Obama's Czars

[Oldgrunt]

This email was sent to me with pictures of all these people. I don't know how to include pictures but just reading about them will give you an idea what we are up against








How many Czar's doe's it take to make a dictator?
KEEP OBAMA'S CZARS IN MIND WHEN NOVEMBER COMES. THEY ARE WORTHLESS TOOLS TO RUN OUR GOVERNMENT.�There are very few of us who know just what all of Obama's Czars do, as they quietly go about their "work" in the nation's capital. This listing of their names and job descriptions should be educational to all Americans, no matter what your political leaning. See who they are and realize what they want to do:�Richard Holbrooke - Afghanistan CzarUltra liberal anti-gun former Governor Of New Mexico. Pro-Abortion and pro- drug legalization. Wants to dissolve the 2nd Amendment

Ed Montgomery - Auto recovery CzarRadical anti-business black activist. Affirmative Action and Job Preference for blacks. University of Maryland Business School Dean; teaches that US business has caused world poverty. ACORN board member. Communist DuBois Club member.

Jeffrey Crowley - AIDS CzarRadical Homosexual. Gay Rights activist. Believes in Gay Marriage and a Special Status for homosexuals only, including complete free health care for gays.

Alan Bersin - Border CzarThe former failed superintendent of San Diego. Ultra-Liberal friend of Hillary Clinton. Served as Border Czar under Janet Reno - to keep borders open to illegals without interference from the Federal government.

David J. Hayes - California Water CzarSenior Fellow of radical environmentalist group "Progress Policy". No training or experience in water management whatsoever.

Ron Bloom - Car CzarAuto Union worker. Anti- business & anti- nuclear. Has worked hard to force US auto makers out of business. Sits on the Board of Chrysler which is now Union-owned. How did this happen?

Dennis Ross - Central Region CzarBelieves US policy is the cause of war in the Middle East. Obama apologist to the world. Anti-gun and completely Pro-Abortion.

Lynn Rosenthal - Domestic Violence CzarDirector of the National Network to End Domestic Violence. Vicious anti-male feminist. Supports male castration - imagine?

Gil Kerlikowske - Drug CzarDevoted lobbyist for every restrictive gun law proposal, former Chief of Police in liberal Seattle WA. Believes no American should own a firearm. Supports legalization of all drugs.

Paul Volcker - Economic CzarFormer head of the Federal Reserve under Jimmy Carter when US economy nearly failed. Obama-appointed head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board which engineered the Obama economic disaster to US economy. Member of anti-business "Progressive Policy" organization,

Carol Browner - Energy and Environment CzarPolitical Radical. Former head of the EPA - known for anti-business activism. Strong anti-gun ownership.

Joshua DuBois - Faith-Based CzarPolitical Black activist. Degree in Black Nationalism. Anti-gun ownership lobbyist.
WHAT THE HELL DOES A FAITH BASED CZAR DO ? ? ?

Cameron Davis - Great Lakes CzarChicago radical anti-business environmentalist. Blames George Bush for "Poisoning the water that minorities have to drink." No experience or training in water management whatsoever. Former ACORN Board member (what does that tell us?)

Van Jones - Green Jobs Czar(since resigned). Black activist with strong anti-white views. Member of American Communist Party and San Francisco Communist Party. Said George Bush caused the 9-11 attacks and wanted Bush investigated by the World Court for war crimes.

Daniel Fried - Guantanamo Closure CzarHuman Rights activist for Foreign Terrorists. Believes America has caused the Global War on Terrorism. Believes terrorists have rights above and beyond Americans.

Nancy-Ann DeParle - Health CzarFormer head of Medicare / Medicaid. Strong proponent of Healthcare Rationing (i.e. "Death Panels"). She is married to a reporter for The New York Times.

Vivek Kundra - Information CzarBorn in New Delhi, India. Controls all public information, including labels and news releases. Monitors all private Internet emails. (HELLO?)

Todd Stern - International Climate CzarAnti-business former White House Chief of Staff. Strong supporter of the Kyoto Accord; pushing hard for Cap and Trade. Blames US business for Global warming. Anti- US business prosperity.

Dennis Blair - Intelligence CzarRetired US Navy. Stopped US guided missile program he described as "provocative". Chair of ultra-Liberal "Council on Foreign Relations" which blames American organizations for regional wars.

George Mitchell - Mideast Peace CzarFmr. Sen from Maine Left wing radical. Has said Israel should be split up into "2 or 3 " smaller more manageable plots" (God forbid). A true Anti-nuclear anti-gun & pro homosexual "special rights" advocate.

Kenneth Feinberg - Pay CzarChief of Staff to Ted Kennedy. Lawyer who got rich off the 9-11 victims payoffs (horribly true).

Cass Sunstein - Regulatory CzarLiberal activist judge who believes free speech needs to be limited for the "common good"; essentially against the 1st Amendment. Has ruled against personal freedoms many times on private gun ownership and right to free speech cases. This guy has to be run out of Washington ! ! !

