E
ezkl2230
Guest
This was posted on guns.com:
Law Prof. David Kopel: 'Prohibitions on carrying knives in general, or of particular knives, are unconstitutional'
Interesting. We've been trying to overturn the switchblade ban in Michigan for several years, but the East-side legislators keep voting it down. I don't think anyone has ever approached it from this angle before.
The article also investigates case law about Bowie Knives and Arkansas Toothpicks, the utility of knives for personal self-defense and militia use, the constitutional significance of technological changes in knives since 1791, and modern prosecutions, statutes, and cases from Washington, Oregon, Indiana, New York and D.C.Under the Supreme Court’s standard in District of Columbia v. Heller, knives are Second Amendment “arms” because they are “typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,” including self-defense.There is no knife that is more dangerous than a modern handgun; to the contrary, knives are much less dangerous. Therefore, restrictions on carrying handguns set the upper limit for restrictions on carrying knives.
Prohibitions on carrying knives in general, or of particular knives, are unconstitutional. For example, bans of knives that open in a convenient way (e.g., switchblades, gravity knives, and butterfly knives) are unconstitutional. Likewise unconstitutional are bans on folding knives that, after being opened, have a safety lock to prevent inadvertent closure.
Law Prof. David Kopel: 'Prohibitions on carrying knives in general, or of particular knives, are unconstitutional'
Interesting. We've been trying to overturn the switchblade ban in Michigan for several years, but the East-side legislators keep voting it down. I don't think anyone has ever approached it from this angle before.