jstnptchtt
New member
[The following post may need to be moved for more accurate categorization.]
Our town is getting a new, locally-owned pizza place, and it's generating a modest amount of interest, mostly for its location and style. The bad news is that they share management with a number of other local restaurants that prohibit firearms. (Considering that they've had Link Removed, I have a feeling that policy won't change anytime soon.) More than likely, the new venue will maintain the same policy.
The question of whether or not they would instate that policy, however, led me to question what I would do if the two restaurants ended up with two different policies on lawful carry. My ultimate determination was that I would probably avoid the one that permitted firearms. Sure, they might find higher sales at one than the other and try to find out why that is, but to me, my money would ultimately be going to a management staff that is antagonistic to law-abiding citizens carrying in their properties. I don't think I could stomach that.
So, what's your take? Would you patronize a business that did not itself bar you from carrying, or would you skip it for its management not liking your handgun?
Our town is getting a new, locally-owned pizza place, and it's generating a modest amount of interest, mostly for its location and style. The bad news is that they share management with a number of other local restaurants that prohibit firearms. (Considering that they've had Link Removed, I have a feeling that policy won't change anytime soon.) More than likely, the new venue will maintain the same policy.
The question of whether or not they would instate that policy, however, led me to question what I would do if the two restaurants ended up with two different policies on lawful carry. My ultimate determination was that I would probably avoid the one that permitted firearms. Sure, they might find higher sales at one than the other and try to find out why that is, but to me, my money would ultimately be going to a management staff that is antagonistic to law-abiding citizens carrying in their properties. I don't think I could stomach that.
So, what's your take? Would you patronize a business that did not itself bar you from carrying, or would you skip it for its management not liking your handgun?