~Obama Voter Versus Cow....Cow Wins~

[The_Outlaw]

A registered Democrat and ardent Obama supporter was testing out his new camera recently by, for some reason, filming the body of a dead cow, when he was chased around a pasture and over a fence by an irritated group of related bovines.
“Sup bro?” YouTube user “nathan bverbeez” (Registered Democrat) nervously asks one of advancing bovines at the beginning of the clip, adding: “Watcha doin’ bro?” in a wussified voice.
After the animals appear to calm, the liberal democrat makes the near-fatal mistake of taunting the creatures more.
“Raah!” the liberal cameraman shouts. “Got a problem? Come at me!”
The conservative animals oblige, chasing the cursing and cowardly liberal cameraman and his fellow Democrat companion past some trees and across a fence in a weak impersonation of the running of the bulls.
After the two wussified and very frightened liberals finally cross the fence to safety, the conservative cows gather to stare down the scared liberal human offenders from the other side of the fence.

Link Removed

 

[jhodge83]

Stupidity knows no political affiliation, as shown by the journalistic "flare" added from the actual article.

 

[The_Outlaw]

Stupidity knows no political affiliation, as shown by the journalistic "flare" added from the actual article.

Awwww....C'mon Hodgey....Why the long face??
Anyone with a brain can clearly see that those two bozos in the video clip are registered Democrats.
LMAO! :jester:

 

[jhodge83]

It's bad enough to look at the new posts here and constantly see copy/paste news. Made worse when people can't let the news "facts" speak for themselves. No better than the MSM outlets and their opinion based news.

 

[The_Outlaw]

It's bad enough to look at the new posts here and constantly see copy/paste news. Made worse when people can't let the news "facts" speak for themselves. No better than the MSM outlets and their opinion based news.

Not quite as 'bad' as having to wake up everyday and see what 'your' President (Obummer) and 'your' beloved Democrats (DumboCrappers) are slowly but surely doing to this once great country.

P.s.
Nobody is forcing you to read any of my posts 'Hodgey'.

Stop your whining and have a cookie.

 

[jhodge83]

Not quite as 'bad' as having to wake up everyday and see what 'your' President (Obummer) and 'your' beloved Democrats (DumboCrappers) are slowly but surely doing to this once great country.

P.s.
Nobody is forcing you to read any of my posts 'Hodgey'.

Stop your whining and have a cookie.

Again, what from my posts in this thread point to who or what I vote for? Just because I don't agree with flooding facts with opinionated interjections means I've voted a certain way? Anytime anyone on this forum simply disagrees with a person, they're labeled a troll or "libtard". I'd say you are assuming, but we all know that adage and I'm not going to inject myself into that mix. This furthers the basis for my posts in here being about news facts and not opinion based attention grabbers. If you are simple enough to not be able to take the actual news and understand what is going on, you add fillers.

Without the complete bias, the article and material showing the stupid things some people do is actually funny.

 

[The_Outlaw]

Again, what from my posts in this thread point to who or what I vote for? Just because I don't agree with flooding facts with opinionated interjections means I've voted a certain way? Anytime anyone on this forum simply disagrees with a person, they're labeled a troll or "libtard". I'd say you are assuming, but we all know that adage and I'm not going to inject myself into that mix. This furthers the basis for my posts in here being about news facts and not opinion based attention grabbers. If you are simple enough to not be able to take the actual news and understand what is going on, you add fillers.

Without the complete bias, the article and material showing the stupid things some people do is actually funny.

Yes, right on Hodgey...Because we all know that 'you' have never shown any bias within any of your previous posts.

 

[jhodge83]

Yes, right on Hodgey...Because we all know that 'you' have never shown any bias within any of your previous posts.

By saying that I voted for Paul in the SC primary and was disappointed when we voted up Newt? By saying that I lean to different sides depending on the actual issue at hand and not boxing everything out by going party line?


Then sure...

 

[tcox4freedom]

May NSFW because of a few "F" bombs. But, hilarious.

 

[The_Outlaw]

By saying that I voted for Paul in the SC primary and was disappointed when we voted up Newt? By saying that I lean to different sides depending on the actual issue at hand and not boxing everything out by going party line?

Then sure...

Hodgey, Imvho, you are a Kool Aid drinking LibTard...
Here is just one sample of your very own words on this forum Defending ObamaLamaDingDong's stance on more gun control dated July 26th 2012 (Notice how you even like to refer to Fox News as "Faux News"). ;

"I'm not at all surprised that FAUX news left out some of the rest of his speech...
In his broadest remarks on gun control yet in the aftermath of the mass shooting at a Colorado movie theater, President Barack Obama called late Wednesday for tougher background checks designed to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill.
"A lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals -- that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities," the president, who has called for reimposing the Assault Weapons Ban, said in a speech to the National Urban League."I believe the majority of gun owners would agree that we should do everything possible to prevent criminals and fugitives from purchasing weapons; that we should check someone's criminal record before they can check out a gun seller; that a mentally unbalanced individual should not be able to get his hands on a gun so easily," he said. "These steps shouldn't be controversial. They should be common sense."
But Obama also offered a nod to the difficult politics of gun control, portraying himself as a believer in the individual right to bear arms, and acknowledging that calls to action after an incident like the one in Aurora often fade.
"When there is an extraordinarily heartbreaking tragedy like the one we saw, there's always an outcry immediately after for action. And there's talk of new reforms, and there's talk of new legislation," Obama said in his speech. "And too often, those efforts are defeated by politics and by lobbying and eventually by the pull of our collective attention elsewhere."
"And I, like most Americans, believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual the right to bear arms. And we recognize the traditions of gun ownership that passed on from generation to generation -— that hunting and shooting are part of a cherished national heritage," he said.
Obama urges tighter background checks on gun buyers after Aurora massacre | The Ticket - Yahoo! News
"he's (Obama's) promoting tougher background checks and nothing more. also promotes the 2nd ammendment. crazy talk about "what if's" is what's driving up the prices and demand on things for no reason". " -jhodge83-

