Hillary Clinton: "rein in" gun ownership and carry...

  • Thread starter Thread starter ezkl2230
  • Start date Start date
E

ezkl2230

Guest
"...at the rate we're going, we're going to have so many people with guns everywhere, fully licensed, fully validated" in settings like movie theaters where shootings have arisen over seemingly mundane things like loud gum chewing or cellphone use.


"That's what happens in the countries I've visited where there is no rule of law and no self-control and that is something that we cannot just let go without paying attention," she said."
Click to expand...

And yet, violent crime is at historic lows even though firearms ownership and carry is at historic highs! And because we have the rule of law, in the FEW cases in which something like this has taken place, the guilty persons have been HELD ACCOUNTABLE for their crimes!


Sorry, Hill, your logic just doesn't add up!

Link Removed
 
The shootings in movie theaters are hardly a blip on the radar, compared to shootings in the 'hood.

Ban gangs, not guns. It's as freaking simple as that.


Oh, wait, they've tried that, didn't work.

How about if we ban politicians?
 
Capt. Frank said:
And God save us, Hillary may be the next President!
Click to expand...

No kidding. That's the really crappy part our system as it works now... the republicans and democrats can put up whatever crazy candidate they want and we'll vote for them because the alternative is terrifying, rather than us voting for who we really believe in. I forget which states, but there were several that didn't provide the option for a write-in, therefore restricting who you could vote for to who paid to be on the ballot. I was following T.J. O'Hara during the last election... he refused to buy in or raise/spend money on a campaign, so I got to hear all about it. If anyone's interested I'll go looking for the info.
 
Trouble is there is a percentage of people that will vote for a D or R know matter who it is. Doesn't even matter if they are dead or alive. They will vote straight down party lines. Integrity means nothing to this percentage of voters.
 
fuhr52 said:
Trouble is there is a percentage of people that will vote for a D or R know matter who it is. Doesn't even matter if they are dead or alive. They will vote straight down party lines. Integrity means nothing to this percentage of voters.
Click to expand...

Don't forget to add the percentage of people who think voting for anyone other than a D or R is "wasting" a vote. It only is if that's all everyone does! If everyone were to suddenly stop voting for who the party tells them to (too bad that won't happen) and started voting for who they believe in, things might work a lot better.
 
Capt. Frank said:
And God save us, Hillary may be the next President!
Click to expand...
The urban vote wins elections nowadays. And the dregs, liberals, thug-huggers, minorities, welfare mongers and run-of-the-mill leeches live there. Our large cities are hijacking the electoral college in that those outside of large cities have no vote. Just look at what has happened to NYS. NYC holds 40% of the population... and 40% of the vote. Upstate rural voters have absolutely no vote anymore.
 
BC1 said:
The urban vote wins elections nowadays. And the dregs, liberals, thug-huggers, minorities, welfare mongers and run-of-the-mill leeches live there. Our large cities are hijacking the electoral college in that those outside of large cities have no vote. Just look at what has happened to NYS. NYC holds 40% of the population... and 40% of the vote. Upstate rural voters have absolutely no vote anymore.
Click to expand...

This is the case all over the country. In fact I heard the comment over the weekend if you eliminate Eugene and Portland, Oregon becomes Wyoming.
 
She didn't give a damn when her ambassador and 3 brave former military were slaughtered so it's a fair bet she doesn't care whatever befalls the average American, or us "bitter clingers" as her boss refers to us. I'm glad she said what she said as it's on the table for us to fight against and can't be denied by a pathological liar of her caliber. Know your enemy.
 
fuhr52 said:
Trouble is there is a percentage of people that will vote for a D or R know matter who it is. Doesn't even matter if they are dead or alive. They will vote straight down party lines. Integrity means nothing to this percentage of voters.
Click to expand...


it is assumed that 40% of voters will vote R and another 40% will vote D regardless of the qualification or suitability of their party's candidate. The battle is always for the 20% "uncommitted" voters. This is based on old research. I think they will find that a growing percentage of voters are seriously looking at third party alternatives to the establishment parties.

What is NOT in dispute is that Hill has announced that she will declare war on gun owners if she is elected; Heaven help us if she does what many are suggesting she do and chooses hubby Slick Willie as her veep.
 
What is the proper balance? We have none and they have them all I presume? As it has been said over and over it's not about guns it's about control and they can't control an armed nation and because they know we know what they are up to they are scared s***less.
 
sdprof said:
The shootings in movie theaters are hardly a blip on the radar, compared to shootings in the 'hood.

Ban gangs, not guns. It's as freaking simple as that.


Oh, wait, they've tried that, didn't work.

How about if we ban politicians?
Click to expand...

Legalize drugs to kill the profit but oh wait isn't the CIA the largest importer and exporter of illicit drugs so that wouldn't work.
 
I learned today from an individual that there Special Forces were 30 minutes away by helicopter, there was constant communication between this special force team and the WH before, during and after, the WH house knew what was going on and the special forces were ordered to stand down. Why? Hillary and the WH let these people die.....Why? They were sacrificed for what purpose? it'll be another lie no doubt!
 
longslide10 said:
What is the proper balance? We have none and they have them all I presume? As it has been said over and over it's not about guns it's about control and they can't control an armed nation and because they know we know what they are up to they are scared s***less.
Click to expand...
.
This is EXACTLY it. From the statist point of view, it IS completely "out of balance" unless in all social equations they have all the power, and the individual or disfavored have none.
 
Last edited:
fuhr52 said:
Trouble is there is a percentage of people that will vote for a D or R know matter who it is. Doesn't even matter if they are dead or alive. They will vote straight down party lines. Integrity means nothing to this percentage of voters.
Click to expand...

So long as we have closed and not open primaries we will continue to have a poor selection of canadates to choose from. A 2 party system is failing to serve the best of the best up for review.
 
Don't believe an open primary will make much difference. We have a minority of rich agenda driven people that can afford to buy the politicians they want. You see it on both sides of the isle. Rich liberals are pure as the wind driven snow and rich conservatives are greedy slave owners. Just ask Harry Reid. Those that have the money to buy political influence will buy it. The politicians they buy are expected to give them a return on their investment. When we figure a way to run campaigns without money things may change. Good luck on that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 138 (members: 0, guests: 138)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,662
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining

Share this page

Back
Top