John Holdren - Science CzarFierce ideological environmentalist, Sierra Club anti-business activist. Claims US business has caused world poverty. No Science training.

Earl Devaney - Stimulus Accountability CzarSpent career trying to take guns away from American citizens. Believes in Open Borders to Mexico. Author of statement blaming US gun stores for drug war in Mexico .

J. Scott Gration - Sudan CzarNative of Democratic Republic of Congo . Believes US does little to help Third World countries. Council of foreign relations, asking for higher US taxes to support United Nations.

Herb Allison - TARP CzarFannie Mae CEO responsible for the US recession by using real estate mortgages to back up the US stock market. Caused millions of people to lose their life savings.

John Brennan - Terrorism CzarAnti CIA activist. No training in diplomatic or gov. affairs. Believes Open Borders to Mexico and a dialog with terrorists and has suggested Obama disband US military.. A TOTAL MORON!!!!!

Aneesh Chopra - Technology CzarNo Technology training. Worked for the Advisory Board Company, a health care think tank for hospitals. Anti-doctor activist. Supports Obama Healthcare Rationing (i.e. Death Panels) and salaried doctors working exclusively for the Government Healthcare plan.

Adolfo Carrion Jr. - Urban Affairs CzarPuerto Rico-born Anti-American activist and leftist group member in Latin America. Millionaire "slum lord" of Bronx, NY. Owns many lavish homes and condos which he got from "sweetheart" deals with labor unions. Wants higher taxes on middle class to pay for minority housing and healthcare.

Ashton Carter - Weapons CzarLeftist. Wants all private weapons in US destroyed. Supports UN ban on firearms ownership in America. No Other "policy".

Gary Samore - WMD Policy CzarFormer US Communist. Wants US to destroy all WMD unilaterally as a show of good faith. Has no other "policy"These are the people who are helping President Obama run our country.

THE 2012 ELECTION IS IMPORTANT BEYOND EXPLANATION.

 

[cmhbob]

Here's some original research for you. Took me about twenty minutes.

The list is crap, quite honestly.

For starters, in the United States, the informal political term "czar" or "tsar" is employed in media and popular usage to refer to high-level officials who oversee a particular policy. There have never been any U.S. government offices with the title "czar", but various governmental officials have sometimes been referred to by the nickname "czar" rather than their actual title.

The use of the term goes back to 1934, and FDR. Here's a list of presidents and the "czars" they appointed.

Richard Holbrooke doesn't do anything for anyone anymore. He died in 2010. He was previously special adviser on Pakistan and Afghanistan under Obama, but had also served various State Department positions under Clinton and Carter. Richard Holbrooke - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jeff Crowley is Director of the Office of National AIDS Policy. I don't see a problem with someone who has a Masters in Public Health heading up that office. And this being 2012, I really fail to see what anyone's sexual preference has to do with their ability to do a job. Jeffrey Crowley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

David J. Hayes is the Deputy Secretary of the Interior in the Obama administration. Hardly a "Czar." He was vice-chair of Link Removed. Nope, no water-management experience there. David J. Hayes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Link Removed is not a "radical environmentalist group."

Gil Kerlikowske was indeed the Seattle Police chief for a time. He opposed a 2003 ballot measure that downgraded marijuana possession priority. Pretty radical. In almost every public statement he's made since he took office, he is on record as opposing the legalization of drugs. BTW, the president who created the Office of National Drug Control Policy? That radical Ronald Reagan. The bill that created it was sponsored by...a Democrat.

 

[BluesStringer]

Oldgrunt, I do not mean to step on your toes in any way, but the Czars issue is something I have researched in-depth back when it was first coming to light, shortly after Obama took office. I have reams of information bookmarked, and have many posts of my own from different forums to draw from that should put a little "oompf" in your OP. I think it's an important issue, and thank you for bringing it up here.

While the list in the OP is outdated, the premise of quasi-official advisers to the President, many of whom are appointed through an internal process bypassing the confirmation process, is certainly something that every American should be deeply concerned about. And while we should, of course, try to hold our sources to high degrees of accuracy in reporting, the fact that the source in the OP missed a job in water management or the like, does not necessarily invalidate whatever criticisms of the individual's background that should cause concern for The People these individuals ostensibly serve.

If there is one valid criticism of Barack Hussein Obama, it's that he has surrounded himself with radicals, revolutionaries and deeply anti-American Marxists bent on destroying what little is left of the intended power and authority of the Constitution. And that's just since he's been an adult, which is logical when one considers what's known of his upbringing. His own books reveal these truisms. It's not something that agenda-driven opposition just conjured up and made widely known through some dirty-tricks rumor mill. His cadre of advisers, or Czars, or Politburo bureaucrats, whatever one wishes to call them, are nothing more than the extension of his own life-long choices of friends, co-workers and now, subordinates. Let's just look at three, with analysis significantly more in-depth than Oldgrunt's email offered.

The most current lists I can find still include these three Czars, but Obama, having never lived up to his "most transparent administration in history" promise, doesn't make it easy to find very "fresh" information. But these guys were working for our government as late as mid-2011 at least, and I'd seriously love to see someone defend their ideas as belonging anywhere within the sphere of influence of the President of the United States of America, even if they have left government since that time.

