ajr2820
New member
Not sure if he has a CCW, but here it is anyhow.
Drive-thru owner shoots robber | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com
Drive-thru owner shoots robber | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com
Ok, let me put my liberal hat on and drink some kool-aid. Did the store owner take into consideration the life these two thugs had lived? Why they were probably forced to a life of crime because he was a successful business man. He should have waited for the police after all we are told they are just seconds away and are better trained to deal with this situation. "Sarcastic icon goes here"So.... just wondering.... who is going to be the first to post how irresponsible the store owner's actions were and that he almost got his employee killed? And how dare the store owner act like a cop and hold the other robber at gunpoint! Any takers?
DISCLAIMER: I am posting that or stating that as my opinion....just wondering who the first one is going to be to post it.
You don't want to be a doormat to the dregs of society! !
So.... just wondering.... who is going to be the first to post how irresponsible the store owner's actions were and that he almost got his employee killed? And how dare the store owner act like a cop and hold the other robber at gunpoint! Any takers?
DISCLAIMER: I am posting that or stating that as my opinion....just wondering who the first one is going to be to post it.
"It is not an instance in which a self appointed wannabe Wyatt Earp was roaming the neighborhood looking for an opportunity to play batman."
This is an instance where the owner of the premises used his weapon to protect his employee and himself.
It is not an instance in which a self appointed wannabe Wyatt Earp was roaming the neighborhood looking for an opportunity to play batman.
There is a big difference between those two situations.
The people who don't understand the difference are the ones that worry me and most other sane people.
Anyone who wants to be a security guard on my premises can pick up and fill out an application.
So, in other words, let's put a customer with a gun in the back of the store instead of the boss, or a customer with a gun walks through the door and stumbles upon the same scene instead of the boss. Now all of a sudden the customer is Wyatt Earp if they take the same action?
The story states that the robber shot at the clerk before the owner took any action. That is entirely different from a customer-wannabe-security guard deciding to start a firefight because he or she has been dreaming about being an action hero.
Armed customers should protect themselves. What they shouldn't do is make security decisions for owner of the business.
OK so adding fuel to the fire. Robbery going down, Wyatt steps in to buy something. Sees the shooting and draws to engage. OUT steps the owner to confront said BG's but now has a third person armed in his store. How could this situation end?
Does Wyatt holster his weapon?
Does Wyatt blast the BG's AND this unknown assailant that just step out from the back blazing away?
What would you do if you were Wyatt? (No offense to anyone named Wyatt, I prefer Billy-Bob)
So.... just wondering.... who is going to be the first to post how irresponsible the store owner's actions were and that he almost got his employee killed? And how dare the store owner act like a cop and hold the other robber at gunpoint! Any takers?
DISCLAIMER: I am posting that or stating that as my opinion....just wondering who the first one is going to be to post it.