Not a Zimmerman thread but a must read if you carry.

As a professor his tenure allows him to criticize legal matters without fear of reprisal from Harvard.
As an attorney he is bound by a code of ethics which frowns upon criticizing the competency of other attorneys.

AD is the king of appeals. His specialty is appealing cases where a subject has been found guilty or liable. This in itself sometimes requires he express opinions about ineffective counsel as an element of the appeal. In the Z case I believe he presented valid points.

But let's not forget he's worked to free known murderers like OJ Simpson and Klaus von Bulow. These were killers for which substantial evidence of guilt existed. It's one thing to work for a client where some doubt is possible, but it's another to zealously fight for a client who the lawyer knows in his heart is guilty. He's a brilliant lawyer but some of his past actions have proven harmful to society
 
That's why we have juries who decide whether someone is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. As a society wouldn't we rather have guilty people go free than innocent people be wrongly convicted? Finally, lawyers are advocates and any lawyer that gives it less than 100% would guilty of violating professional standards.
 
"She insisted that she is entitled to submit what, in effect, were half truths in an affidavit of probable cause, so long as she subsequently provides the defense with exculpatory evidence.

She should go back to law school, where she will learn that it is never appropriate to submit an affidavit that contains a half truth, because a half truth is regarded by the law as a lie, and anyone who submits an affidavit swears to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Before she submitted the probable cause affidavit, Corey was fully aware that Zimmerman had sustained serious injuries to the front and back of his head. The affidavit said that her investigators “reviewed” reports, statements and “photographs” that purportedly “detail[ed] the following.”

It then went on to describe “the struggle,” but it deliberately omitted all references to Zimmerman’s injuries which were clearly visible in the photographs she and her investigators reviewed.


The judge deciding whether there is probable cause to charge the defendant with second degree murder should not have been kept in the dark about physical evidence that is so critical to determining whether a homicide occurred, and if so, a homicide of what degree. By omitting this crucial evidence, Corey deliberately misled the court. "


To me this would be in favor of Zimmerman!
 
In today's society, Sometimes its not guilt,or innocent its a money game. The more you have the better off you are.

Its unfourninate that the legal system works this way. Wrong or right has taken a back seat too money.

Having a public defender is not a good thing he/she is working for wages that lets just say are not equal to what an high priced defense lawyer would charge.

And that effects how your case is handled, wether you go free or spend the rest of your life in jail.
 
Not really. When they find out you have money, they simply raise the bail amount so that you lose it all in bail money, or the use asset forfeiture laws to take it all. The system is broken and corrupt.
 
Witch hunt are expensive to defend against, no matter how much money you have, bond in Z case should have been lower than it was and now is. As I stated before I was not within 600 miles of the location and anyone else is welcome to opinion, but if you were not on site, it is just an opinion. Al and Jessie have a less than sterling past record of support for lies and innuendo.
 
There is a lot/everything on he line true but it's better to have public than no attorney-or to give you time to get better -and in some cases they even provide the excuse for appeal due to incompetence
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
49,525
Messages
610,668
Members
74,995
Latest member
tripguru365
Back
Top