I will highlight the following three Czars in individual posts, Mark Lloyd, Cass Sunstein and Kevin Jennings, as I will take them from posts that I wrote three or so years ago on another forum, and there's no need to retype them again. I will do my best to make sure any source links are still active, but I can't guarantee all of them will be. Coming up, Mark Lloyd....

 

[BluesStringer]

1st Amendment apparently is meant to guarantee equal outcomes, not equal opportunity for communication.

Government, Lloyd said in his book, is the “only” institution that can manage the communications of the public, arguing that Washington must “ensure” that everyone has an equal ability to communicate.

The 1st Amendment is also apparently meant to be the means by which government is authorized to "manage" communication between people. That's odd. According to William O. Douglas:

t is anathema to the First Amendment to allow Government any role of censorship over newspapers, magazines, books, art, music, TV, radio, or any other aspect of the press. There is unhappiness in some circles at the impotence of Government. But if there is to be a change, let it come by constitutional amendment.

This says to me that the SCOTUS view is that Mark Lloyd has no legal authority whatsoever to "manage" communications of any kind, whether between individuals or individuals consuming corporate communications or corporate-to-corporate communications. That doesn't even get into the question of whether or not "Chief Diversity Officer of the FCC" is a constitutionally-authorized position for a President to create.

Lloyd goes on to say in his book, “Prologue to a Farce: Communications and Democracy in America” (University of Illinois Press):

“The American republic requires the active deliberation of a diverse citizenry, and this, I argue, can be ensured only by our government,” he says. “Put another way, providing for the equal capability of citizens to participate effectively in democratic deliberation is our collective responsibility.”

No Mr. Lloyd, the American Republic requires a governmental hands-off restriction to all matters of non-governmental communications. And anyone who wants to bring up the canard of "you're wrong because you can't yell fire in a crowded theater!" save it. Nothing I am talking about here is covered under any of the case law regarding the minuscule amount of restrictions placed on free speech or freedom of the press by the SCOTUS.

No surprise to me that Mark Lloyd's life and ideology is heavily influenced by Saul Alinsky and his slightly altered rewriting of The Communist Manifesto, "Rules For Radicals."

Lessons for Radicals

Lloyd relies heavily on the left-wing radical Saul Alinsky in explaining his strategy.

Alinsky (1909-1972) was a community organizer and activist from Chicago and the author of the book, Rules for Radicals, which opens with an acknowledgment "to the very first radical ... Lucifer." As for political tactics, Alinsky said, “The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away. In this book we are concerned with how to create mass organizations to seize power and give it to the people. This means revolution."

Alinsky was a master at obfuscating his intentions through verbal gymnastics and trickery. He claimed to be a revolutionary sticking up for the "Have-Nots," but the revolution he attempted to engineer is one that will only seize power from those with the least and consolidate it in the hands of those with the most; government. The Alinsky-Bot Mark Lloyd is now the Czar of the arm of government that is in the process of consolidating the power to control, regulate and even dismantle the most effective weapon against the seizing of our rights by government; the right to communicate freely and openly and without fear of retribution.

Not long ago I started a thread entitled, Link Removed in which I attempted to get y'all to recognize the threat of the reinstitution of The Fairness Doctrine as being certainly real, and in my opinion, imminent. As the posts came in suggesting that I was alarmed over nothing and quoting some official of the Obama campaign stating that he was not in favor of it, I remained alerted and alarmed. Mark Lloyd vindicates the reasonableness of my alarm. It is happening NOW! What kind of "diversity" is the "Chief Diversity Officer" going to impose as he goes about stifling the voices of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Hannity, maybe even MooreWatch (or USACarry.com)? Does anyone honestly believe that a self-confessed follower of Saul Alinsky is going to work hard at protecting the freedoms of conservative voices? Maybe this will help answer that question for any doubters out there. More From Lloyd's 2006 book:

It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press....This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies.

An unelected, unaccountable and perhaps unconstitutional official of our government just told you that the 1st Amendment is a distraction and exaggeration when compared to policies that might come out of an administration whose very authority to govern derives from the same document! WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!! You are witnessing the death throes of our nation!

Get to know your Czars.....

Next up, Cass Sunstein.....

 

[Oldgrunt]

Hey Bob: Thought this might get a rise out of you. First, let me say that Gil Kerlikowske is against drugs and I commend him for that. I do not, however, like his stand on disarming the entire populace. Can't go along with anyone professing such "crap,"as you put it. Since you profess to be a gunowner, I would hope you would dislike that stand also. I disagree with Jeffrey Crowley's stance on homosexuals and can not see them being given special status and free healthcare just for being homosexual. David Hayes' lack of experience in water management is of special interest to me since there has been talk of the UN taking over our water resources. The PPI is self explanatory. Other than that, I guess the list is right on. Sorry you don't like what I write or email I send on but heartburn can be cured with Alka-Seltzer, available in most grocery stores and pharmacies.

