More Then 90 Percent

Polls are useless, I call BS on those numbers and I also agree the questions were most likely phrased in a way to get the answers sought after. Just like the elections....fixed!
 
Boy! I sure am glad that my 15 round M&P .40 cal magazines are standard capacity!
I won't have to give them up!

I also haven't been able to find any high capacity M&P .40 cal mags though!
Please, feel free to point me in the right direction if you know of any "HIGH CAPACITY" mags for my STANDARD CAPACITY 15 round M&P .40 cal.

Thanks!
 
SR40c said:
Looks to me like they polled 1,772 registered voters who voted for Obama in the last election. It's like saying a poll on this website is an accurate indication of how the nation as a whole feels about a subject. Polls are subjective and easy to manipulate.
Click to expand...

Actually there was a poll done that said polls weren't subjective. :cheesy grin:
 
To me background checks are a no-brainer. Do you guys know of any other way to keep prohibited persons from buying guns at gun stores?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 
tattedupboy said:
To me background checks are a no-brainer. Do you guys know of any other way to keep prohibited persons from buying guns at gun stores?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. Convicted Criminals don't shop at gun stores for guns. Gang bangers don't shop for guns at gun stores. The poor slob that has a name similar to a convicted felon with a birthday in the same month and year. BLAM! He is affected.

So Until the so called "Universal Background Checks" include one gang banger doing a background check on the other gang banger he is selling to, the fluffy sounding back ground check only affects law abiding citizens. YUP sounds like a real crime stopper to me. Ahuka ahuka ahuka, but I got no brains.
 
We aren't talking checks at gun stores, they are already done. We're talking me selling my deer rifle to my brother or neighbor, who I've known my entire life, and having to pay to sell my private property. Universal checks are unenforceable. If I want to sell my rifle to my brother without going through a check, how does the government enforce it. They can't without universal registration. Which Chuckie Scummer now acknowledges would have to happen and is in fact the goal. No good will come from registration. It will lead to confiscation, as has happened on every other occasion, including in our own country as evidence by what has happen in California and the original assault weapon ban they passed years ago.
 
cgiven1 said:
We aren't talking checks at gun stores, they are already done. We're talking me selling my deer rifle to my brother or neighbor, who I've known my entire life, and having to pay to sell my private property. Universal checks are unenforceable. If I want to sell my rifle to my brother without going through a check, how does the government enforce it. They can't without universal registration. Which Chuckie Scummer now acknowledges would have to happen and is in fact the goal. No good will come from registration. It will lead to confiscation, as has happened on every other occasion, including in our own country as evidence by what has happen in California and the original assault weapon ban they passed years ago.
Click to expand...

There's actually more to it than that. You can't loan a gun without UBC. No loaning one to your mother, brother, sister or friend. You would have to run a check on anyone and everyone. There's a long list of no no's.
But most of all it's people control that's why none of them care how this affects law abiding citizens.
 
tattedupboy said:
To me background checks are a no-brainer. Do you guys know of any other way to keep prohibited persons from buying guns at gun stores?

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

Prohibited persons don't bother with gun stores, do they.
 
tattedupboy said:
And why is that? Because they know they wouldn't pass the background checks!

Sent from my Acer Iconia A200 tab using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...

Help me follow your logic here.

If gun stores do background checks,
but people who can't lawfully own a gun don't buy them from gun stores,
then background checks are effective ... how??

From your sig it looks like Tapatalk is working again. Woohoo!
 
kerb said:
Help me follow your logic here.

If gun stores do background checks,
but people who can't lawfully own a gun don't buy them from gun stores,
then background checks are effective ... how??

From your sig it looks like Tapatalk is working again. Woohoo!
Click to expand...

No, my logic is, they don't buy guns from gun stores because they know they won't be able to pass the background checks. If background checks weren't required, then isn't it conceivable that some prohibited persons would once again start buying guns in gun stores?

Sent from my Acer Iconia A200 tab using Tapatalk HD
 
People who can't buy guns from gun stores because of NICS just get them from off the street or steal them from our houses or said gun stores. Criminals and prohibited people will get their guns one way or another!
 
gejoslin said:
People who can't buy guns from gun stores because of NICS just get them from off the street or steal them from our houses or said gun stores. Criminals and prohibited people will get their guns one way or another!
Click to expand...

Yes, you're right. Let's keep the background checks to keep gun stores unavailable as a source for them!

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 
tattedupboy said:
Yes, you're right. Let's keep the background checks to keep gun stores unavailable as a source for them!

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

I have no problem with Nics but the Universial Background Checks I do. I should be able to give my guns to my son or grandson without having to run a UBC on them. Or loan my hunting rifle to them either. Or if my mother is having trouble with unsavory people in her neighbor hood and needs protection now not the next day after I run a UBC on her. People I've known all my life I shouldn't have to check them out to loan them a gun or gift it to them in my will.
That's what I have trouble with UBC.
 
gejoslin said:
I have no problem with Nics but the Universial Background Checks I do. I should be able to give my guns to my son or grandson without having to run a UBC on them. Or loan my hunting rifle to them either. Or if my mother is having trouble with unsavory people in her neighbor hood and needs protection now not the next day after I run a UBC on her. People I've known all my life I shouldn't have to check them out to loan them a gun or gift it to them in my will.
That's what I have trouble with UBC.
Click to expand...

Background checks of the universal variety would be virtually impossible to enforce anyway, and, just as with most other gun control laws, would make criminals out of otherwise law abiding citizens. I apparently mistook "universal" background checks to mean the same as the NICS check. To be clear, no one should have to worry about facing prosecution for giving a gun to a relative without a background check, which is exactly what such a law would do.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 278 (members: 0, guests: 278)

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,662
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining

Share this page

Back
Top