurt. Now he and his wife will get some butt hurt in prison hopefully.
fnsmoak
New member
So A teenage NEIGHBOR cuts you off.
... For lack of something more important or intelligent to do (like calling the neighbor's parent, or the Sheriff, or simply continuing on TO WORK), you follow the teenager for FORTY MINUTES, stewing, seething, steaming, along with your (now accomplice, antagonist) wife. This shows lack of: intelligence, maturity, sense of intelligent priorities, connection to reality.
It will be as easy as falling down steps for the prosecutor to persuade the jury that you took trouble to Trouble, for the sake of TROUBLE.
The wife is an accomplice; conspiracy to, aiding, abetting criminal conduct & BATTERY of High&Aggravated nature. Not including the intentional introduction of a firearm into an aggravated situation.
The CRIMINAL (Attacker) is the driver that approaches someone else' vehicle and throws a punch into the vehicle.
The Hero is the kid that makes it around the truck in time to thwart a second punch against a pinned down victim, DEFENDING his friend/driver/brother, whatever. But it looked like the attacked driver would probably have done pretty good all by himself.
A defense for the attacker would be video recorded during the 40 minute "chase" depicting ill-behavior from the claimed offensive driver and riders toward the Attacker's vehicle. Depositions from numerous neighbors describing the teenagers residence as known spot for bad actors, disruptive parties, etc., wouldn't hurt.
I feel this dude is in for a rough time, and his & wife's attorneys will live pretty well this Summer.
The 40-minute follow might invoke other charges similar or including a charge of Stalking, Harassment, or others etc.
Of course, this is just an opinion.
YMMV
Please be mindful of how YOU act toward other drivers when your children are riding with you. THEY SEE EVERYTHING, and mimic most of it.
GUNSMOAK.com
... For lack of something more important or intelligent to do (like calling the neighbor's parent, or the Sheriff, or simply continuing on TO WORK), you follow the teenager for FORTY MINUTES, stewing, seething, steaming, along with your (now accomplice, antagonist) wife. This shows lack of: intelligence, maturity, sense of intelligent priorities, connection to reality.
It will be as easy as falling down steps for the prosecutor to persuade the jury that you took trouble to Trouble, for the sake of TROUBLE.
The wife is an accomplice; conspiracy to, aiding, abetting criminal conduct & BATTERY of High&Aggravated nature. Not including the intentional introduction of a firearm into an aggravated situation.
The CRIMINAL (Attacker) is the driver that approaches someone else' vehicle and throws a punch into the vehicle.
The Hero is the kid that makes it around the truck in time to thwart a second punch against a pinned down victim, DEFENDING his friend/driver/brother, whatever. But it looked like the attacked driver would probably have done pretty good all by himself.
A defense for the attacker would be video recorded during the 40 minute "chase" depicting ill-behavior from the claimed offensive driver and riders toward the Attacker's vehicle. Depositions from numerous neighbors describing the teenagers residence as known spot for bad actors, disruptive parties, etc., wouldn't hurt.
I feel this dude is in for a rough time, and his & wife's attorneys will live pretty well this Summer.
The 40-minute follow might invoke other charges similar or including a charge of Stalking, Harassment, or others etc.
Of course, this is just an opinion.
YMMV
Please be mindful of how YOU act toward other drivers when your children are riding with you. THEY SEE EVERYTHING, and mimic most of it.
GUNSMOAK.com
golocx4
Got Beretta's?
One of the first lessons I learned about firearms was from my dad. He said Sometimes carrying a gun makes people feel ten feet tall. Don't fall into that trap, it always ends up badly.
... whether he had a gun or not is irrelevant. he acted the way he did because he was sure that he would be the only one armed in the confrontation.
had he thought the other person is likely to also be armed he would have dropped it and continued on his merry way. more guns in the hands of more people would have prevented this display.
an armed society is a polite society.
had he thought the other person is likely to also be armed he would have dropped it and continued on his merry way. more guns in the hands of more people would have prevented this display.
an armed society is a polite society.
The_Outlaw
~The Dude Abides~
Stupid is as stupid does....
This moron and his clueless wife both need to spend some time in jail imho.
I am dumbfounded tht this maniac (with his wife and kid in the vehicle) decided to follow these teenagers for 40 friggin minutes to their home!
An then this genius decided to physically assault the teenagers on private property!
This idiot is lucky that it was not my son and our home, because he probably would not have driven away from the scene quite so easily.
This moron and his clueless wife both need to spend some time in jail imho.
I am dumbfounded tht this maniac (with his wife and kid in the vehicle) decided to follow these teenagers for 40 friggin minutes to their home!
An then this genius decided to physically assault the teenagers on private property!
This idiot is lucky that it was not my son and our home, because he probably would not have driven away from the scene quite so easily.
Gallstones
New member
Andrew49417
New member
This guy was completely in the wrong on all counts. The two kids met force with force and stopped when he was out of the fight. They retreated and he pursued them with a gun and persisted the attack using the firearm. He left the scene, returned, and recklessly discharged his gun a second time. HE should not be allowed to own any guns. He obviously carries (probably illegally) for the wrong reasons.
Then the attorney on the video turns it around and calls it a vicious attack by the boys? That is what is wrong with this country right there.
Then the attorney on the video turns it around and calls it a vicious attack by the boys? That is what is wrong with this country right there.
Gallstones
New member
And then when the teenagers defended themselves, the woman witnessing her husband engaging in an aggressive criminal act, thinks it is a good idea to hand him a firearm.
These people cast a pall on gun owners, the majority of whom are law abiding and competent, they taint us all. I hope they get the book throw at them with prejudice. I hate this $h1t.
This reads like liberal sarcasm.
not at all. I think the reason the guy acted like he did from the very beginning is because he thought he was the only one with a weapon.
New Threads
-
-
-
-
-
Mystic Seaport Museum, Shelburne Museum Vermont
- Started by Harry45255
- Replies: 0
Members online
No members online now.