Oregon voters


DGeorge

New member
Interesting dillema for the Sheriff.

Link Removed
 

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137: “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.”

Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105: “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.”

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262: “If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.”
b80f191fbfdf247b012f012eb95359ff.jpg
 
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137: “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.”

Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105: “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.”

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262: “If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.”
b80f191fbfdf247b012f012eb95359ff.jpg


I do agree with all you posted here. But we have elected morons and appointed stooges who hate the the US Constitution because it limits them. Because of that I fully expect the morons will FALL on anyone who will not fall in lockstep with them!!
 
Heck, there isn't a single prosecutor or law enforcement officer in Washington state enforcing our background check infringement.
 

New Threads

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
49,543
Messages
611,260
Members
74,964
Latest member
sigsag1
Back
Top