I don't mind you taking exception to anything I write. I find the repartee stimulating and, who knows, we may happen to agree on something down the line. Or....maybe not. Anyway, you have a good day and keep up the "original" research.

P.S.: Why does Obama need so many czars? Is he unable to do the job?

 

[Oldgrunt]

Blues: Thanks for the post. Don't mind my toes, keep on keeping on!

 

[BluesStringer]

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Link Removed, Director, White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Betcha never heard of that official government entity before, didjya?

The first of these czars is Link Removed, who is heading the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Afairs. He believes that the First Amendment’s free-speech protections need to be revamped in favor of more government regulation. This is right in keeping with the Obama administration’s attempts to marginalize the anti-tax Tea Parties that have sprouted up around the country. Indeed, Sunstein believes that “without taxes there would be no liberty.” I guess our Founding Fathers were just plain wrong when they started a whole revolution over taxes and the right to protest them freely.

From the link in the above quoted text:

In his 2004 book The Second Bill of Rights: FDR’s Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More than Ever, Sunstein Link Removed* that citizens’ rights exist only to the extent that they are granted by the government.

I would bet that even our resident New Zealanders, Brits, Canadians and maybe even Austrians could point out the absurd fallacy of that statement. But there's more....

Sunstein, who Link Removed that the federal courts are dominated by conservatives, agrees with Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s assertion that the Constitution is a “living” document whose meanings and mandates change with the passage of time. Arguing against the doctrine of original intent, he supports Breyer’s contention that Justices should be less concerned with the clear and intended meaning of the words and phrases which the Framers wrote into the Constitution, than with determining how best to apply the Constitution’s supposed underlying principle, or Big Picture. In Breyer’s view (which Sunstein shares), this underlying principle was the Framers’ wish to grant future generations of Americans -- through the Supreme Court -- a measure of “active liberty,” or “the freedom to participate in government itself.” By this mechanism, Justices are, for all practical purposes, free to read whatever meanings they wish into the actual words of the Constitution.

Characterizing the Constitution as an outdated document whose 18th century perspective cannot adequately address 21st century problems, Breyer has Link Removed “The people who wrote the Constitution really didn’t think there would be an Internet. They thought the commerce clause would apply in the future but just to horses. They didn’t dream of automobiles; they didn’t dream of television; they didn’t dream of Internet, computers, all the things that affect our privacy, for example.” This is essentially the view of Cass Sunstein as well.

From the Link Removed commenting on what Breyer said:

This ignores two things.

1) Technology changes; human nature does not. We are influenced by same passions that shaped human action two centuries or two millennia years ago. (Unable to comprehend this, since the French Revolution, the left has been trying to remake human nature – with disastrous results.)

The Founding Fathers understood the yearning for freedom and the need to balance this with the quest for order and community. Having just escaped the British monarchy, they knew of the dangers of government. (Washington wrote: "Government is like fire -- at best an uncertain servant; at worst a fearful master.") The reason for the separation of powers and checks and balances was to assure that no branch of the federal government ever dominates the other two. That system still works well -- even in the age of the Internet – or would if the courts let it.

2) Clearly, the Founding Fathers understood that from time to time their great work would require alteration. They provided for this in the amendment process, set forth in Article V.

At the same time, they didn’t want to see our national charter changed without serious deliberation and absent a national consensus. The mechanism they created requires both. Amendments are "proposed" by a two-thirds vote of each house of Congress. Then the amendment must be ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states.

Because the process is deliberately cumbersome and requires super-majorities all around, despite hundreds of attempts, the Constitution has only been amended 27 times over two centuries – the last in 1992.

Breyer and his colleagues ignore Article V because they know they could never achieve their goals in this way. Imagine that, 20 years ago, someone in the Democratic Party had suggested: "In the name of fairness and inclusion, let’s amend the Constitution to provide for racial quotas!" Such a proposal would have gotten, two dozen votes in Congress, and been greeted in the hinterlands with the proverbial Bronx Cheer. It could only have been accomplished by judicial fiat.

OK, if you want to know more about Sunstein's radical views on the Constitution, just follow those links and educate yourselves. But don't think that because I put his constitutional views up front that those radical views are the biggest threat to liberty that Sunstein's unelected, unaccountable and unconstitutional position represents. Here's the REAL and BIGGEST threat via his ultra left-wing fringe thinking.....

Continued....

 

[BluesStringer]

....Continued:

(Note: Found a couple or three dead links in the following that I couldn't find current mirrors for. Take the missing allusions with however many grains of salt you wish - there's plenty of sourced material to consider anyway.)

The Secret Animal Rights Agenda Of America’s Next Regulatory Czar

Barack Obama’s pick for “regulatory czar,” Harvard Law School Professor Cass Sunstein, may be the incoming president’s most popular appointment so far. Judging from his resume -- best-selling author, “pre-eminent legal scholar of our time,” and an endorsement from The Wall Street Journal -- we can almost understand why. Almost. Because as we’re telling the media today, there’s one troubling portion of the new Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) Administrator’s C.V. that has seems to have flown under everyone’s radar: Link Removed

Don’t believe us? Sunstein has made no secret of his devotion to the cause of establishing legal “rights” for livestock, wildlife, and pets. “[T]here should be extensive regulation of the use of animals in entertainment, scientific experiments, and agriculture,” Sunstein wrote in a 2002 working paper while at the University of Chicago Law school.

