No Fly - No Buy


Wolfling68

New member
This is Dead.

H.R. 1167 [110th]: No Fly, No Buy Act of 2007 (GovTrack.us)

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy [D-NY]show cosponsors (1)
Cosponsors [as of 2009-01-08]
Rep. James Moran [D-VA]
Cosponsorship information sometimes is out of date. Why?
Text: Summary | Full Text
Status: Introduced Feb 16, 2007
Reported by Committee (did not occur)
Voted on in House (did not occur)
Voted on in Senate (did not occur)
Signed by President (did not occur)

This bill never became law. This bill was proposed in a previous session of Congress. Sessions of Congress last two years, and at the end of each session all proposed bills and resolutions that haven't passed are cleared from the books. Members often reintroduce bills that did not come up for debate under a new number in the next session.
Last Action: Mar 19, 2007: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
 

johnsteele

New member
Sounds like the New Government of the Obama States of America, our motto "We don't need no steeenking due process to get you."
 

rockwerks

New member
Sounds like the New Government of the Obama States of America, our motto "We don't need no steeenking due process to get you."
This has nothing to do with Obama but Rep. Carolyn McCarthy [D-NY] who is a livid anti gunner, she currently has several other anti gun bills in the works and the next AWB will come from her!
 
This has nothing to do with Obama but Rep. Carolyn McCarthy [D-NY] who is a livid anti gunner, she currently has several other anti gun bills in the works and the next AWB will come from her!

Obama may not be directly responsible but he would sign it and any other anti bill that comes across his desk into law. Whether anyone wants to admit it or not, Obama is just as anti as McCarthy, Pelosi, etc. If his roles were reversed he would probably co-sponsor the bill.
 

rockwerks

New member
Obama may not be directly responsible but he would sign it and any other anti bill that comes across his desk into law. Whether anyone wants to admit it or not, Obama is just as anti as McCarthy, Pelosi, etc. If his roles were reversed he would probably co-sponsor the bill.

This it the annual visit of this bill and I believe it has never made it out of committee. Lets keep and eye on it, but I believe that MR Obama is starting to see the light. the Left is feeling they voted for a turncoat after not releasing the torture photos and keeping the tribunals in process. I dont think he will sign anything that might mean political suicide. but I might be wrong
 
This it the annual visit of this bill and I believe it has never made it out of committee. Lets keep and eye on it, but I believe that MR Obama is starting to see the light. the Left is feeling they voted for a turncoat after not releasing the torture photos and keeping the tribunals in process. I dont think he will sign anything that might mean political suicide. but I might be wrong

I think the only reason he reversed his decision on releasing the photos is that he actually listened to his generals. When they told him it would place their troops in even greater danger he changed his mind. As for signing anti bills, I think he would readily do so because they had already made it through the Senate or Congress. I guess until it happens we will never really know.
 

rockwerks

New member
I think the only reason he reversed his decision on releasing the photos is that he actually listened to his generals. When they told him it would place their troops in even greater danger he changed his mind. As for signing anti bills, I think he would readily do so because they had already made it through the Senate or Congress. I guess until it happens we will never really know.

We can only hope and write letters
 
W

wolfhunter

Guest
I know that McCarthy signed onto HR 2159, but that that and this bill have anything to do with one another?

http://www.usacarry.com/forums/2nd-...-another-rino-sells-out-second-amendment.html

Cathy,
In a way, they do relate. In the No Fly/No Buy bill, those on the no fly list would be prohibited from buying firearms. In HR 2159, ANYONE the Attorney General designates as a potential terrorist would be prohibited. Since most Christian churches meet former-AG Ms. Reno's definition of a hate group, and most veterans have been defined as domestic terrorists by the current DHS, these two bills could greatly restrict our Second Amendment rights.
 

Bohemian

New member
Nat%27l_Svc_Signing.jpg


mmm... who is that woman in yellow at Obama's right hand?
GUN BAN CAROLYN MCCARTHY (D-NY)

Who else is in the picture? NO ONE THAT HAS EVER VOTED PRO-GUN...
 

Scarecrow

New member
This it the annual visit of this bill and I believe it has never made it out of committee. Lets keep and eye on it, but I believe that MR Obama is starting to see the light. the Left is feeling they voted for a turncoat after not releasing the torture photos and keeping the tribunals in process. I dont think he will sign anything that might mean political suicide. but I might be wrong

obama seeing the light?? isn't that an oxymoron? he said during his campaign that he does not want our guns.... guess what? he lied! you only need to look at his voting record to see that. if he had the chance to get them he would jump all over it.
 

Bohemian

New member
obama seeing the light?? isn't that an oxymoron? he said during his campaign that he does not want our guns.... guess what? he lied! you only need to look at his voting record to see that. if he had the chance to get them he would jump all over it.

Just posted my related take on this at...
http://www.usacarry.com/forums/2nd-...rces-dems-take-vote-gun-rights.html#post78037

Basically, its in Obama's best interest to sign this bill at this point in time, something he learned (and taught) from his mentor and author of Rules for Radicals... Saul Alinsky
 

rockwerks

New member
obama seeing the light?? isn't that an oxymoron? he said during his campaign that he does not want our guns.... guess what? he lied! you only need to look at his voting record to see that. if he had the chance to get them he would jump all over it.

Every president in history has lied to get into office, that is nothing new. But we have in the past also seen many presidents adjust their stance to make sure they get reelected. He has already told many in the house to drop the issue of the AWB.
 

Bohemian

New member
Every president in history has lied to get into office, that is nothing new. But we have in the past also seen many presidents adjust their stance to make sure they get reelected. He has already told many in the house to drop the issue of the AWB.

Obama's false assurances while in Mexico City that he will not at this time seek renewal of the ban on so-called "assault weapons," defies his own track record while the administration surrounding him sends his true gun control message to American citizens.

"I have not backed off at all from my belief that the gun -- the assault weapons ban made sense." -- Barack Obama

Senator Dianne Feinstein recently said "I will pick the time, and will pick the place and I will bring back the Clinton gun ban... And she said President Obama will sign it."
 

rockwerks

New member
Obama's false assurances while in Mexico City that he will not at this time seek renewal of the ban on so-called "assault weapons," defies his own track record while the administration surrounding him sends his true gun control message to American citizens.

"I have not backed off at all from my belief that the gun -- the assault weapons ban made sense." -- Barack Obama

Senator Dianne Feinstein recently said "I will pick the time, and will pick the place and I will bring back the Clinton gun ban... And she said President Obama will sign it."

Go ahead and show the articles where those quotes came from
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,154
Messages
621,735
Members
74,111
Latest member
ucf4
Top