 

[jhodge83]

Hodgey, Imvho, you are a Kool Aid drinking LibTard...
Here is just one sample of your very own words on this forum Defending ObamaLamaDingDong's stance on more gun control dated July 26th 2012 (Notice how you even like to refer to Fox News as "Faux News"). ;

"I'm not at all surprised that FAUX news left out some of the rest of his speech...
In his broadest remarks on gun control yet in the aftermath of the mass shooting at a Colorado movie theater, President Barack Obama called late Wednesday for tougher background checks designed to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill.
"A lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals -- that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities," the president, who has called for reimposing the Assault Weapons Ban, said in a speech to the National Urban League."I believe the majority of gun owners would agree that we should do everything possible to prevent criminals and fugitives from purchasing weapons; that we should check someone's criminal record before they can check out a gun seller; that a mentally unbalanced individual should not be able to get his hands on a gun so easily," he said. "These steps shouldn't be controversial. They should be common sense."
But Obama also offered a nod to the difficult politics of gun control, portraying himself as a believer in the individual right to bear arms, and acknowledging that calls to action after an incident like the one in Aurora often fade.
"When there is an extraordinarily heartbreaking tragedy like the one we saw, there's always an outcry immediately after for action. And there's talk of new reforms, and there's talk of new legislation," Obama said in his speech. "And too often, those efforts are defeated by politics and by lobbying and eventually by the pull of our collective attention elsewhere."
"And I, like most Americans, believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual the right to bear arms. And we recognize the traditions of gun ownership that passed on from generation to generation -— that hunting and shooting are part of a cherished national heritage," he said.
Obama urges tighter background checks on gun buyers after Aurora massacre | The Ticket - Yahoo! News
"he's (Obama's) promoting tougher background checks and nothing more. also promotes the 2nd ammendment. crazy talk about "what if's" is what's driving up the prices and demand on things for no reason". " -jhodge83-

Yes. Faux news panders to everything right and Communist News Network, etc panders to everything left...that's not new news to anyone.

My comments were in direct response which post the full content of what was spoken, not what was once again pieced of what was being said. You keep furthering my point about sticking to facts. You also decided not to highlight the rest of what was said that was conveniently left out initially.

We all know that bans will not take effect. No support for them and no one will sign off. We've seen legislation get proposed and dropped from lack of support, rightly so.

I guess after all it was my opinion that all of the crazy talk would drive up prices? Wait... Now I can't even get some paper cutters from my LGS thanks to the panic. Had to hound the web in order to get some 325 boxes of .22LR and cant find anything locally or decently priced for my other calibers.


what about...

I agree as well that both sides have screwed the pooch for the way things are today.

or

Yup yup. I agree left on some issues and right on the others, but neither party can claim no fault as to our current situation.

or

have you seen me post that Obama is the messiah, the best president ever, the end all be all savior of this country? hell no. no one is and no one will be. if my candidate that i voted for in the SC republican primary received the ticket, i'd be voting for him next month. didnt happen since apparently my state would have rather seen an obnoxious, philandering liar...

or

No, I'm quite sure he has no idea about any of the specifics of his plan.

Link Removed

They were both speaking out of their asses...nothing new to politics!

Need I keep going? I don't pigeonhole myself into one train of thought w/ everything else being wrong. Everything isn't black/white.

 

[UATKP]

Awwww....C'mon Hodgey....Why the long face??
Anyone with a brain can clearly see that those two bozos in the video clip are registered Democrats.
LMAO! :jester:

Never saw a conservative run from a little heifer calf like that one before, so I'm sure it was an Obama voter. )

 

[The_Outlaw]

Never saw a conservative run from a little heifer calf like that one before, so I'm sure it was an Obama voter. )

You and I both agree.....But Hodgey disagrees it seems.

 

[The_Outlaw]

Hodgey, I could waste more of my time and dig up even more of your past biased liberal views if I really wanted to, but what would be the point?
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck imho.
Have a nice day, and try not to get too 'punch drunk' on all of that liberal 'Kool Aid'.

 

[jhodge83]

Hodgey, I could waste more of my time and dig up even more of your past biased liberal views if I really wanted to, but what would be the point?
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck imho.
Have a nice day, and try not to get too 'punch drunk' on all of that liberal 'Kool Aid'.

If you think one party has the correct answer on everything, you are drinking the kool aid. Not one person and surely not one party has the correct answers. If they did, there would not be the number of parties that dont get the MSM attention or the division within the main parties.

This sheltered thinking is what keeps things from being fixed by a compromise by all involved and causing the stalemates we have now. Let everyone continue to stick to their guns and see how far that gets us.