“Extensive regulation of the use of animals.” That's PETA-speak for using government to get everything PETA and the Humane Society of the United States can't get through gentle pressure or Link Removed. Not exactly the kind of thing American ranchers, restaurateurs, hunters, and biomedical researchers (to say nothing of ordinary consumers) would like to hear from their next “regulatory czar.”

A version of the same paper also appeared as the introduction to Link Removed, a 2004 book that Sunstein co-edited with then-girlfriend Martha Nussbaum. In that book, Sunstein set out an ambitious plan to give animals the legal “right” to file lawsuits. We're not joking:

“[A]nimals should be permitted to bring suit, with human beings as their representatives, to prevent violations of current law … Any animals that are entitled to bring suit would be represented by (human) counsel, who would owe guardian like obligations and make decisions, subject to those obligations, on their clients’ behalf.”

It doesn't end there. Sunstein delivered a keynote speech at Harvard University’s 2007 “Facing Animals” conference. (Link Removed; his speech starts around 39:00.) Keep in mind that as OIRA Administrator, Sunstein will have the political authority to implement a massive federal government overhaul. Consider this tidbit:

“We ought to ban hunting, I suggest, if there isn’t a purpose other than sport and fun. That should be against the law. It’s time now.”

Sunstein also argued in favor of “eliminating current practices such as greyhound racing, cosmetic testing, and meat eating, most controversially.”

He concluded his Harvard speech by expressing his “more ambitious animating concern” that the current treatment of livestock and other animals should be considered “a form of unconscionable barbarity not the same as, but in many ways morally akin to, slavery and mass extermination of human beings.” Sound familiar?

As the individual about to assume Sunstein owes the public an honest appraisal of his animal rights goals before taking office. Will the next four years be a dream-come-true for anti-meat, anti-hunting, and anti-everything-else radicals? Time will tell. For now, meat lovers might want to stock their freezers.

Get to know your Czars people....

Next up, Kevin Jennings - Safe Schools Czar - Appointed, no confirmation....

 

[BluesStringer]

This new Czar system is just plain fun, ain't it though? What do we have for your reading pleasure today? Have you heard of Kevin Jennings before? Oh, he's a real great guy. A real great gay guy, who used to be a high school teacher, and who refused to disclose to the school's administration or the cops when a 15 year old male student disclosed to him that he had had sex with an older man the night before. Isn't that special?

Oh, did I mention what Czar-ship Mr. Jennings currently holds? Well silly, he's the Safe Schools Czar! I mean, who among you will admit that you couldn't figure that one out just from the previous paragraph? HA! We don't have idiots here at MooreWatch (or at USACarry.com), so I knew I probably wouldn't need to make it clear up front that the Safe Schools Czar kept the secret of a 15-year-old that he had been statutorily raped by a gay pervert in a public bathroom just the night before!

I know it's boring and predictable, and certainly insignificant in our anything-goes culture, but here's the story if'n you're interested anyhow:

Sweetness & Light
At the president’s pleasure
Monday, September 28, 2009

A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an "older man." At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama’s "safe school czar."

It’s getting hard to keep track of all of this president’s problematic appointments. Clearly, the process for vetting White House employees has broken down.

In this one case in which Mr. Jennings had a real chance to protect a young boy from a sexual predator, he not only failed to do what the law required but actually encouraged the relationship.

According to Mr. Jennings’ own description in a new audiotape discovered by Fox News, the 15-year-old boy met the "older man" in a "bus station bathroom" and was taken to the older man’s home that night. When some details about the case became public, Mr. Jennings threatened to sue another teacher who called his failure to report the statutory rape "unethical." Mr. Jennings’ defenders asserted that there was no evidence that he was aware the student had sex with the older man.

However, the new audiotape contradicts this claim. In 2000, Mr. Jennings gave a talk to the Iowa chapter of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, an advocacy group that promotes homosexuality in schools. On the tape, Mr. Jennings recollected that he told the student to make sure "to use a condom" when he was with the older man. That he actively encouraged the relationship is reinforced by Mr. Jennings’ own description in his 1994 book, "One Teacher in 10." In that account, the teacher boasts how he allayed the student’s concerns about the relationship to such a degree that the 15-year-old "left my office with a smile on his face that I would see every time I saw him on the campus for the next two years, until he graduated."

Mr. Jennings’ denials about these events reveal a lack of remorse. He has not admitted that he made mistakes in this case, and he now refuses to answer any questions about the scandal. Don’t forget, this is a presidential appointee we’re talking about. Mr. Obama should make clear what his standards are for public servants serving at the pleasure of the president. Encouraging and covering up man-boy sexual activity are serious offenses. The White House should force Mr. Jennings to come clean.

