Dear ATF,
I would like to ask a question concerning the state of Indiana's expungement law (35-38-9).
A letter addressed to Lieutenant Peter B. Wood of the Indiana State Police in November of 2014, from ATF agent Michael Boxler indicated that the Federal Government would not consider a felony conviction expunged under Indiana Code 35-38-9 as a true expungement for the purpose of possessing a firearm, because Indiana does not provide a true expungement, and as long as that information was still available to law enforcement and could be used against a person in the future, it was not considered expungement by the federal government.
My question concerns the later part of Mr. Boxler's letter which indicates, IC 35-38-9-10(c) which states that a person granted expungement in the state of Indiana has had their civil rights restored would not count because the expungement was not sufficient. Why is that not sufficient under 18 U.S. Code § 921 to allow a person to own a firearm. Because 18 U.S. Code § 921 uses the word OR,
(ii) A person shall not be considered to have been convicted of such an offense for purposes of this chapter if the conviction has been expunged or set aside, or is an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the applicable jurisdiction provides for the loss of civil rights under such an offense) unless the pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms.
While I do understand Indiana's intent, that the sealed records are not misused to disguise continued criminal behavior and that fact that those records can be used to enhance a judges decision in sentencing does indicate a sealing and not a true expungement. Regardless, Indiana does state the a person's civil rights are restored and that person is is given the status of " A Proper Person" as of July of 2015 and under 18 U.S. Code § 921 a person that has had their civil rights restored may possess a firearm.
It is my understanding that the Federal Government's intent is not to quash or interfere with intent of a state government, it is clear with the latest changes in Indiana's criminal code 35-38-9 with the change of wording to 35-38-9-10(c): Except as provided in section 6(f) of this chapter, the civil rights of a person whose conviction has been expunged shall be fully restored, including the right to vote, to hold public office, to be a proper person under IC 35-47-1-7(2), and to serve as a juror, that Indiana clearly is trying to restore firearm rights to individuals that have been granted expungement under IC 35-38-9.
So my question is: since the recent changes to IC 35-38-9-10(c) as of July , 2015, does this restore an individuals rights to possess a firearm under 18 U.S. Code § 921
Thank you and Sincerely,
I would like to ask a question concerning the state of Indiana's expungement law (35-38-9).
A letter addressed to Lieutenant Peter B. Wood of the Indiana State Police in November of 2014, from ATF agent Michael Boxler indicated that the Federal Government would not consider a felony conviction expunged under Indiana Code 35-38-9 as a true expungement for the purpose of possessing a firearm, because Indiana does not provide a true expungement, and as long as that information was still available to law enforcement and could be used against a person in the future, it was not considered expungement by the federal government.
My question concerns the later part of Mr. Boxler's letter which indicates, IC 35-38-9-10(c) which states that a person granted expungement in the state of Indiana has had their civil rights restored would not count because the expungement was not sufficient. Why is that not sufficient under 18 U.S. Code § 921 to allow a person to own a firearm. Because 18 U.S. Code § 921 uses the word OR,
(ii) A person shall not be considered to have been convicted of such an offense for purposes of this chapter if the conviction has been expunged or set aside, or is an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the applicable jurisdiction provides for the loss of civil rights under such an offense) unless the pardon, expungement, or restoration of civil rights expressly provides that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms.
While I do understand Indiana's intent, that the sealed records are not misused to disguise continued criminal behavior and that fact that those records can be used to enhance a judges decision in sentencing does indicate a sealing and not a true expungement. Regardless, Indiana does state the a person's civil rights are restored and that person is is given the status of " A Proper Person" as of July of 2015 and under 18 U.S. Code § 921 a person that has had their civil rights restored may possess a firearm.
It is my understanding that the Federal Government's intent is not to quash or interfere with intent of a state government, it is clear with the latest changes in Indiana's criminal code 35-38-9 with the change of wording to 35-38-9-10(c): Except as provided in section 6(f) of this chapter, the civil rights of a person whose conviction has been expunged shall be fully restored, including the right to vote, to hold public office, to be a proper person under IC 35-47-1-7(2), and to serve as a juror, that Indiana clearly is trying to restore firearm rights to individuals that have been granted expungement under IC 35-38-9.
So my question is: since the recent changes to IC 35-38-9-10(c) as of July , 2015, does this restore an individuals rights to possess a firearm under 18 U.S. Code § 921
Thank you and Sincerely,