TruckTurner68
Chaplain
Son get your gun! Your thoughts?
"Sire, the peasants are revolting."
"They were always revolting. Now they're rebelling."
Through unfair (and largely unregulated) business practices, many large corporations, especially the multi-national variety, have been sucking a lot of the world's wealth from the many, and concentrating it in the hands of a few.
While I'm generally not a fan of the "rob from the rich and give to the poor" approach - certainly SOMETHING needs to be done. Big Corporations need to be made to be better citizens. This means corporate investment in social infrastructure, and better sharing of earnings with labor force, so on and so forth. (As opposed to exploiting the Third World for the cheapest labor, and paying all but the top-tier employees just enough to struggle by.)
Big Corporate lobbies for a stronger government. Big Government passes policies that are favorable to Big Corporate. It's a vicious cycle. And MAKE NO MISTAKE, BOTH PARTIES ARE IN ON IT, bought and paid for.
People are FED UP. And that's why this movement is going on.
My concern is that, if there are police or National Guard crackdowns, this may no longer be a peaceful movement. And while I am in favor of the armed overthrow of tyranny, there is always a huge risk of the incoming power being worse than the outgoing power. And some of these folks who are protesting lean way too socialist for my taste.
As for me - I'm not taking to the streets yet. But I'm keeping my guns clean and ammunition stocked.
I think anger directed at Congress is somewhat misdirected. Any anger toward what Congress has done or not done would be more rightfully directed at those Americans who, most likely, have NEVER participated in their own government OTHER THAN voting! After all, you give people a job where the employees actually write the rules, have an almost unlimited amount of money to spend and have NO oversight or supervision? What do you expect?The anger needs to be directed to the 535 people that are responsible for the laws that have created this mess. Class warfare is not going to solve anything, but that's the card the progressive liberals insist on playing. In my opinion any wealth you work hard to create for your self is yours to do with as you please. I don't care how much that is. All these winners going after corporations, why aren't they complaining about the millions that sports figures make or Hollywood. Our about the millions our elected representatives make. They don't attack our poor reps because they don't want to bite the hand that feeds them. Just my $0.02.
You have exactly what we have now. It's time for the employer, us, to clean house. I fail to see how anger at congress is misdirected. It's congress that is trying to misdirect the issue by encouraging class warfare. It's more of the "it's not our fault, it's those greedy rich people". Those greedy rich people have every right to the money they earn. Also every right to spend it as they choose. You and I may not agree but it's not our money. I don't want someone telling me how I should spend the money I earn and don't think you do either. On the other hand the government takes the money they spend and gives it to the non producers of society. There are plenty of non profit organization that will take care of the non producers but why should they. The government jumps in and takes over because they don't like the strings the privates attach to there handouts. The government has no strings attached so we have generations of people that have leaned how to work the system and are making a good income sitting on their butts doing nothing.
That post could be construed as a direct threat of gun violence against big corporations. It also screams socialism.Through unfair (and largely unregulated) business practices, many large corporations, especially the multi-national variety, have been sucking a lot of the world's wealth from the many, and concentrating it in the hands of a few.
While I'm generally not a fan of the "rob from the rich and give to the poor" approach - certainly SOMETHING needs to be done. Big Corporations need to be made to be better citizens. This means corporate investment in social infrastructure, and better sharing of earnings with labor force, so on and so forth. (As opposed to exploiting the Third World for the cheapest labor, and paying all but the top-tier employees just enough to struggle by.)
Big Corporate lobbies for a stronger government. Big Government passes policies that are favorable to Big Corporate. It's a vicious cycle. And MAKE NO MISTAKE, BOTH PARTIES ARE IN ON IT, bought and paid for.
People are FED UP. And that's why this movement is going on.
As for me - I'm not taking to the streets yet. But I'm keeping my guns clean and ammunition stocked.
That's not even remotely true, but from some of the other left leaning comments in your post I suppose it shouldn't surprise me that you think it is. Business abhors strong government.Big Corporate lobbies for a stronger government.
I have thought that so many times, about so many people. And I thought it long before I actually lived overseas for a few years. Most people in this country don't have the slightest idea how good they've got it, and those idiot protesters don't have the slightest idea how bad what they're asking for, really would be.I think they should all be forced to live in another country for a year then come back and see what they really have right here in the USA.
The anger needs to be directed to the 535 people that are responsible for the laws that have created this mess. Class warfare is not going to solve anything, but that's the card the progressive liberals insist on playing. In my opinion any wealth you work hard to create for your self is yours to do with as you please. I don't care how much that is. All these winners going after corporations, why aren't they complaining about the millions that sports figures make or Hollywood. Our about the millions our elected representatives make. They don't attack our poor reps because they don't want to bite the hand that feeds them. Just my $0.02.
That post could be construed as a direct threat of gun violence against big corporations. It also screams socialism.
As a former corporate CEO an present investor I have no legal obligation to act in any manner other than for the proftability of the company, such actions being within the law. A corporation is not a person. It has no requirement to be sympathetic. As a private business owner I must do what is best for my future and that of my family. I'm not mommy and I don't accept complaints! If someone doesn't like me, my product or my methods they don't have to do business with me. But I'll not slave for decades just to hand over to those who cry in their milk. It's a tough world so many need to get off their rears, get an education an d stake their own claim in this world. For my money you can firehose the entire group of protestors in NYC. We've tolerated this for too long. If they have a gripe then they should take it to D.C where the problem originates.
I agree, but it still go's back to the 535. If they don't agree to a bail out they don't get the money. Private enterprise should never be bailed out by government. For the administration to state they are too big to fail is total BS. If the truth be known it's more like I need money. I help you and you return the favor. More hope and change I guess.Well, I can tell you why I'm mad at corporate America and not at Hollywood. If I pay ten bucks to see a movie, that's my choice. I didn't choose to bail out mega-corporations, and I sure didn't choose for them to give their CEOs huge bonuses with money they borrowed from me. And now that these businesses have paid back the bailout money, I would like my portion back, please.
Come back and see that they still have no job and not much hope of finding one?I think they should all be forced to live in another country for a year then come back and see what they really have right here in the USA.
That post could be construed as a direct threat of gun violence against big corporations. It also screams socialism.
As a former corporate CEO an present investor I have no legal obligation to act in any manner other than for the proftability of the company, such actions being within the law. A corporation is not a person. It has no requirement to be sympathetic.
As a private business owner I must do what is best for my future and that of my family. I'm not mommy and I don't accept complaints! If someone doesn't like me, my product or my methods they don't have to do business with me. But I'll not slave for decades just to hand over to those who cry in their milk.
Now if that loan is legal your beef isn't with me... it's with the government that loans that money. One characteristic of a good leader is that he will use every resource available to improve the bottom line. Improving the bottom line employs people. When I lose money people lose their jobs. It's pure economics. I can't emply people when constricted by society or regulations. I'm not in the charity business. The problem doesn't lie with every corporate CEO or business leader. The problem is rooted in the backwards polcies of both parties.I completely and totally agree, and with that being said, Mr. CEO, you had better not be taking loans from the government, i.e. ME, to pay your bills, and you had better not cry if your business goes under, 'cause the way the capitalism ball bounces.