Mr. Jennings has made extremely radical statements promoting homosexuality in schools and about his utter contempt for religion that render him unsuitable for a prestigious White House appointment. His job in the Obama administration is to ensure student safety, and this scandal directly calls into question his ability to perform that job. Mr. Jennings and Obama administration officials refuse to answer any questions about this newly discovered evidence. A lot of Americans want answers about this guy and how he was approved for a job in the White House.

Of course the real scandal here is that Mr. Jennings was ever appointed Mr. Obama’s ‘Safe School Czar’ in the first place.

Here is the above-referenced recording of Jennings bragging and joking to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network about the incident for all the doubters out there.

Isn't this just the greatest country on Earth, that a radical gay activist who brags to other gay activists that he once watched out for a young boy's safety by telling him to use a condom when he....well....you can figure it out for yourself...., that anti-statutory-rape-laws gay activist is now watching out for the safety of all kids in America right this minute?!?!?! Only in America. And just think! We can have this kind of paternal government involvement in our health care decisions too! Ain't it exciting?

Blues

**Note: The audio link above is still good. You really need to listen to it to get a feel for the kind of sick, twisted miscreants Obama believes are deserving of the public trust. Link Removed

Blues

 

[BluesStringer]

OK, I found a follow-up post to the one above that highlights the depravity of Kevin Jennings 100 times worse than anything I already mentioned. I had (purposely, I think) forgotten all about this. The audio links are all still good. Not positive about all the rest of them, but at least some are. Here ya go....

_________________________________

More wonderful, inspirational news about our Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings. Unfortunately, a lot more.

Did I mention before that Jennings was a big fan of Link Removed? Ah yes, good ol' Harry Hay, founder of NAMBLA. Link Removed You know, the same kind of sex that Jennings covered up when one of his 15 year old students disclosed to him that he was engaging in it without a condom because, the troubled kid said, his life wasn't worth living anyway. Even that didn't prompt our fine, upstanding Safe Schools Czar to report to anyone in authority what the kid was involved in. But I digress....

Jennings isn't simply a teacher who happens to be gay, he's a gay activist who openly promotes homosexuality to school kids because he just happens to be a teacher. Not only does he promote homosexuality, but he promoted Harry Hay's NAMBLA kind of homosexuality, as in Man/Boy. At a conference of the organization that he founded, the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), in Oct. of '97, Jennings said among other things:

One of the people that’s always inspired me is Harry Hay, who started the first ongoing gay rights groups in America. In 1948, he tried to get people to join the Mattachine Society [the first American homosexual “rights” group]. It took him two years to find one other person who would join. Well, [in] 1993, Harry Hay marched with a million people in Washington, who thought he had a good idea 40 years before. Everybody thought Harry Hay was crazy in 1948, and they knew something about him which he apparently did not—they were right, he was crazy. You are all crazy. We are all crazy. All of us who are thinking this way are crazy, because you know what? Sane people keep the world the same [sh*tty] old way it is now. It’s the people who think, ‘No, I can envision a day when straight people say, ‘So what if you’re promoting homosexuality?’

To this cretin, Harry Hay promoting man/boy rape is no different or less worthy of being inspired by than his own self-admitted cause of promoting homosexuality to school children. Jennings also edited a book called Becoming Visible: A Reader in Gay and Lesbian History for High School and College Students which included a biographical sketch on Harry Hay. One of GLSEN’s Education Department resources also lists a Link Removed

Are we getting a Chris Matthews-style tingle up our collective leg yet over the thought of this guy being in charge of our "Safe Schools" programs?

But there's more...

Jennings writes the Forward to a book called, "Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling" by William J. Letts IV and James T. Sears. Now, ya gotta admit, that title is a real grabber, especially the part about elementary education. Anyway, Jennings wrote the Forward to the book. And in the Mother of All Coincidences, who should appear on the back cover lending his endorsement of this wonderful piece of literary sweetness and light? Bill Ayers! So the terrorist of the Pentagon joins the Safe School Czar in promoting homosexuality to elementary school-aged children! Cool, huh? It's funny how Bill Ayers keeps showing up in the Obama extended-family-sphere, but he was just a casual acquaintance of Obama's, right? With all of these kinds of activist, terrorist, gay-agenda-promoting education "professionals" leading the Obama agenda on education, can we expect the Bush program, "No Child Left Behind" to be repackaged and renamed to "No Child's Behind Left Alone?" Link Removed

Anyway, I digress again, but unfortunately, there is yet more....

One might expect the Safe Schools Czar would be all about keeping schools safe for all kids, right? What if some of those kids are Christians? Well, that's kind of a dumb question, now isn't it? I mean, what is it, like 80% or more identify as Christian in this country, so it stands to reason that a significant number of school kids would too. Well, here's what Safe School Czar Kevin Jennings has to say about Christians; "...F 'em!" And, "Drop dead!" Before coming to actively promote his gay agenda as the Safe Schools Czar, Jennings used to be a regular contributor at the Huffington Post. In this gigantic jewel of colossal hypocrisy, he excoriates a new Texas law that simply mandates the opportunity for religious speech to be available at school functions to speakers. In other words, the law would make it safe for Valedictorians to praise God for their accomplishments or whatever, without being stifled by anti-religious zealots like Jennings. As you can see, the same guy that admittedly actively promotes homosexuality to elementary school children got pretty pissed off that Christians would be allowed by law to simply say, "Thank you God" for whatever.

