Forks Made me fat

Jessica Carlson

Shoot like a Girl
So, I've been hearing a lot from both sides of the fence. The most shocking of which include a coworker asking why citizen's "should be allowed to buy fully automatic weapons" and multiple gun enthusiast's stating "fork's made me fat" as their most catchy come-back phrase to those pointing fingers at them. So to help out both sides I'm posting a condensed version of the information as I know it. The gun-haters of this country are fueled by misinformation and it's time we take back our nation for what is was meant to be: free.


1791: Second Amendment Ratified to state: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." See U.S. Constitution.

1934 National firearms act: eliminated automatic-fire weapons, short-barreled shotguns and rifles, parts of guns like silencers, as well as other "gadget-type" firearms hidden in canes. All gun sales and gun manufacturers were slapped with a $200 tax ($2,525 today if not more) on each firearm, and all buyers were required to fill out paperwork subject to Treasury Dept. approval.

In 1938 the Federal Firearms Act required anyone involved in the selling of firearms was required to obtain a Federal Firearms License from the Secretary of Commerce and prohibited those same sellers from selling to those people who were convicted of certain crimes or lacked a permit.

The 1968 Gun Control Act restricted handgun sales over state lines; the list of persons dealers could not sell to grew to include those convicted of felonies (with some exceptions), those found mentally incompetent, drug users and more. The act also defined persons who were banned from possessing firearms and prevented the purchase of firearms via mail order.

In 1986 the Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act made it illegal for anyone to manufacture or import armor piercing ammunition, or "cop-killer bullets," which are capable of penetrating bulletproof clothing. While the Firearms Owners' Protection Act eased restrictions on gun sellers and the sale of some guns. Imposed additional penalties for persons using a firearm during certain crimes and persons with robbery or burglary convictions who are illegally shipping guns.

In 1990 the Crime Control Act aimed at enforcing a "drug-free school zones," included criminal penalties for possessing or discharging a firearm in a school zone and outlawed the assembly of illegal semiautomatic rifles or shotguns from legally imported parts.

1994 the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act aka "Assault weapons ban" banned the manufacture, possession, and importation of new semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices (or magazines) for civilian use. In addition to prohibiting juveniles from possessing or selling handguns. It also directed the attorney general to evaluate proposed and existing state juvenile gun laws.

In 1994 to 1998 the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act imposed a five-day waiting period and background check before a licensed gun importer, manufacturer or dealer can sell or deliver a handgun to an unlicensed individual and requires all gun dealers to run background checks on all potential buyers using the National Instant Criminal Background Check system which is run by the FBI.

and in 1999 the Gun Bill Requires Trigger Locks A bill is passed which requires all newly made hand guns to have a trigger lock. The bill also extends the waiting period and background checks of firearms being sold at gun shows.

Long story short the last significant federal gun law was 1994' s Assault Weapons Ban, passed five years BEFORE Columbine and almost 9 years BEFORE this years shootings. As a country we need to educate ourselves on what is already out there and start holding each other accountable for the things each of us choose to do outside the law.
 
If we were dealing with logical common sense people, facts would be important. But we are dealing with progressive liberal special interests that thrive on pure emotion. They don't care about any facts that don't fit their agenda.
 
If we were dealing with logical common sense people, facts would be important. But we are dealing with progressive liberal special interests that thrive on pure emotion. They don't care about any facts that don't fit their agenda.

If I replyed to this I would be banned.
 
There is a national program that provides low-income people with free or discounted phones, but it was started under George W. Bush, Obama's Republican predecessor. Do I personally care who really started the program? No. Do I listen to anyone who pops off without doing a minimal amount of research? No.

There will be a national discussion on gun control in this country very soon. If you haven't done your research, if you haven't taken the time to provide thoughtful answers to the ensuing questions, please, just don't comment. You'll do more harm than good.
 
Don't you just love it when people tell you what you should or shouldn't do with your constitutional right of free speech?
Even an idiot has the right to free speech.
And you have the ability to listen or not to listen.
What maybe idiotic to you maybe brilliant to some one else.
If we're going to have a conversation about guns, every one gets to talk. Or what's the point?
All laws apply to every one or no one. Isn't that what the Constitution is all about? We the People.
 
People have to understand that under the bed is not securing your weapons. They have to be secured in a manner that family friends or a thief cannot get them. I have talked to people who voted him back in all they can say is "I didn't know this or that would happen"
 
People have to understand that under the bed is not securing your weapons. They have to be secured in a manner that family friends or a thief cannot get them. I have talked to people who voted him back in all they can say is "I didn't know this or that would happen"

A politician lied? He said one thing and did the opposite, who would have thought?
 
If we were dealing with logical common sense people, facts would be important. But we are dealing with progressive liberal special interests that thrive on pure emotion. They don't care about any facts that don't fit their agenda.
If I replyed to this I would be banned.


The most convincing lies are those which are half truths. Anyone with an agenda, political or not, needs to know the facts about what they are speaking on. Not only to defend their opinion adequately from the subsequent attack but also to present their idea/product/opinion in the best light possible, it's nothing more then a carefully concealed sales pitch, and because a large number of individual's are not willing to do their own research in order to form their own opinion they usually pick the side that sounds best to them.

I too must admit I'm curious what you would have said :)
 
Regardless of who would have been president I think that same thing would still be happening. Gun control wasn't even being worried about until those shootings.
 
I'm not taking the bait, I'm smarter then the people receiving there obummer phones. But I think we could all agree common sense is not common.
You are so right. Common sense is not common. When I here people talk about something that is not even true such as "Obummer phones" I know common sense is not common. The no cost/lost cost telephones that you want to attribute to President Obama are paid for by funds set aside by the telephone companies. Nice try though.
 
There is a national program that provides low-income people with free or discounted phones, but it was started under George W. Bush, Obama's Republican predecessor. Do I personally care who really started the program? No. Do I listen to anyone who pops off without doing a minimal amount of research? No.

There will be a national discussion on gun control in this country very soon. If you haven't done your research, if you haven't taken the time to provide thoughtful answers to the ensuing questions, please, just don't comment. You'll do more harm than good.
Be careful RSM. You will be labeled as one of those stupid folk from a blue state for stating truth and facts.
 
The most convincing lies are those which are half truths. Anyone with an agenda, political or not, needs to know the facts about what they are speaking on. Not only to defend their opinion adequately from the subsequent attack but also to present their idea/product/opinion in the best light possible, it's nothing more then a carefully concealed sales pitch, and because a large number of individual's are not willing to do their own research in order to form their own opinion they usually pick the side that sounds best to them.

I too must admit I'm curious what you would have said :)
Liberals are held to a different standard by the main stream media. They are rarely questioned on their position. Facts that don't fit their agenda don't matter.
 
Don't you just love it when people tell you what you should or shouldn't do with your constitutional right of free speech?
Even an idiot has the right to free speech.

There's a reason they're called libtards.

Everyone has the right to an opinion, some are simply more valid than others.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,661
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining
Back
Top