Hide your porn!


tricolordad

Banned
Here come the libs! Looks like that gun is an assault weapon now, too.
Suddenly a burka clad woman is lookin pretty good, huh? Lolz
 

JohnD13

New member
I guess Dillon's Blue Pres catalog will have to have a plain brown wrapper now. Never saw one of those ladies in a burka!
 

etazelaar

New member
I was in the Marine Corps during the "Tail Hook" incident and we had something quit similar happen. We had 24 hours of mandatory anti discrimination training. But we were told to hide the porn and other questionable items. You definitely didn't leave it out in common areas, except squad bays. It had better be well hidden during inspections.
 

azhusker

New member
Achmed the dead terrorist? A stand up comics puppet! Maxim magazine? A Ken doll in swim trunks? Oh the horror!

Some of the items I can understand, but others are just plain PC stupid.
 

tricolordad

Banned
Achmed the dead terrorist? A stand up comics puppet! Maxim magazine? A Ken doll in swim trunks? Oh the horror!

Some of the items I can understand, but others are just plain PC stupid.

Speaking of contraband...
We had a voodoo doll made of shrapnel, torn dcus and epoxy. His name was Habib. He rode on the dash of our hmmvw for 3 tours. He retired to the bottom of a water truck tank. What a clown.
 

nosreme

Member
Fortunately, it was a workplace-only initiative. The really galling thing here is the continued expansion of "offensiveness" (and even worse, "possibility of offensiveness") as the standard for acceptability of expression. At the Air Force Academy several years ago, a cadet was ordered to remove a beach picture of himself, mother, sister, and girlfriend all in swimming suits from his dorm room bookshelf. As this was also concern-over alcohol time, another cadet was ordered to remove an intricate German beerstein from his room because it "could be perceived as glorifying alcohol."
 

gunnerbob

PEW Professional
The PC is everywhere, and it's only getting worse... I remember when two E-9s came around our workcenters like a month ago looking for stuff, I was suprised they didn't flag a small poster we have that is of a fake med called, "No One Cares, The Pill For Chronic Complainers... Recommended To Be Taken With A Nice Tall Glass Of Shut The Hell Up". I thought they would have gotten us for that one....
 

Nightmare45

NRA LIFE MEMBER
My dad who whet ashore at Normandy is most likley turning over in his grave no Betty Grable, I have no issue with dead terrorist or anyone who supports them, they had no issue with killing us. Served from 66-70 not my Air Force.
 

fudo

New member
I'm shocked, shocked, I tell you! Porn in a massively male environment!:wink: Maybe those soldiers should not look at women as fantasy sex partners, it would probably suit the pain in the ass PC professional complainers if they were attracted to each other. :biggrin:No, wait! The swim trunk clad Ken doll is out too.:sarcastic: What's a young, healthy male 8000 miles from home to do? Oh, my! And people wonder why people don't want to hire women and "out groups", likely to force change by penalizing what up to then, normal, acceptable behavior, first time an over sensitive person gets butt hurt, and places men with otherwise good service records in jeopardy.:angry:
Men are men and women are women, and PC insanity will not change that. If a woman wants to enter an all male group, she should be ready to adapt to the group norms and not expect the group to adapt to her.:eek:

BTW, I wonder why, in the wake of the idiotic ok to allow women in combat, no one that I heard or read mentioned the Israeli experience in using women in front line combat units.:confused: It was an unmitigated disaster. Women who were captured by muslim terrorists were raped and tortured, close to their units, so their comrades could hear their cries. What had previously been a well-disciplined unit turned into a mob intent on rescuing their women. Many casualties resulted.



This from WND.com Link Removed
Despite 225 years of witnessing the horror of wars fought by male American soldiers, there are still a number of idiots – mostly feminists who themselves will never have to face an armed enemy soldier – pushing lawmakers to drop a ban against allowing women in combat.

Israel – a nation of about 6.2 million people constantly at war with its neighbors – allowed women in combat, the idiots shriek. Why, then, must the American military, as regards ground combat roles, remain so androcentric, so “male-centered”?

It’s time to debunk the myth, once and for all, that Israel’s experience with allowing women in combat was successful and, therefore, should be duplicated by the Pentagon. It wasn’t successful. It was a disaster by Israel’s own admission.

“History shows that the presence of women has had a devastating impact on the effectiveness of men in battle,” wrote John Luddy in July 27, 1994, for the Heritage Foundation backgrounder.

“For example, it is a common misperception that Israel allows women in combat units. In fact, women have been barred from combat in Israel since 1950, when a review of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War showed how harmful their presence could be. The study revealed that men tried to protect and assist women rather than continue their attack. As a result, they not only put their own lives in greater danger, but also jeopardized the survival of the entire unit. The study further revealed that unit morale was damaged when men saw women killed and maimed on the battlefield,” Luddy said.

Writes Edward Norton, a reservist in the Israel Defense Forces: “Women have always played an important role in the Israeli military, but they rarely see combat; if they do, it is usually by accident. No one in Israel, including feminists, has any objection to this situation. The fact that the Persian Gulf War has produced calls to allow women on the front lines proves only how atypical that war was and how little Americans really understand combat.”

“Few serious armies use women in combat roles. Israel, which drafts most of its young women and uses them in all kinds of military work, has learned from experience to take them out of combat zones. Tests show that few women have the upper-body strength required for combat tasks. Keeping combat forces all male would not be discriminatory, as were earlier racial segregation schemes in the military, because men and women are different both physically and psychologically,” said the Feb. 5, 1990, National Review.

Furthermore, Israeli historian Martin Van Creveld has written extensively about the failure of the IDF to successfully integrate and use women in combat.

Finally, even Israeli citizens don’t relish the thought of allowing their women into combat roles. In 1998, a survey conducted by the Jerusalem Post newspaper found that 56 percent of Israelis don’t want women in combat.

There are now and always will be idiots who say the Pentagon should put women in any combat unit they wish to serve. Most of these people will speak with the ignorance of never having had to experience the horror of combat, as well as the luxury of never having to worry about engaging in armed conflict themselves.

But to use the “Israeli experience” as an allegedly successful model for the U.S. to follow is not only absurd, it’s disingenuous. It is a lie propagated by radical feminists like ex-Democratic Rep. Patricia Schroeder who have falsely claimed that such a goal is merely an extension of “the will of the people.”

Perhaps if more lawmakers – and Americans in general – were exposed to military service, the idiots who seem to be dominating this debate wouldn’t have many sympathetic ears.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
49,491
Messages
624,259
Members
74,334
Latest member
johnporter
Top