I have been following a lot of posts here in all categories for many months and finally decided to post some questions. I have determined based upon the remarks, questions, opinions, and attitudes I have read about and observed that seemingly very few folks here have had any real quality training at all, ever! I hope I am wrong but doubt it.
I am talking about training lasting 4-5 days at least 10 hrs a day. On the order of GUNSITE, FRONTSIGHT, THUNDER RANCH, SEATTLE FIREARMS SCHOOL, US TRAINIG ACADEMY, LFI, etc... I may have left out a few, but u get the idea. Half of the classes are on the line and half in class rooms.
I base my thought on some of the remarks here. I have seen people state what sort of incident would provoke them into shooting at someone, and from my education it would seem not to qualify prima facie for self defense.
My question today is what factors on the surface do you readers believe would justify a self defence shooting. As a start I will hint in general you need at least 4 factors, possibly 3 minimum, but in rare circumstances. Usually all 4.
Let's see what our forum members come up with.
I am talking about training lasting 4-5 days at least 10 hrs a day. On the order of GUNSITE, FRONTSIGHT, THUNDER RANCH, SEATTLE FIREARMS SCHOOL, US TRAINIG ACADEMY, LFI, etc... I may have left out a few, but u get the idea. Half of the classes are on the line and half in class rooms.
I base my thought on some of the remarks here. I have seen people state what sort of incident would provoke them into shooting at someone, and from my education it would seem not to qualify prima facie for self defense.
My question today is what factors on the surface do you readers believe would justify a self defence shooting. As a start I will hint in general you need at least 4 factors, possibly 3 minimum, but in rare circumstances. Usually all 4.
Let's see what our forum members come up with.
Last edited: