Feminist Aborts Male Child Rather Than Bring Another Monster in the World

[Oldgrunt]

I ran across this article concerning a mother who aborted her male child because she said she didn't want to bring another monster into the world. Read the article and other references to see how far we have fallen as a society.

"A feminist blogger has created a massive uproar by detailing her decision to kill her male child in an article entitled “I Aborted My Baby – Because it was a Boy“. She initially believed that she was going to have a girl, and she was making all sorts of plans for her future. But when an ultrasound showed that it was going to be a boy, she decided that she must have an abortion because she “couldn’t bring another monster into the world”. And she says that she would do it again “if the curse returns”. So what would cause a woman to want to kill her own child just because it is a boy? How twisted has feminism in America become if this is the result?"


Feminist Aborts Male Child Because She ?Couldn?t Bring Another Monster Into The World? | Economy

 

[r1derbike]

Don't know all the facts in the case, and she's off-her-bob.

Gotta wonder what the real story is...

...I've seen plenty of female monsters.

There, equal reciprocity.

 

[Bluestar99]

Ironic, she needed a "Monster" to make the one she aborted. Just another Wacko, I would not consider this a trend.

 

[Gregmm6]

Doesn't seem to be true...

snopes.com: I Aborted My Baby — Because It Was a Boy

 

[Gregmm6]

Doesn't seem to be true...

snopes.com: I Aborted My Baby — Because It Was a Boy

 

[Oldgrunt]

Doesn't seem to be true...

snopes.com: I Aborted My Baby — Because It Was a Boy

Sorry, I don't use Snopes to validate anything.

 

[Gregmm6]

Sorry, I don't use Snopes to validate anything.

Haha. I'm more inclined to believe them than the random blog that this story was first reported on. But, hey, to each his own!

Anyway, I don't not believe the story simply because Snopes says it's probably fake.

 

[CharlesMorrison]

Sorry, I don't use Snopes to validate anything.

Darn right bro!
I also don't use wiki crap either.

How can you quote a source that is open for people to augment or defame?

Snopes and Wiki (anything!)....

The pinnacle of modern stupidity...
If its on the "net", well hell.. It MUST be true!

 

[r1derbike]

Believe nothing you read, and only half of what you say. Works for me!

 

[Gregmm6]

Darn right bro!
I also don't use wiki crap either.

How can you quote a source that is open for people to augment or defame?

Snopes and Wiki (anything!)....

The pinnacle of modern stupidity...
If its on the "net", well hell.. It MUST be true!

"The pinnacle of modern stupidity...
If its on the "net", well hell.. It MUST be true"

Exactly. It's quite stupid to believe that this story is true at all.

 

[vernsimpson]

"The pinnacle of modern stupidity...
If its on the "net", well hell.. It MUST be true"

Exactly. It's quite stupid to believe that this story is true at all.

Actually it's quite stupid not to believe this story. There are way to many low info fame seeking morons out there that will do ANYTHING to get noticed and get their 15 minutes of fame!

Look at some of the no talent people that she most likely follows. Such the Kardashians, Paris Hilton and many others. The ONLY talent they have is how to keep their names in the headlines!

 

[Gregmm6]

Actually it's quite stupid not to believe this story. There are way to many low info fame seeking morons out there that will do ANYTHING to get noticed and get their 15 minutes of fame!

Look at some of the no talent people that she most likely follows. Such the Kardashians, Paris Hilton and many others. The ONLY talent they have is how to keep their names in the headlines!

Haha, no. It's quite stupid to believe a story posted on some random blog without any type of evidence or sources to back it up. Sorry.

 

[vernsimpson]

Haha, no. It's quite stupid to believe a story posted on some random blog without any type of evidence or sources to back it up. Sorry.

Typical troll answer!

 

[Gregmm6]

Typical troll answer!

Really? Thinking that facts, sources, and evidence are important when trying to determine whether or not something is true is now trolling?

 

[vernsimpson]

Really? Thinking that facts, sources, and evidence are important when trying to determine whether or not something is true is now trolling?

Then prove that the story is false!

 

[Gregmm6]

Then prove that the story is false!

That's not the way that the real world works. It's not the job of the person hearing a claim to prove that a claim is false. The burden of proof lies with the person making the claim. It's their responsibility to prove it's true.

 

[CharlesMorrison]

Exactly. It's quite stupid to believe that this story is true at all.

I was talking about your "sincerity".....
Link Removed

 

[BigSlick]

Doesn't seem to be true...

snopes.com: I Aborted My Baby — Because It Was a Boy

Snopes.com is not the beacon of truth. I'm surprised you didn't ask Obama.

 

[Arc Angel]

Gee, last time I blew the dust off the cover of my Bible, and actually looked inside, it said something about, 'Thou shalt not murder.' or some such. I ask you: What the world is coming to when a mother can't kill her own child? I mean it's Mom's body, and all that - Right!

Nobody should tell a woman what to do with her own body - Not even God; and, then, there's that famous quote from some mysterious Jewish Prophet - a man called Jesus Christ, or something - 'By the standard that ye judge you also shall be judged; and by the measure that ye mete out, you also shall be measured.'

Finally, there's that nagging, often repeated, biblical admonition, 'The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom!' I don't know about you; but, in my own experience, I haven't met too many genuinely, 'wise' people. Smart? Yes. Wise? No.