Now the creme de la creme of actively promoting the gay agenda in schools. You gotta have a strong stomach for this one, so stop reading now if you're at all squeamish.

What would come to mind if you heard the word, "Fistgate?" Before I started reading up on this perverted miscreant, I might've thought that "Fistgate" would refer to the revenue generated at a UFC fight-night or something like that. But I'd be wrong. Fistgate earned its dubious name when GLSEN, you know, the group that Jennings founded, sponsored, along with the State of Massachusetts, a "Workshop" for one of GLSEN's "GSAs" (Gay/Straight Alliance) clubs in 2000 during which the practice of sexual act of "fisting" was not only discussed, but instructed on how to do the "right way." Don't take my word for it. Listen to Part 1 and then Part 2 for yourself. Besides "fisting" instruction, students as young as 12 friggin' years old were also schooled on the "proper etiquette" of whether or not to spit or swallow upon a "happy ending" of oral sex. "Happy ending" is my description, not a quote from the tape. Their language was even less clinical than that. Pure street-level, gutter-snipe slang is what you will hear on the recording.

So there ya go. There's your Safe Schools Czar who actively promotes homosexuality, extreme sex acts to 12 year olds, is inspired by the #1 most well-known child molester in the history of the friggin world, all the while under the guise of promoting simple and innocuous tolerance for homosexuality as he issues screed after screed of vulgar intolerance for religious folk.

Get to know your Czars people. As you get to know them, get to know your President by judging him on the people he surrounds himself with, just like he told us to do in a debate with McCain during the campaign. These people are utterly dangerous.

Blues

 

[CharlieK]

Here's some original research for you. Took me about twenty minutes.

The list is crap, quite honestly.

For starters, in the United States, the informal political term "czar" or "tsar" is employed in media and popular usage to refer to high-level officials who oversee a particular policy. There have never been any U.S. government offices with the title "czar", but various governmental officials have sometimes been referred to by the nickname "czar" rather than their actual title.

The use of the term goes back to 1934, and FDR. Here's a list of presidents and the "czars" they appointed.

Richard Holbrooke doesn't do anything for anyone anymore. He died in 2010. He was previously special adviser on Pakistan and Afghanistan under Obama, but had also served various State Department positions under Clinton and Carter. Richard Holbrooke - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.....

Also, Richard Holbrooke was never governor of New Mexico, as stated by Oldgrunt

 

[BluesStringer]

Here's some original research for you. Took me about twenty minutes.

The list is crap, quite honestly.

For starters, in the United States, the informal political term "czar" or "tsar" is employed in media and popular usage to refer to high-level officials who oversee a particular policy. There have never been any U.S. government offices with the title "czar", but various governmental officials have sometimes been referred to by the nickname "czar" rather than their actual title.

The use of the term goes back to 1934, and FDR. Here's a list of presidents and the "czars" they appointed.

Richard Holbrooke doesn't do anything for anyone anymore. He died in 2010. He was previously special adviser on Pakistan and Afghanistan under Obama, but had also served various State Department positions under Clinton and Carter. Richard Holbrooke - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jeff Crowley is Director of the Office of National AIDS Policy. I don't see a problem with someone who has a Masters in Public Health heading up that office. And this being 2012, I really fail to see what anyone's sexual preference has to do with their ability to do a job. Jeffrey Crowley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

David J. Hayes is the Deputy Secretary of the Interior in the Obama administration. Hardly a "Czar." He was vice-chair of Link Removed. Nope, no water-management experience there. David J. Hayes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Link Removed is not a "radical environmentalist group."

Gil Kerlikowske was indeed the Seattle Police chief for a time. He opposed a 2003 ballot measure that downgraded marijuana possession priority. Pretty radical. In almost every public statement he's made since he took office, he is on record as opposing the legalization of drugs. BTW, the president who created the Office of National Drug Control Policy? That radical Ronald Reagan. The bill that created it was sponsored by...a Democrat.

Also, Richard Holbrooke was never governor of New Mexico, as stated by Oldgrunt

Wow. Glad you focused like a laser beam on the really important information in this thread. Link Removed

Why would anyone waste a word or give a second thought to an official of the US government who is tasked with keeping schools "safe" in this country being an active promoter of the sex act known as "fisting" to pre-teen school children? Man, the board has been saved from being exposed to an erroneous factoid about a dead Czar though! Thanks Charlie!
Link Removed

And cmhbob, I didn't notice before, but upon reviewing your links, I find it rather intellectually lazy and dishonest of you to state that "the list is crap," and then follow that statement with a cut-and-paste job that you didn't attribute to its source, and actively tried to pass off as your own by adding the words, "For starters..." in front of it. And you even claim it's "original research!" Perhaps just an honest oversight on your part, but bad form in any case.

