nobamma's words and the truth


-06

New member
Following below the link I posted some historical facts debunking nobammy’s claims about his muzzie claims to fame. I despise to hear a supposedly honest person out right lie just to make something look good in the eyes of America. Watch the video and then the stats I found. WC

Who knows how valid the claim is that the administration tried to block this video, but the content is surely disturbing.
This is supposedly the video that FOX NEWS has been trying to show that is constantly blocked by the administration.

Watch this QUICKLY--before it gets Pulled -------- if your stomach allows it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28<http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28>

1st.. he claims the muzzies started the renascence but it actually got kicked off in Italy/Greece through Aristotle’s teachings and Thomas Aquinas along the 12th century.

2ond..the compass was used in China as early as the 4th century BC and later by English sailors.

3rd…Romans introduced the arch about 2ond century…again BC.

4th…Algebra—the Greek mathematician Diophantus is called the “father of algebra”.

5th…Printing was common in China by 3500—BC.

6th…The understanding of diseases was largely of western origins.

7th…Spires were developed and mastered by the English.

8th…Nobel prizes---this is amazing—only about a dozen muzzies have ever won a Nobel to the hundreds from other countries/faiths. Jews by far have won the most.

9th… The muzzie population was largely non existant until the late 1800s. It remained a very small minority until the last 20 or so years.

10th…muhammed died in 632 AD and only expounded on the koran the last 22 years of his life.

Well, just wanted to voice some historical facts to counter nobammies lies to the country and his addresses to other countries. Not only is he a blatant liar but anyone with any knowledge of history knows it when he voices these lies.
 

scottbland247

New member
Your points will never be evaluated fairly (for instance I won't even bother with them) as long as you insist on kindergarten name calling and cutesy mispronunciation of names
 

Oldgrunt

Active member
I can see why the Administration would not want this video shown. Glad you posted it for those people who say he isn't a Muslim. You have to take it for fact when you hear it direct from the horse's a..er...mouth.
After the next election, he can go live in one of those Muslim countries, if they will have him that is.
 

Oldgrunt

Active member
Your points will never be evaluated fairly (for instance I won't even bother with them) as long as you insist on kindergarten name calling and cutesy mispronunciation of names

Scott: Lighten up cupcake. The man was was stating facts to counter the lies of our illustrious leader. It seems like you don't like having facts told. Could it be that maybe you are a Democrat? Or maybe you believe that Obama is the paragon of virtue and truth? Geez, wake up son and don't be so uptight about 06 throwing a little humor into his post. He is right on the money but, as you said, you won't evaluate any of his points. Yeah, facts are hard to argue against.
 

scottbland247

New member
Your points will never be evaluated fairly (for instance I won't even bother with them) as long as you insist on kindergarten name calling and cutesy mispronunciation of names

Scott: Lighten up cupcake. The man was was stating facts to counter the lies of our illustrious leader. It seems like you don't like having facts told. Could it be that maybe you are a Democrat? Or maybe you believe that Obama is the paragon of virtue and truth? Geez, wake up son and don't be so uptight about 06 throwing a little humor into his post. He is right on the money but, as you said, you won't evaluate any of his points. Yeah, facts are hard to argue against.
I'm as libertarian as you can be and still be a christian republican. I dislike Obama just as much as dislike conservative ignorant people. I pointed out that he wouldn't be taken seriously by people because I want people against Obama to be successful and was hoping he would realize that speaking like an adult would increase his credibility....that ok with you cupcake?
 

Oldgrunt

Active member
I'm as libertarian as you can be and still be a christian republican. I dislike Obama just as much as dislike conservative ignorant people. I pointed out that he wouldn't be taken seriously by people because I want people against Obama to be successful and was hoping he would realize that speaking like an adult would increase his credibility....that ok with you cupcake?

Yeah, guess it isn't worth arguing over, huh?
 

-06

New member
Thanks OlGrunt but I meant absolutely no humor when talking about nobammy. As for an ignorant conservative--sir, I have more hours in college, night classes, and seminary training--oh what is the use "discussing" things with a close minded opinionated person of dubious political orientation. Ignore the message if you like. It is those with out compassion for country, morals, and economic security that put him in to begin with. You are getting exactly what you voted for--ignorant,no class, chicago ghetto BS and tactics. Big big problem is that your grand kids and mine will be paying for our mistake.
Vote for him to begin with to prove you are not a racist--vote against him next time to prove you are not an idiot.
 

Oldgrunt

Active member
Grunt, you are just grumpy enough that I think I would really like in real life

Grumpy? Yes.Stubborn? Yes. Opinionated? Yes. But other than that, I am an all around good fellow and get along well with others of the same ilk. I do sometimes get riled up and type things that make others mad but don't ever take it personal. I enjoy the repartee with everyone on here and, although I may disagree with some of them, I respect their right to their opinions. Have a good day!:laugh:
 

Grognard Gunny

New member
Sad fact of the matter is that Dems/Libs/Progs rarely approach ANY statement that counters their version of "truth" with counter point/facts or reasonable arguement. With probabilities approaching certainty, they will opt to attack the messenger.

Whether this is because they have no counter point to offer in arguement or they simply believe a reasonable "discussion" would totally confuse the average Dem Party voter/follower/supplicant/Government dependent, I'm not sure. Either way, it certainly destroys any effort to have a "debate".

The three "Ds" of Dem rhetorical efforts; "Demonize, Demean and Destroy!" Makes great entertainment for the feeble minded, obfuscates the object/point of discussion and makes for great one liner sound bites on Lib Media outlets.

What could be better for a pack of no-loads with no answers?

GG
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
49,435
Messages
623,619
Members
74,270
Latest member
rlrsk8r
Top