MD pressuring Gov Snyder to veto SB 789...

  • Thread starter Thread starter ezkl2230
  • Start date Start date
E

ezkl2230

Guest
While I don't like some of the provisions of the verson of this bill that went to the gov, the fact remains that its passage would make MI a true shall issue state. Moms Demand wants to keep county gun boards in place, and they are trying to represent the bill as allowing all people under a PPO to own firearms. The bill does allow a non-violent individual under a PPO to own a firearm, but it is not a blanket license for everyone as MD would like everyone to believe. I still think Snyder will veto the bill.

http://lm.facebook.com/l.php?u=http...TCtUZhOVz2zrl6UGBIVsqvV1npgzcOibudkLlYtcg&s=1
 
The thing that bugs me is Gabby Gifford had/has a concealed carry permit, but when she went out to make a public speech she did not carry. Hence, you see what happened. Having a C/C permit and not carrying is liken to having an empty fire extinguisher in you house. Or, taking the batteries out of your fire alarm.
She is one of the worst examples to be telling anyone about use of guns.
 
Why was a PPO provision in this bill? I'm asking because I don't know. Isn't the outcome predictable.
2bit
 
Why was a PPO provision in this bill? I'm asking because I don't know. Isn't the outcome predictable.
2bit

They are tying to restore firearms rights to non-violent offenders.
 
Originally Posted by 2bit View Post
Why was a PPO provision in this bill? I'm asking because I don't know. Isn't the outcome predictable.
2bit
They are tying to restore firearms rights to non-violent offenders.
Or was that PPO portion a carefully calculated "poison pill" intended to cause a veto?
 
Seems like too much in the bill. Getting rid of gun boards and streamlining the permit process seems like a better fight to me.
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
49,525
Messages
610,668
Members
74,995
Latest member
tripguru365
Back
Top