How on Earth anyone can defend or ignore the czars in any administration in general, but the gaggle of miscreants, perverts and self-avowed Marxists in this administration specifically, is beyond me. So Oldgrunt's email wasn't quite perfectly accurate. So what really? Were the parts that are accurate any less troubling because of the presence of inaccuracies in it? Did I get anything wrong? And if you claim I did, is it anything relative to what makes the three czars that I highlighted completely irresponsible of Obama to put anywhere near the seats of power in this country?

And now Obama has bypassed the confirmation process again by recess appointing Richard Cordray to head up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau when the Senate wasn't even in recess. More Czartastic maneuvering from the Marxist In Chief, eh?

Blues

 

[cmhbob]

And cmhbob, I didn't notice before, but upon reviewing your links, I find it rather intellectually lazy and dishonest of you to state that "the list is crap," and then follow that statement with a cut-and-paste job that you didn't attribute to its source, and actively tried to pass off as your own by adding the words, "For starters..." in front of it. And you even claim it's "original research!"

Holy crap! Someone actually read the links I posted!

 

[BluesStringer]

Holy crap! Someone actually read the links I posted!

If that's all you've got, why did you even post in this thread? Obviously not for accuracy's sake, as you make a joke about plagiarizing another author's words. That's amazing. Disgustingly amazing.

Blues

 

[CharlieK]

Wow. Glad you focused like a laser beam on the really important information in this thread. Link Removed

Why would anyone waste a word or give a second thought to an official of the US government who is tasked with keeping schools "safe" in this country being an active promoter of the sex act known as "fisting" to pre-teen school children? Man, the board has been saved from being exposed to an erroneous factoid about a dead Czar though! Thanks Charlie!
Link Removed.
.
.
.
Blues

Blues,
Thank you for your insightful and inciteful comment. I trust that it felt really good when you pulled it out of your ass. What did I say that had anything to do with sexual perverts?

 

[BluesStringer]

Blues,
Thank you for your insightful and inciteful comment. I trust that it felt really good when you pulled it out of your ass. What did I say that had anything to do with sexual perverts?

That's just it, you said nothing about the pervert highlighted in the post just above yours, Kevin Jennings. "Why would anyone waste a word or give a second thought to" such a pervert, who is, and has been for about 3 years now, a chief adviser to Obama on "safe schools." It struck me as avoidance towards the important issues in the thread so that you could just take a really trivial dig at Oldgrunt for a meaningless inaccuracy in his OP. You ignored the sexual pervert issue in favor of being petty, that's what I meant, and I pulled it out of your post, not out of my ass.

Blues

 

[CharlieK]

That's just it, you said nothing about the pervert highlighted in the post just above yours, Kevin Jennings. "Why would anyone waste a word or give a second thought to" such a pervert, who is, and has been for about 3 years now, a chief adviser to Obama on "safe schools." It struck me as avoidance towards the important issues in the thread so that you could just take a really trivial dig at Oldgrunt for a meaningless inaccuracy in his OP. You ignored the sexual pervert issue in favor of being petty, that's what I meant, and I pulled it out of your post, not out of my ass.

Blues

Oh, I'm soooo sooorrry that I didn't comment on what you wanted me to comment on. I guess I was mistaken in thinking that I was making MY post, not YOURS. My mistake, and it won't happen again.

For your information, my philosophy (and I do have a doctor of philosophy degree) is that when I see someone's writing and notice something so very blatantly and obviously wrong, I tend not to read anything else in that writing; so I didn't.

pilii .... iiliq

 

[BluesStringer]

Oh, I'm soooo sooorrry that I didn't comment on what you wanted me to comment on. I guess I was mistaken in thinking that I was making MY post, not YOURS. My mistake, and it won't happen again.

For your information, my philosophy (and I do have a doctor of philosophy degree) is that when I see someone's writing and notice something so very blatantly and obviously wrong, I tend not to read anything else in that writing; so I didn't.

pilii .... iiliq

Something I said about the Czars was wrong, or about your post(s)? If it was about the Czars, please do enlighten us. If it was about your post, I don't see how saying that it "struck" me a certain way could conceivably be "so very blatantly and obviously wrong." I purposely left an opening for you to correct my impression if warranted. Apparently your doctorate justifies you getting pissy rather than explaining what you consider to be wrong with something I said. Kind of weird on a "discussion" forum though, whether one has a doctorate or is a high school drop-out. Oh well, piss on if you prefer....

Blues

 

[CharlieK]

Something I said about the Czars was wrong, or about your post(s)? If it was about the Czars, please do enlighten us. If it was about your post, I don't see how saying that it "struck" me a certain way could conceivably be "so very blatantly and obviously wrong." I purposely left an opening for you to correct my impression if warranted. Apparently your doctorate justifies you getting pissy rather than explaining what you consider to be wrong with something I said. Kind of weird on a "discussion" forum though, whether one has a doctorate or is a high school drop-out. Oh well, piss on if you prefer....

Blues

pilii .... iiliq