Hillary Clinton: The Supreme Court is Wrong on the Second Amendment


opsspec1991

Active member
Hillary Clinton: The Supreme Court is Wrong on the Second Amendment
.
The left has shown quite an affinity in recent years for eroding First Amendment free speech rights. They have sought to shut down any speech that is conservative or does not support certain liberal policies.
.
Recently, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced that the Department of Justice was looking into ways to take legal action against those who speak out against global warming fearmongering.
.
While liberals have proven their contempt for the First Amendment, they reserve their true hatred for the Second Amendment — the right to keep and bear arms. No politician has been more outspoken against American gun owners than Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton.
.
Clinton has even used the issue of gun control to outflank her opponent, socialist Senator Bernie Sanders’ left. The fact that the aging Marxist earned a D- from the National Rifle Association (NRA) apparently is not good enough for Hillary Clinton.
.
In the 2016 election, Clinton has often intimated that she will curtail the rights of legal gun owners in this country if elected president.
.
Now, in a leaked audio recording, Clinton states outright that she will do just that. To listen what the former first lady and secretary of state had to say about chipping away at the Second Amendment.
When you manage to out-liberal your socialist opponent on an issue, it may be a cause for alarm for voters. But that is exactly what Hillary Clinton is doing in the Democratic primary.
.
In a newly released audio recording that was likely obtained at a private event, Hillary Clinton could be heard savaging the National Rifle Association and gun rights.
.
“So I’m going to speak out. I’m going to do everything I can to rally people against this pernicious, corrupting influence of the NRA,” Clinton could be heard saying.
.
“And we’re going to do whatever we can. I’m proud when my husband took them on and we were able to ban assault weapons but he had to put a sunset on it so, 10 years later, of course, Bush wouldn’t agree to reinstate them.
.
“We’ve got to go after this,” Clinton vowed.
.
“Here again, the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment and I am going to make that case every chance I get.”
.
Considering Hillary Clinton’s well-documented history of extensive flip-flopping, it would not shock anyone if she turns back into Annie Oakley when the general election comes around.
.
After all, this is the candidate who ran to Barack Obama’s right on the issue of guns in 2008. It seems clear, however, that her opinions expressed behind closed doors reveal her true feelings on the Second Amendment.
.
Watch the video and on the next page:
.
Read More: Hillary Clinton: The Supreme Court is Wrong on the Second Amendment | Truth And Action
.
My Thoughts:
.
Wake up people PLEASE!
.
You have to see that these people are trying to destroy our constitution and America. They can't stop the criminals so they are coming after law abiding Americans. Can you seriously trust someone to "uphold and defend" the constitution when they are trying so hard to destroy it? God help us all.
 

opsspec1991

Active member
Hillary Clinton’s fierce anti-gun stance could backfire in general election
.
By David Sherfinski
.
Democrats, skittish over pushing gun control since Al Gore’s bid for the White House fell short in 2000, are once again flirting with the issue, preparing to pick perhaps the most anti-gun presidential nominee in a generation.
.
Hillary Clinton’s provocations will be on the minds of thousands of Second Amendment activists gathering in Louisville beginning Thursday as the National Rifle Association hosts its annual meetings, insisting Mrs. Clinton’s fierce gun control stance will once again hamstring Democrats in a national election.
.
Likely GOP nominee Donald Trump will speak Friday, delivering his fervent pro-gun stance to the one part of the conservative coalition that has quickly and eagerly embraced him — which makes the contrast with Mrs. Clinton, who’s highlighted her anti-gun stance, all the more striking.
.
“She’s already viewed as the enemy by the gun rights people anyway, so she’s not losing any votes by saying ‘Look, I think we should enact tougher gun laws in these areas like uniform background checks and some other things,’ ” said Robert J. Spitzer, who chairs the political science department at SUNY Cortland in New York.
.
He said Mrs. Clinton is the first Democratic candidate since Mr. Gore in 2000 to really try to use the issue as a campaign wedge — attacking her remaining opponent for the Democratic nomination, Sen. Bernard Sanders, as too conservative after he voted to grant lawsuit immunity to the firearms industry last decade.
.
“I’m going to keep talking about it, and we’re going to make it clear that this has to be a voting issue,” Mrs. Clinton said at an MSNBC town hall last month. “If you care about this issue, vote against people who give in to the NRA and the gun lobby all the time.”
.
Read More: Hillary Clinton's fierce anti-gun stance could backfire in general election - Washington Times
.
My Thoughts:
.
Hillary Clinton is promising to gut the Second Amendment if she becomes president. But if we - and America's law-abiding gun owners - have anything to say about it, she won't get the chance.
 

S&W645

NRA Life Member
Trump called for her to disarm her Secret Service agents as a show of her commitment today at the NRA convention where he was being endorsed for President. While I don't care for the man personally, he did get that idea right. :D
 

SR9

New member
I was a Ted Cruz supporter until he dropped out. That being said, I will support Donald J. Trump and was glad to hear he was being endorsed by the NRA. I have been a member for years. I know some of the things Trump is promising will never happen, but what worries me more is that the things Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders is promising can and probably will happen. I know that Donald Trump is a licensed concealed carry guy, like me and most of us. I feel he is our only hope of keeping our 2nd Amendment Rights, as with any of the other candidates the 2nd Amendment would be doomed. If that be the case, then your 1st Amendment Right would soon be gone.
And, let's not forget the people running for the Senate, The House, and your local state, county and city offices. Are they Pro-2nd Amendment? You need to know. If they are you need to support them. A vote for them is a vote for you and your rights.
 

G50AE

Well-known member
And, let's not forget the people running for the Senate, The House, and your local state, county and city offices. Are they Pro-2nd Amendment? You need to know. If they are you need to support them. A vote for them is a vote for you and your rights.
That's good advice in any election cycle.
 

Ringo

A WATCHMAN
It no longer matters who votes, only who counts the votes matters. The corruption of the Presidential election being stolen like it was should have been enough for people to figure it out, but it wasn't. The same corruption was allowed again without question in the Georgia election, then followed by the California governor recall. The powers that be will never again allow a clean and fair election to challenge their total control and NWO agenda, never. If you think otherwise, think again.

For decades the American people have been electing the same politicians over and over again regardless of their character and ethics. Because the American people vote, the greatest enemy of our country are it's own citizens. The American citizenry has become so corrupt that it's representatives in government are pedophiles, homosexual, lesbian, transsexual & bi-sexual perverts, Muslims, Marxists, Socialists, Communists and Baby Killers.

The America we grew up in no longer exists, and considering the path that America is currently on, America deserves every ounce of what is happening to it. It's going to get a lot worse, we're just witnessing the beginning of a nightmare never to be awakened from. It's impossible to reverse course, be it the secular view of a New World Order or the biblical One World Government of antichrist, it's immanent and right on schedule.
God uses prophecy to prove He is who He says He is, and to authenticate ALL of the warnings and the promises found in the Bible. Deny it or not prophecy is being fulfilled before our very eyes. According to three different Gospel's ((Matthew 24:34 - Mark 13:30 - Luke 21:32 ) -"Truly I Tell You, This Generation (1948-2028) Will Certainly Not Pass Away Until ALL These Things Have Happened"- we are already 73 years into this last generation of 80 years (Psalm 90:10). We are not just in the last of the last days, we are in the last hours. The question at this late hour is: who is listening and who is watching?
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,435
Messages
623,627
Members
74,270
Latest member
rlrsk8r
Top