Overall I agree, though he's using some of those "facts" that have been passed around enough that people believe they're true.
Number one that states with higher gun ownership have less crime. Many of them do, but some of them don't. There isn't a clear correlation. The rates reflect population density and poverty rates rather than gun ownership rates.
Also, talking about penetration of standard versus hollow-point rounds. There are far too many factors in play during a shooting to say that a hollow point will only take down an attacker, while a full metal jacket will travel through. Anatomy is trickier than people realize.
He's also talking about qualifying, which is a nice thought, but not practical; and brandishing as defense, which is also a nice thought, but rife with issues.
I'm glad he's promoting a culture of defense, but I think there's a little bravado and trying to impress a pretty girl there.