I see where this can be a big debate over his right to continue to carry conceal legally...BUT if he has had his permit for as long as he said, then he should know that you don't need to flash or brag that you carry a gun, but then he has shown to others that hepacks a gun and apparently has a short fuse and has intimdated others by letting them know that he carries, then maybe this may be a case of removing the guns from him due to his mental instability..but then if he is that unstable, you take away his guns, that will piss him off even more, he will find a gun or two and take it out on those who did him wrong..see what I mean abt a big debate? So where does it go from here? What do you think? I think we all can agree that those who are not all there with the proper mind set could pose a danger to others with a loaded gun..
Anger doesn't mean you're going to lose all control of yourself and shoot up the place, you can be angry as all heck and still be reasonable enough to control yourself.Let's assume the characterization of the guy is accurate, that he is prone to fits of anger etc. What does that have to do with whether or not the state legislature's intent of the law was not to give local authorities autonomous control over CCW permit issuance?