Keystone pipeline

SR9

New member
I may be wrong but here is my take on the Keystone Pipeline deal.

First off as you know or maybe don't know, most of all the railroad tankers that transport oil in America are owned by billionaire investor
and Obama financial contributor, Warren Buffet. I'm sure he has put the word on Obama, not to let Keystone happen. It would cost him billions. He gets paid for the oil they transport by the gallon.

But, here's another scenario that I've been think about. North America has more oil and natural gas than anybody else, or so I read. We can be oil independent if we want to, by passing Keystone. The laws on the books now say any refined oil or natural gas from the US has to stay in the US. Be that said we really don't need oil from anybody else to remain a strong country.

The Islamic terrorist (ISIS) and such want to take over all the Middle-East Oil Producing countries so they can control the world and it's economy. No here's where Obama plays in this. If he kills Keystone, he gets 3 for the price of 1. He makes Buffet happy, hence keeping money coming to the Liberal Progressive Democrats, and helps his Islamic brothers, by helping to destroy the US economy, and giving more power(by controlling world oil) to the enemies of America who are also bent on destroying America and Israel.

This is my take.....What's yours?
 
Control, it's all about control. Free market in a free society is a pipe dream. No such thing as either. Why do you think Putin wants to control the Ukraine and took over Crimea? It's all about the energy and the money it'll produce. Doesn't matter which continent your on.
 
Why do we need Keystone? The tree hugging nut jobs know that all the oil and alcohol we transport by train and/or truck puts out zero emission. So there's no need for a pipeline. :sarcastic: If they where true to their cause the tree huggers would support any pipe line. Follow the money.
 
I heard that the pipeline would suppress 28-40% carbon emissions due to no Truck/Train traffic. You would think they would hug this as well. BUT their nothing but watermelons. Green on the outside, RED on the inside.
-
Again in a free society with free trade one would think the most economical and safe transfer of hazardous materials is what the tree huggers would want...NOT! They continued to be directed and financed by overseas oil concerns dictating and pushing their agenda. Dependent on foreign oil is a main stay for political purpose. (corruption)
Hence why we still can't/won't be able to drill/export a universally consumed product. CONTROL.......! How would the dynamics change if we Exported to and reduced the price to the world? IMHO, an event changer that would be monumental.
 
There is more likeliness of environmental damage due to a train wreck carrying oil that there is of a spill from the pipeline. That is a matter of fact. The environment is safer with the Keystone Pipe line and so is America and it's economy.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,661
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining
Back
Top