I just left this comment on the video:
Now, there is a character limit that wouldn't allow me to explain that I strongly encourage getting and refreshing training, but I was responding to the statement about a "valid requirement" that the young lady spoke of. I also checked her channel page and she hasn't posted anything for over a year, so there's no telling how firmly her new-found enthusiasm for freedom was planted in her brain by her visit to Dixie. And if I'm not mistaken, buying a gun in NYC is a very arduous process, if it's possible at all, which is why I asked her if she had bought a gun yet. There are very few people, male or female, with the tenacity to go through what
Emily Miller went through to get permission to simply own a gun, and she still can't carry it, nor would the young lady in the video be able to carry if she was able to buy one in NYC.
In one way, I am happy about her seeming transformation about guns and gun control. On the other hand, her video really only speaks to a new-found tolerance for people exercising their rights by owning and/or carrying guns in a state many hundreds of miles away from her home. I really couldn't care any less that some former anti-gunner "tolerates" the free exercising of my rights by me.
I don't have anything against the lady per se, but I don't think her video represents any paradigm shift in how anti-gunners are looking at gun rights in this country. I'm not even convinced that it represents a
lasting paradigm shift in her own thinking. I hope she'll reply to my comment so we can have a clue about that.
Blues