BIGJOHN621
New member
This will fix all the crime....oh, wait...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46438093/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/#.Tz-n37TmJ34
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46438093/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/#.Tz-n37TmJ34
Why should even the cops have guns? It works so well in England!
In all honesty, if there were a way to guarantee (and I do mean guarantee, not 90%, not even 99%, but guarantee) that all guns are removed from the country, other than the military, I vote for it. Not enthusiastically, because I like target shooting, but if a way was found to truly guarantee, sure. But it ain't gonna happen.
Just as if we could guarantee that every country got rid of all nuclear weapons, I'd be for getting rid of ours. But as long as even one "rogue" has it, we should have it, too (reduce our numbers, sure. Even 1000 is literally overkill.) Same goes with guns. As long as one criminal has one, I want one too.
And Australia...and England...and...Why should even the cops have guns? It works so well in England!.
Same here...... Same goes with guns. As long as one criminal has one, I want one too.
Like the old saying goes outlaw guns and only the crooks will have guns!.
As does the first amendment which does not grant us the "right to free speech" (We are born with that right!)The biggest issue today is that a government for the people, by the people is lost. The people have the power, and the Constitution was written to RESTRICT GOVERNMENT not to restrict the people. The strict-construction or loose-construction debate has been going on every since it was written, but the fact still remains that the document is in place to RESTRICT THE OPPRESSIVE POWER OF THE GOVERNMENT. It is sickening to hear that SCOTUS states that the Second Amendment grants the people....NO! The second amendment restricts the government from limiting arms and so on. Once this way of thinking comes back the way it should, we can get back to having a decent country.
When I heard the story at FoxNews, I said to my husband...now the brady bunch will push to eliminate guns at Homeland Security. He said....Clinton pushed to remove guns from the army so what happened at Fort Hood?
When I heard the story at FoxNews, I said to my husband...now the brady bunch will push to eliminate guns at Homeland Security. He said....Clinton pushed to remove guns from the army so what happened at Fort Hood?
Why should even the cops have guns? It works so well in England!
In all honesty, if there were a way to guarantee (and I do mean guarantee, not 90%, not even 99%, but guarantee) that all guns are removed from the country, other than the military, I vote for it. Not enthusiastically, because I like target shooting, but if a way was found to truly guarantee, sure. But it ain't gonna happen.
Just as if we could guarantee that every country got rid of all nuclear weapons, I'd be for getting rid of ours. But as long as even one "rogue" has it, we should have it, too (reduce our numbers, sure. Even 1000 is literally overkill.) Same goes with guns. As long as one criminal has one, I want one too.
If we lived in your world we'd still be an English colony.