E
ezkl2230
Guest
Believe it or not, the Bond Arms .410/.45 LC derringer was not Kalifornia compliant.
They had to shorten the barrel and remove barrel interchangeability to prevent it from chambering the .410 shell if they wanted to keep selling in Kali.
https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/bo...wer/?id=facebook&sid=fanpage_article_10-11-14
"Bond Arms had run afoul of California law because—and get ready for this one—their .45 Colt barrels could also chamber and fire—horror of horrors—2.5- or 3-inch .410 gauge shotshells. Of course the fact that BATFE does not classify the Bond Arms system as a shotgun because the barrel is rifled apparently never had any bearing on the decision of the California Legislature to focus on Bond Arms."
They had to shorten the barrel and remove barrel interchangeability to prevent it from chambering the .410 shell if they wanted to keep selling in Kali.
https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/bo...wer/?id=facebook&sid=fanpage_article_10-11-14