Obama Admin Aims Keyboard Commandos at Gun Control

gejoslin

Illegitimi non carborundu
Obama Admin Aims Keyboard Commandos at Gun Control

Kimberly Paxton
Link Removed
February 26th, 2013


Barack Obama’s “Cyber Warriors” have focused on a target – gun control.
Since they are new at this, apparently they’re not very good at covering their tracks, because Republican Representative Steve Stockman of Texas has identified a flurry of tweets against the 2nd Amendment as fraudulent. The accounts sending the tweets have been traced back to computer generated spambots. The accounts have not interacted with other accounts and two of them follow only one person, Obama’s former digital strategist, Brad Schenck.
According to Stockman, he received 16 tweets after Obama’s call for people to tweet their congressmen in support of strict gun control laws…and ten of those were fake.
“Obama’s anti-gun campaign is a fraud,” Stockman said. ”Obama’s supporters are panicking and willing to do anything to create the appearance of popular support, even if it means trying to defraud Congress,” he added. “I call upon the president to denounce this phony spam campaign.” (source)

So, all the stuff we keep hearing from the mainstream media about most of the population being pro-gun control? Just another deceitful illusion brought to you by the “fine” folks at the Obama administration. The person portraying himself as an upstanding citizen concerned about guns is most likely some pimple faced guy in a hooding, typing feverishly at his laptop in his mother’s basement.
Two days after his inauguration, the President launched his “Cyber-Warriors for Obama Project”, geared towards manipulating public opinion through social media. Douglas Hagmann interviewed a DHS insider, who brought to light the plan:
“…One section with the word “targets” had a list of religious web sites, web sites I recognized as Christian. Another section was a listing of conservative Internet sites. There was another tab with the label “problem sites” that seemed quite extensive. I looked at that section, and it was broken down further into “birther” sites, “pro-gun” sites, “anti-abortion” sites, just to name a few.
There was also a section of the usual news sites, like CNN, ABC, you know. Numerous e-mail addresses were conspicuous under each news organization, which also included Fox…
The first page of the binder had bullet points labeled “objectives” and instructions for the cyber-assets. There was also a very detailed non-disclosure agreement with the word “DRAFT” typed in big, light grey letters across the body of the two-page agreement. The agreement and the instructions were typed on white paper with a warning, printed in red on each page, that the document was not to be copied or disseminated.
The instructions seemed very specific. Infiltrate web forums, collect screen names, avatars, and posters’ tag lines, and attempt to resolve these to their actual identities. I read one paragraph that listed circumstances when the “asset” was only to monitor but do not disrupt without authorization. There was another section titled “Divert, Disrupt and Destroy,” listing “how to’s” in certain cases.
There was also a section on maintaining a social media presence, and another on the most effective use of Twitter.
Lastly, there was a “reference section,” which included statistics, specific language to use to marginalize different posters, and effective methods to discredit people while maintaining a sense of legitimacy.”
The chilling thing about all this?
There are 3575 people being employed by the Obama administration to dispense disinformation and sow discord in the Patriot movement. They have been taught how to create “personalities” and infiltrate groups as officers of distraction. If you are active in forums, on social media such as Facebook, or as a commenter on alternative news sites, you’ve most likely seen a recent uptick in trollery.
It’s just another day at the office for a cyber warrior. The Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propagandahas nothing on Obama’s Cyber Warriors.

Link Removed

 
They're called "sock puppets" and many are computer programs which operate on algorithms. Some are actual people who are paid to do this as the article states. The program or robot, whatever you want to call it, search the internet blogosphere for posts and based on thier programing they will leave thier own posts. Like the article says they are designed to create a disturbance/troll/manipulate public opinion. It is very reminiscent of the FBI's cointel pro which began in the 60s but this system is very high tech.
 
They're called "sock puppets" and many are computer programs which operate on algorithms. Some are actual people who are paid to do this as the article states. The program or robot, whatever you want to call it, search the internet blogosphere for posts and based on thier programing they will leave thier own posts. Like the article says they are designed to create a disturbance/troll/manipulate public opinion. It is very reminiscent of the FBI's cointel pro which began in the 60s but this system is very high tech.

Yes, it's truly amazing what programs can do in this day and age. The basement critters with nothing to do and are mad at the world love to sow chaos. Like the deranged who gun down innocents for imagined wrongs the world/society has done them.
 
I have seen several posters as of late that fill the bill as related in this post.

Have any of y'all seen any?
 
We've seen several come and go. Some got banned. There's only one that I suspect at the moment. The #1 tip-off is a lack of emotion. They are repetitive and start arguments that they themselves never participate in. They'll focus on something controversial. On another forum that I frequent, it's two different people (not bots). One always posts on global warming stuff, and the other always challenges anything said about Obama's eligibility, even when whatever was said was obviously just a joke. They are extremely careful about not being argumentative, and answer even very insulting replies to them dispassionately. That's so they're never the "bad guy" to the mods. They're Alinsky-esque in that regard, using the rules against the rule-makers.

Look for repetitive things around here by someone who posts their drivel and sits back watching people call them troll and other names without responding in kind. They'll start it with something like, "Nobody needs more than 10 rounds in a magazine." Take it from there.....

Blues
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,661
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining
Back
Top