The restrictions on your permit are administrative rather than by statute. So you can't be prosecuted for violating them but you could have your permit revoked if you violate hem.
What reason did you give the judge for wanting an unrestricted concealed carry permit?
You are correct that the restrictions are enforced by administration (not criminal) but they are by statute. Depending on the severity of the violation a judge may revoke permanently or opt to suspend the permit for a period.
ARTICLE 400--LICENSING AND OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO FIREARMS
See §400.00(2)(f)
Paragraph-2 states:
A license for a pistol or revolver, other than an assault weapon or a disguised gun, shall be issued to (a) have and possess in his dwelling by a householder; (b) have and possess in his place of business by a merchant or storekeeper; (c) have and carry concealed while so employed by a messenger employed by a banking institution or express company; (d) have and carry concealed by a justice of the supreme court in the first or second judicial departments, or by a judge of the New York city civil court or the New York city criminal court; (e) have and carry concealed while so employed by a regular employee of an institution of the state, or of any county, city, town or village, under control of a commissioner of correction of the city or any warden, superintendent or head keeper of any state prison, penitentiary, workhouse, county jail or other institution for the detention of persons convicted or accused of crime or held as witnesses in criminal cases, provided that application is made therefor by such commissioner, warden, superintendent or head keeper;
(f) have and carry concealed, without regard to employment or place of possession, by any person when proper cause exists for the issuance thereof;
The "proper cause" provision of Sub-paragraph (f) constitutes any restrictions placed on the carry of a pistol as determined by the licensing officer. A permit holder found to be in violation of this paragraph is not subject to prosecution but may have his/her permit revoked for a violation.
Crazy isn't it? Another bugger is in Article 265 - FIREARMS AND OTHER DANGEROUS WEAPONS. This section of the penal law states that it is illegal for any person to posses a loaded firearm. Then in §265.20 you are exempted from criminal possession of a weapon if you've been issued a license under ARTICLE 400. Unfortunately I get to teach this crap. You should see the puzzled look on students' faces. Very ambiguous and contradictory laws.