*Federal Judge says gun owners need not provide a 'good reason'.*

Bout time... It's written really clearly so adding all kinds of other language to it, or interpreting it to mean something else is liberal nonsense... Seems peoples attitudes are beginning to change about the basic right to self defense...

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Asking for permission to exercise a "GOD GIVEN RIGHT" is not exercising a "RIGHT"... If you have to ask permission it's a privilege..

Hang on, any minute now NoGuns will be here to refute all this and tell us how the judge got it all wrong...
 
Oh good heavens - A Fed Judge said that the second amendment is reason enough? Does that mean the Fed Judge actually thinks the Founding Fathers really meant that "The People" keeping and bearing arms, including OUTSIDE their homes, was necessary to the security of a free state? And that an attempt to infringe the bearing of arms (outside the home) is (GASP) unconstitutional? In this lifetime?
 
Maybe this is a start for MD lawmakers to get their heads out of their Azz. Coincidently, I just mailed off my permit application to MSP this morning. I guess I really did not need to go through the last month getting all the documents to back up my "good reason".
 
I sure hope this judge makes it to the Supreme Court sometime soon. Of course we have to find Obama a new home first!
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,523
Messages
610,661
Members
74,992
Latest member
RedDotArmsTraining
Back
Top